
API Design Patterns
FreeStreamline your REST API design with best practices.
Free · Opens the source repo
What API Design Patterns does
The API Design Patterns skill provides a comprehensive guide to designing REST APIs that are consistent and user-friendly. It covers essential topics such as resource naming conventions, HTTP methods, status codes, pagination, filtering, error responses, versioning, and rate limiting. By adhering to these best practices, developers can create APIs that are intuitive for users and maintainable in the long run.
This skill is particularly useful for developers and designers who are involved in the creation or review of API endpoints. It offers clear guidelines on how to structure URLs, choose appropriate HTTP methods, and handle responses effectively. For instance, it emphasizes the importance of using plural nouns for resource names and provides examples of both good and bad practices. Additionally, it outlines how to implement pagination and filtering, which are critical for enhancing the usability of APIs that handle large datasets.
The skill also addresses common pitfalls in API design, such as improper use of HTTP status codes and error handling. By following the recommended patterns, developers can avoid confusion and ensure that their APIs communicate errors clearly to clients. Furthermore, the skill discusses versioning strategies, helping teams manage changes to their APIs without disrupting existing clients.
Whether you are designing new APIs or refining existing ones, this skill serves as a valuable reference to ensure your APIs are robust, efficient, and user-friendly. It is suitable for both novice and experienced developers looking to improve their API design skills.
When to use it
Use this skill when designing new API endpoints or reviewing existing API contracts to ensure best practices are followed.
When not to use it
This skill may not be suitable for non-RESTful APIs or when working with protocols other than HTTP.
What you can build with it
Designing a New API
Utilize this skill to establish a solid foundation for your new REST API by following recommended design patterns.
Reviewing Existing API Contracts
Employ the guidelines to assess and improve the design of current APIs, ensuring they adhere to best practices.
Implementing Pagination and Filtering
Refer to this skill when adding pagination and filtering capabilities to enhance the usability of your APIs.
How to install API Design Patterns
View source1. Install with the skills CLI
npx skills add affaan-m/ecc/api-design --agent claude-code2. Or install it manually
Download the skill folder and drop it into ~/.claude/skills/ for all projects, or .claude/skills/ to scope it to one repo. Restart Claude Code so it picks up the new skill.
Anthropic's agentic coding CLI, and the reference implementation of Agent Skills. Drop a skill folder into ~/.claude/skills and Claude Code loads it automatically whenever a task matches the skill's description. Claude Code docs
Inside SKILL.md
Written by affaan-mAPI Design Patterns
Conventions and best practices for designing consistent, developer-friendly REST APIs.
When to Activate
- Designing new API endpoints
- Reviewing existing API contracts
- Adding pagination, filtering, or sorting
- Implementing error handling for APIs
- Planning API versioning strategy
- Building public or partner-facing APIs
Resource Design
URL Structure
# Resources are nouns, plural, lowercase, kebab-case
GET /api/v1/users
GET /api/v1/users/:id
POST /api/v1/users
PUT /api/v1/users/:id
PATCH /api/v1/users/:id
DELETE /api/v1/users/:id
# Sub-resources for relationships
GET /api/v1/users/:id/orders
POST /api/v1/users/:id/orders
# Actions that don't map to CRUD (use verbs sparingly)
POST /api/v1/orders/:id/cancel
POST /api/v1/auth/login
POST /api/v1/auth/refresh
Naming Rules
# GOOD
/api/v1/team-members # kebab-case for multi-word resources
/api/v1/orders?status=active # query params for filtering
/api/v1/users/123/orders # nested resources for ownership
# BAD
/api/v1/getUsers # verb in URL
/api/v1/user # singular (use plural)
/api/v1/team_members # snake_case in URLs
/api/v1/users/123/getOrders # verb in nested resource
HTTP Methods and Status Codes
Method Semantics
| Method | Idempotent | Safe | Use For |
|---|---|---|---|
| GET | Yes | Yes | Retrieve resources |
| POST | No | No | Create resources, trigger actions |
| PUT | Yes | No | Full replacement of a resource |
| PATCH | No* | No | Partial update of a resource |
| DELETE | Yes | No | Remove a resource |
*PATCH can be made idempotent with proper implementation
Status Code Reference
# Success
200 OK — GET, PUT, PATCH (with response body)
201 Created — POST (include Location header)
204 No Content — DELETE, PUT (no response body)
# Client Errors
400 Bad Request — Validation failure, malformed JSON
401 Unauthorized — Missing or invalid authentication
403 Forbidden — Authenticated but not authorized
404 Not Found — Resource doesn't exist
409 Conflict — Duplicate entry, state conflict
