New to Claude Skills? Learn how to install them →

Adanielmiessler on GitHub

Autonomous Optimization

Free

Streamline your performance tuning with automated feedback loops.

Get this skill

Free · Opens the source repo

What Autonomous Optimization does

The Autonomous Optimization skill provides a systematic approach to enhance code and prompts through an automated optimization loop. By running experiments that modify a target, measure the results, and retain only the successful changes, this skill eliminates the tedious manual process of performance tuning. It offers two operational modes: metric mode for code targets that yield quantifiable metrics, and eval mode for skills and prompts assessed by an LLM-based evaluation system. This dual functionality allows developers and designers to optimize both numerical performance indicators and qualitative aspects of their work.

In metric mode, users can specify a target metric, such as page load time or bundle size, and define a shell command to measure it. The skill will then execute a series of modifications to the codebase, keeping track of improvements based on the defined metric. This is particularly useful for developers looking to enhance the performance of their applications systematically. The eval mode, on the other hand, is tailored for optimizing prompts and skills. It leverages LLM-as-judge evaluations to provide binary assessments of changes, allowing for a more nuanced understanding of the effectiveness of modifications.

The skill addresses the common problem of manual tuning, which is often slow and prone to human error. By automating the process, it enables users to explore a wider range of modifications without the fatigue associated with manual testing. The autonomous loop runs efficiently, with metric mode capable of executing around 12 experiments per hour, while eval mode can handle 6-8 experiments per hour, depending on the complexity of the evaluations. This efficiency helps users reach optimal performance levels that might otherwise remain undiscovered due to the labor-intensive nature of manual tuning.

Developers and designers who frequently engage in performance optimization will find this skill particularly valuable. Whether it's improving code efficiency or enhancing the effectiveness of AI prompts, the Autonomous Optimization skill provides a structured and automated way to achieve measurable improvements, making it a worthy addition to any optimization toolkit.

When to use it

Use this skill when you need to optimize code performance metrics or evaluate the effectiveness of prompts and skills systematically.

When not to use it

This skill may not be suitable for one-off changes or situations where qualitative assessments cannot be quantified, as it relies on measurable outcomes.

What you can build with it

Optimize Web Application Performance

Use metric mode to enhance your web app's performance metrics, such as load times or responsiveness.

Improve AI Prompt Effectiveness

Utilize eval mode to refine prompts or skills, ensuring they yield better responses from AI models.

Streamline Code Refactoring

Automate the process of refactoring code by continuously measuring and optimizing based on defined metrics.

How to install Autonomous Optimization

View source

1. Install with the skills CLI

npx skills add danielmiessler/lifeos/Optimize --agent claude-code

2. Or install it manually

Download the skill folder and drop it into ~/.claude/skills/ for all projects, or .claude/skills/ to scope it to one repo. Restart Claude Code so it picks up the new skill.

Anthropic's agentic coding CLI, and the reference implementation of Agent Skills. Drop a skill folder into ~/.claude/skills and Claude Code loads it automatically whenever a task matches the skill's description. Claude Code docs

Inside SKILL.md

Written by danielmiessler

/optimize — Autonomous Optimization v2

What It Does

Runs an autonomous optimization loop against any target. The agent modifies the target, measures the result, keeps improvements, discards failures, and repeats until it stops climbing. Two modes: metric mode for code targets that produce a number (latency, bundle size), and eval mode for skills, prompts, or agents judged by LLM-as-judge binary evals.

The Problem

Tuning a thing for a measurable outcome is slow, boring, manual work. You change a file, run the measurement, eyeball whether it got better, keep or revert, then do it again — dozens of times. People give up after a few rounds and settle for "good enough" far short of the real ceiling. The targets without a clean number (a skill's quality, a prompt's effectiveness) are worse: there's no easy way to tell if a change actually helped. This skill runs that whole loop for you and only keeps changes that measurably win.

How It Works

Two modes drive the same hill-climb loop:

  • Metric mode — code targets with a shell command that produces a number (the original).
  • Eval mode — skills, prompts, agents, or any text target judged by LLM-as-judge binary evals.

