New to Claude Skills? Learn how to install them →

Aposthog on GitHub

Auditing Endpoints

Free

Streamline your PostHog endpoints with detailed audits.

by posthog37.6k stars on posthog/posthog
1 views
Updated Aug 11, 2026
Get this skill

Free · Opens the source repo

What Auditing Endpoints does

The Auditing Endpoints skill provides a comprehensive analysis of the endpoints within a PostHog project. It identifies issues such as unused endpoints, failing materialisations, and stale materialised versions, allowing users to manage their endpoints more effectively. This skill is particularly useful for developers and project managers looking to maintain a clean and efficient API environment. It does not modify any endpoints automatically; instead, it generates a prioritized report that highlights potential issues and suggests actions based on the findings.

When using this skill, users can expect to receive detailed insights into the status of their endpoints. The audit process begins with querying the metadata and usage statistics of each endpoint, which helps in identifying candidates for cleanup. The skill leverages SQL queries to access the necessary data from system tables, ensuring that users have a clear view of endpoint activity and performance. The results are categorized by issue type, making it easier for users to focus on the most pressing concerns.

This skill is ideal for scenarios such as onboarding to a new project, conducting regular maintenance reviews, or managing costs associated with materialisations. By providing a structured approach to endpoint management, it empowers users to make informed decisions about which endpoints to disable or unmaterialise, ultimately leading to a more streamlined API.

For users who need to dive deeper into specific endpoint performance issues, the skill can hand off to the diagnosing-endpoint-performance tool. This collaborative approach ensures that users have access to a full suite of resources for maintaining their PostHog environment effectively.

When to use it

Use this skill when you need to audit endpoints for potential cleanup or when taking over an existing project to assess its state.

When not to use it

This skill is not suitable for real-time monitoring or automatic endpoint modifications; it focuses solely on reporting and analysis.

What you can build with it

Onboarding to a New Project

When taking over a new PostHog project, use this skill to quickly assess the health of its endpoints.

Periodic Endpoint Review

Conduct regular audits to ensure that your API remains efficient and free of unused or failing endpoints.

Cost Management

If you're exceeding materialisation costs, this skill helps identify which endpoints can be disabled or unmaterialised.

How to install Auditing Endpoints

View source

1. Install with the skills CLI

npx skills add posthog/posthog/auditing-endpoints --agent claude-code

2. Or install it manually

Download the skill folder and drop it into ~/.claude/skills/ for all projects, or .claude/skills/ to scope it to one repo. Restart Claude Code so it picks up the new skill.

Anthropic's agentic coding CLI, and the reference implementation of Agent Skills. Drop a skill folder into ~/.claude/skills and Claude Code loads it automatically whenever a task matches the skill's description. Claude Code docs

Inside SKILL.md

Written by posthog

Auditing endpoints

This skill produces a project-wide audit of the Endpoints product. Use it when the user wants to find what to clean up — unused endpoints, failing materialisations, materialised versions that nobody calls any more. It does not modify anything; it reports.

The deeper investigation per endpoint is diagnosing-endpoint-performance. The audit's job is to find candidates and hand off.

When to use this skill

  • "Audit my endpoints" / "What endpoints can I clean up?"
  • The user is taking over a project and wants to know what they've inherited
  • A periodic review (monthly / quarterly) of endpoint sprawl
  • The user is over a materialisation cost budget and wants to know what to disable

The dedicated tools give a fast endpoint-level view. For call frequency, recency, and cost over time, query the query_log table with execute-sql (endpoint-level). Per-version recency comes from endpoint-versions — each version carries its own last_executed_at.

Available tools

ToolWhat it's for
execute-sql (HogQL)Primary read path. Query system.data_modeling_endpoints for metadata (name, is_active, current_version, derived_from_insight, last_executed_at) and query_log for endpoint-level usage (call counts, recency, duration, bytes)
endpoint-materialization-statusPer endpoint: is materialisation eligible, current status, last run, last error (not in the system tables — use this tool)
endpoint-versionsAll versions for one endpoint, latest first, with each version's query, materialisation state, and last_executed_at
endpoint-updateWrite path — disable (is_active: false) or unmaterialise (is_materialized: false) after the user confirms
agent-feedbackTell the PostHog team what's missing or confusing in this flow so the product and skill improve

Prefer reading from the system tables over the endpoints-get-all / endpoint-get tools — one SQL query returns the whole inventory and lets you join metadata to usage in query_log.

What counts as an issue

CategoryTriggerTypical action
Never calledNo rows in query_log for the endpoint (personal-API-key calls only)Confirm with the user, then disable
Stalequery_log shows the last call more than 30 days agoConfirm with the user; often safe to disable
Inactiveis_active = 0 in system.data_modeling_endpointsVerify intent; if abandoned, delete
Failing materialisationendpoint-materialization-status returns Failed with an errorHand off to diagnosing-endpoint-performance
Unused materialised versionA materialised version whose last_executed_at (from endpoint-versions) is null or long staleUnmaterialise that version, or roll to a newer one
Drifted versionsMany versions exist (query changed repeatedly)History noise — not an issue, but worth noting

Usage counts only personal-API-key calls — an endpoint exercised solely from the Playground tab or the app will look unused. Per-version last_executed_at is recorded only for runs since that tracking was added, so a version can read null while still being used; always confirm before removing.