422 Unprocessable Entity — Semantically invalid (valid JSON, bad data)
429 Too Many Requests — Rate limit exceeded
# Server Errors
500 Internal Server Error — Unexpected failure (never expose details)
502 Bad Gateway — Upstream service failed
503 Service Unavailable — Temporary overload, include Retry-After
Common Mistakes
# BAD: 200 for everything
{ "status": 200, "success": false, "error": "Not found" }
# GOOD: Use HTTP status codes semantically
HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found
{ "error": { "code": "not_found", "message": "User not found" } }
# BAD: 500 for validation errors
# GOOD: 400 or 422 with field-level details
# BAD: 200 for created resources
# GOOD: 201 with Location header
HTTP/1.1 201 Created
Location: /api/v1/users/abc-123
Response Format
Success Response
{
"data": {
"id": "abc-123",
"email": "alice@example.com",
"name": "Alice",
"created_at": "2025-01-15T10:30:00Z"
}
}
Collection Response (with Pagination)
{
"data": [
{ "id": "abc-123", "name": "Alice" },
{ "id": "def-456", "name": "Bob" }
],
"meta": {
"total": 142,
"page": 1,
"per_page": 20,
"total_pages": 8
},
"links": {
"self": "/api/v1/users?page=1&per_page=20",
"next": "/api/v1/users?page=2&per_page=20",
"last": "/api/v1/users?page=8&per_page=20"
}
}
Error Response
{
"error": {
"code": "validation_error",
"message": "Request validation failed",
"details": [
{
"field": "email",
"message": "Must be a valid email address",
"code": "invalid_format"
},
{
"field": "age",
"message": "Must be between 0 and 150",
"code": "out_of_range"
}
]
}
}
Response Envelope Variants
// Option A: Envelope with data wrapper (recommended for public APIs)
interface ApiResponse<T> {
data: T;
meta?: PaginationMeta;
links?: PaginationLinks;
}
interface ApiError {
error: {
code: string;
message: string;
details?: FieldError[];
};
}
// Option B: Flat response (simpler, common for internal APIs)
// Success: just return the resource directly
// Error: return error object
// Distinguish by HTTP status code
Pagination
Offset-Based (Simple)
GET /api/v1/users?page=2&per_page=20
# Implementation
SELECT * FROM users
ORDER BY created_at DESC
LIMIT 20 OFFSET 20;
Pros: Easy to implement, supports "jump to page N" Cons: Slow on large offsets (OFFSET 100000), inconsistent with concurrent inserts
Cursor-Based (Scalable)
GET /api/v1/users?cursor=eyJpZCI6MTIzfQ&limit=20
# Implementation
SELECT * FROM users
WHERE id > :cursor_id
ORDER BY id ASC
LIMIT 21; -- fetch one extra to determine has_next
{
"data": [...],
"meta": {
"has_next": true,
"next_cursor": "eyJpZCI6MTQzfQ"
}
}
Pros: Consistent performance regardless of position, stable with concurrent inserts Cons: Cannot jump to arbitrary page, cursor is opaque
When to Use Which
| Use Case | Pagination Type |
|---|---|
| Admin dashboards, small datasets (<10K) | Offset |
| Infinite scroll, feeds, large datasets | Cursor |
| Public APIs | Cursor (default) with offset (optional) |
| Search results | Offset (users expect page numbers) |
Filtering, Sorting, and Search
Filtering
# Simple equality
GET /api/v1/orders?status=active&customer_id=abc-123
# Comparison operators (use bracket notation)
GET /api/v1/products?price[gte]=10&price[lte]=100
GET /api/v1/orders?created_at[after]=2025-01-01
# Multiple values (comma-separated)
GET /api/v1/products?category=electronics,clothing
# Nested fields (dot notation)
GET /api/v1/orders?customer.country=US
Sorting
# Single field (prefix - for descending)
GET /api/v1/products?sort=-created_at
# Multiple fields (comma-separated)
GET /api/v1/products?sort=-featured,price,-created_at
Full-Text Search
# Search query parameter
GET /api/v1/products?q=wireless+headphones
# Field-specific search
GET /api/v1/users?email=alice
Sparse Fieldsets
# Return only specified fields (reduces payload)
GET /api/v1/users?fields=id,name,email
GET /api/v1/orders?fields=id,total,status&include=customer.name
Authentication and Authorization
Token-Based Auth
# Bearer token in Authorization header
GET /api/v1/users
Authorization: Bearer eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIs...
# API key (for server-to-server)
GET /api/v1/data
X-API-Key: sk_live_abc123
Authorization Patterns
// Resource-level: check ownership
app.get("/api/v1/orders/:id", async (req, res) => {
const order = await Order.findById(req.params.id);
if (!order) return res.status(404).json({ error: { code: "not_found" } });
if (order.userId !== req.user.id) return res.status(403).json({ error: { code: "forbidden" } });
return res.json({ data: order });
});
// Role-based: check permissions
app.delete("/api/v1/users/:id", requireRole("admin"), async (req, res) => {
await User.delete(req.params.id);
return res.status(204).send();
});
Rate Limiting
Headers
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
X-RateLimit-Limit: 100
X-RateLimit-Remaining: 95
X-RateLimit-Reset: 1640000000
# When exceeded
HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Retry-After: 60
{
"error": {
"code": "rate_limit_exceeded",
"message": "Rate limit exceeded. Try again in 60 seconds."
}
}
Rate Limit Tiers
| Tier | Limit | Window | Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anonymous | 30/min | Per IP | Public endpoints |
| Authenticated | 100/min | Per user | Standard API access |
| Premium | 1000/min | Per API key | Paid API plans |
| Internal | 10000/min | Per service | Service-to-service |
Versioning
URL Path Versioning (Recommended)
/api/v1/users
/api/v2/users
Pros: Explicit, easy to route, cacheable Cons: URL changes between versions
Header Versioning
GET /api/users
Accept: application/vnd.myapp.v2+json
Pros: Clean URLs Cons: Harder to test, easy to forget
Versioning Strategy
1. Start with /api/v1/ — don't version until you need to
2. Maintain at most 2 active versions (current + previous)
3. Deprecation timeline:
- Announce deprecation (6 months notice for public APIs)
- Add Sunset header: Sunset: Sat, 01 Jan 2026 00:00:00 GMT
- Return 410 Gone after sunset date
4. Non-breaking changes don't need a new version:
- Adding new fields to responses
- Adding new optional query parameters
- Adding new endpoints
5. Breaking changes require a new version:
- Removing or renaming fields
- Changing field types
- Changing URL structure
- Changing authentication method
Implementation Patterns
TypeScript (Next.js API Route)
import { z } from "zod";
import { NextRequest, NextResponse } from "next/server";
const createUserSchema = z.object({
email: z.string().email(),
name: z.string().min(1).max(100),
});
export async function POST(req: NextRequest) {
const body = await req.json();
const parsed = createUserSchema.safeParse(body);
if (!parsed.success) {
return NextResponse.json({
error: {
code: "validation_error",
message: "Request validation failed",
details: parsed.error.issues.map(i => ({
field: i.path.join("."),
message: i.message,
code: i.code,
})),
},
}, { status: 422 });
}
const user = await createUser(parsed.data);
return NextResponse.json(
{ data: user },
{
status: 201,
headers: { Location: `/api/v1/users/${user.id}` },
},
);
}
Python (Django REST Framework)
from rest_framework import serializers, viewsets, status
from rest_framework.response import Response
class CreateUserSerializer(serializers.Serializer):
email = serializers.EmailField()
name = serializers.CharField(max_length=100)
class UserSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
class Meta:
model = User
fields = ["id", "email", "name", "created_at"]
class UserViewSet(viewsets.ModelViewSet):
serializer_class = UserSerializer
permission_classes = [IsAuthenticated]
def get_serializer_class(self):
if self.action == "create":
return CreateUserSerializer
return UserSerializer
def create(self, request):
serializer = CreateUserSerializer(data=request.data)
serializer.is_valid(raise_exception=True)
user = UserService.create(**serializer.validated_data)
return Response(
{"data": UserSerializer(user).data},
status=status.HTTP_201_CREATED,
headers={"Location": f"/api/v1/users/{user.id}"},
)
Go (net/http)
func (h *UserHandler) CreateUser(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
var req CreateUserRequest
if err := json.NewDecoder(r.Body).Decode(&req); err != nil {
writeError(w, http.StatusBadRequest, "invalid_json", "Invalid request body")
return
}
if err := req.Validate(); err != nil {
writeError(w, http.StatusUnprocessableEntity, "validation_error", err.Error())
return
}
user, err := h.service.Create(r.Context(), req)
if err != nil {
switch {
case errors.Is(err, domain.ErrEmailTaken):
writeError(w, http.StatusConflict, "email_taken", "Email already registered")
default:
writeError(w, http.StatusInternalServerError, "internal_error", "Internal error")
}
return
}
w.Header().Set("Location", fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/users/%s", user.ID))
writeJSON(w, http.StatusCreated, map[string]any{"data": user})
}
API Design Checklist
Before shipping a new endpoint:
- Resource URL follows naming conventions (plural, kebab-case, no verbs)
- Correct HTTP method used (GET for reads, POST for creates, etc.)
- Appropriate status codes returned (not 200 for everything)
- Input validated with schema (Zod, Pydantic, Bean Validation)
- Error responses follow standard format with codes and messages
- Pagination implemented for list endpoints (cursor or offset)
- Authentication required (or explicitly marked as public)
- Authorization checked (user can only access their own resources)
- Rate limiting configured
- Response does not leak internal details (stack traces, SQL errors)
- Consistent naming with existing endpoints (camelCase vs snake_case)
- Documented (OpenAPI/Swagger spec updated)
Frequently asked questions about API Design Patterns
Similar skills
WinMD API Search
Easily find and explore Windows desktop APIs.
WebMCPify
Transform any web app into an agent-ready platform.
Phoenix Tracing
Instrument LLM applications with OpenInference tracing.
Foundry Hosted Agent CopilotKit
Guidance for developing agentic web apps on Azure.
Power Automate Foundation
Connect AI agents to Power Automate seamlessly.
Power Automate Flow Builder
Efficiently build and deploy Power Automate flows programmatically.