Workflow

1. List endpoints and their metadata

One execute-sql query gets the whole inventory from system.data_modeling_endpoints:

SELECT name, is_active, current_version, derived_from_insight, last_executed_at
FROM system.data_modeling_endpoints
ORDER BY name

No rows → the project has no endpoints; say so and stop. Don't invent issues. (The last_executed_at column here is a convenience endpoint-level timestamp; for call frequency and cost, use query_log in the next step.)

2. Pull usage from query_log

query_log records every personal-API-key call, tagged with the endpoint name. One query gives recency and call counts across all endpoints:

SELECT name, count() AS calls, max(query_start_time) AS last_called
FROM query_log
WHERE endpoint LIKE '%/endpoints/%' AND is_personal_api_key_request
GROUP BY name
ORDER BY name

Cross-reference with step 1:

  • In metadata, absent from query_log → never called via API key
  • Last call more than 30 days ago → stale

query_log also exposes query_duration_ms, read_rows, and read_bytes per call — useful to flag expensive endpoints in the same pass. This is endpoint-level; per-version recency comes from endpoint-versions (step 3).

3. Check materialisation health and unused versions

For each materialised endpoint, call endpoint-materialization-status (this isn't in the system tables). Surface any with status: "Failed" separately — these are active failures, not staleness.

Then call endpoint-versions and read each version's last_executed_at: a materialised version that's null or long stale is an unused-materialised-version candidate. Treat this as a lead, not proof — per-version recency only counts API-key runs since tracking was added, so confirm with the user before unmaterialising.

4. Present the audit

Render a prioritised report grouped by category. Don't dump raw JSON; use a readable table per section:

## Endpoints audit — 9 issues

### 🔴 Failing materialisations (1)
- weekly_revenue (v3) — Failed 2h ago, "Column 'event_date' does not exist"
  → hand off to diagnosing-endpoint-performance

### 🟠 Never called via API key (3)
- internal_admin_query — created 5 months ago
- legacy_signup_funnel — created 1 year ago, materialised
- experiment_arm_lookup — created 9 months ago

### 🟠 Unused materialised versions (2)  [from endpoint-versions]
- monthly_active_users — v3 materialised, last_executed_at null (currently on v4 — unmaterialise v3)
- order_summary — v1 materialised, last_executed_at null

### 🟡 Stale (3)
- holiday_promo_2024 — last called 4 months ago
- ab_test_phase_1 — last called 2 months ago
- daily_revenue_cohort — last called 45 days ago

Recommended order:
1. Investigate the failing materialisation (blocks fresh data)
2. Unmaterialise the unused versions (free storage + compute)
3. Disable the never-called endpoints (if user confirms)
4. Review stale endpoints with the user

The exact format is less important than: prioritised, grouped, actionable, and hand-off clear.

5. Offer the next step

End with a clear question, not a decision:

  • "Want me to unmaterialise the unused versions?" — needs endpoint-update with is_materialized: false per version
  • "Want me to disable the never-called endpoints?" — needs endpoint-update with is_active: false
  • "Want me to dig into the failing materialisation?" — hands off to diagnosing-endpoint-performance

Never act from the audit alone. Disabling or unmaterialising affects external API consumers; always confirm before modifying.

Example interaction

User: "Audit my endpoints"

Agent steps:
- execute-sql on system.data_modeling_endpoints → 12 endpoints (4 materialised)
- execute-sql on query_log grouped by name → 8 endpoints have calls
- endpoint-materialization-status on each materialised endpoint → 1 failing
- endpoint-versions on the materialised ones → order_summary v2's last_executed_at is null

- Report:
  "Found 6 things worth looking at across 12 endpoints:

   🔴 Failing materialisations (1)
   - monthly_active_users (v2) — materialisation failed yesterday with
     'memory limit exceeded'. The endpoint is still callable inline but
     responses will be slower.

   🟠 Never called via API key (3)
   - legacy_funnel_v1 — created 11 months ago
   - test_export — created 3 months ago
   - admin_dump — created 8 months ago, materialised (wasteful)

   🟠 Unused materialised versions (1)  [from endpoint-versions]
   - order_summary v2 — materialised but its last_executed_at is null
     while v3 is current. Likely safe to unmaterialise v2.

   🟡 Stale (1)
   - holiday_2024 — last called 5 months ago

   Caveat: usage only counts personal-API-key calls; playground and
   dashboard runs aren't counted. Per-version recency comes from
   endpoint-versions and is sparse. Confirm before disabling.

   Want me to start with the failing materialisation, or clean up the
   unused version first?"

Important notes

  • The audit is read-only. Never call destructive tools from this flow. Hand off or confirm before any modification.
  • Empty = healthy. Don't pad an empty report with theoretical issues. "Nothing to clean up" is a good answer.
  • Read with SQL, drill in with the version tool. system.data_modeling_endpoints (metadata) and query_log (endpoint-level call counts, recency, cost) via execute-sql answer most of the audit. Per-version recency comes from endpoint-versions (each version's last_executed_at).
  • API-key-only scope. Usage only counts personal-API-key calls. An endpoint exercised only from the Playground tab or the app will look unused. Always confirm before acting.
  • Materialisation costs storage and compute. When an endpoint no longer needs materialisation, the cheapest fix is endpoint-update with is_materialized: false — not deleting the endpoint.
  • Inactive ≠ stale. An endpoint with is_active: false was deliberately turned off. Don't recommend deletion unless the user confirms it's truly abandoned.

Frequently asked questions about Auditing Endpoints

Similar skills