Inspired by Karpathy's autoresearch and extended with LLM-as-judge evaluation.

Invocation

Metric Mode (code targets)

/optimize --metric "lighthouse_score" --higher-is-better \
  --measure "npx lighthouse http://localhost:3000 --output=json" \
  --extract "jq '.categories.performance.score * 100' lighthouse.json" \
  --files "src/**/*.tsx,src/**/*.css" \
  --budget 120

/optimize --resume        # Resume a previous optimization loop
/optimize --status        # Show results summary from last/current run

Eval Mode (skill/prompt/agent targets)

/optimize --target "~/.claude/skills/ExtractWisdom"
/optimize --target "~/.claude/skills/Research/Workflows/QuickResearch.md"
/optimize --target "prompts/my-prompt.md"
/optimize --target "~/.claude/skills/ExtractWisdom" --max-experiments 20

In eval mode, the system automatically:

  1. Detects the target type (skill, prompt, agent, code, function)
  2. Reads the target to understand its purpose and constraints
  3. Generates 3-6 binary eval criteria and 3-5 test inputs
  4. Presents criteria + inputs for your approval before starting
  5. Runs the optimization loop using LLM-as-judge scoring
  6. Presents a recommendation (apply/reject/partial) when done

What Happens

This skill drives the LifeOS Algorithm as an autonomous mutation loop:

  1. OBSERVE — Define or auto-detect the target, set eval_mode
  2. THINK — Analyze codebase/skill, generate hypothesis queue
  3. PLAN — Prioritize hypotheses by expected impact
  4. BUILD — Phase 0: TARGET ANALYSIS (see optimize-loop.md)
    • Detect target type, auto-generate eval criteria (eval mode), set up sandbox, baseline
  5. EXECUTE — The autonomous loop (optimize-loop.md):
    • Hypothesize → Modify target → Measure (metric or eval) → Keep/Revert → Repeat
    • Metric mode: ~12 experiments/hour (at 5-min budget)
    • Eval mode: ~6-8 experiments/hour (multi-run judging is slower)
  6. VERIFY — Phase 9: RECOMMEND — diff, summary, apply/reject/partial options
  7. LEARN — Phase 10: EXTRACT LEARNINGS — what worked, what didn't, structured insights

Arguments — Metric Mode

ArgumentRequiredDefaultDescription
--metric NAMEyesHuman-readable metric name
--measure COMMANDyesShell command that produces the metric
--files GLOByesFiles the agent may modify (comma-separated)
--higher-is-better(default)Higher metric values are better
--lower-is-betterLower metric values are better
--extract COMMANDLast number in stdoutExtract metric from output
--budget SECONDS300Time budget per experiment
--target VALUEnoneStop when metric reaches this value
--max-experiments NnoneStop after N experiments
--locked GLOBnoneFiles the agent must NOT modify
--constraints TEXTnoneAdditional rules (e.g., "tests must pass")

Arguments — Eval Mode

ArgumentRequiredDefaultDescription
--target PATHyesPath to skill directory, prompt file, or agent definition
--max-experiments NnoneStop after N experiments
--runs N3Runs per experiment (more = more reliable, slower)
--criteria "Q1" "Q2"auto-generatedOverride auto-generated eval criteria
--inputs "I1" "I2"auto-generatedOverride auto-generated test inputs
--budget SECONDS300Time budget per experiment

Shared Arguments

ArgumentDescription
--resumeResume a previous optimization run
--statusShow results summary

Algorithm Integration

When /optimize is invoked, the eval_mode is set based on arguments (mode: is retired — never write it to frontmatter):

  • --measure provided → eval_mode: metric (git branch sandbox)
  • --target provided → eval_mode: eval (directory sandbox)

ISC criteria become guard rails — assertions that must hold true across ALL experiments. Guard rails must REMAIN satisfied perpetually. A violation triggers automatic revert regardless of score improvement.

Reference files:

  • ~/.claude/LIFEOS/ALGORITHM/optimize-loop.md — the full loop protocol
  • ~/.claude/LIFEOS/ALGORITHM/eval-guide.md — how to write good eval criteria
  • ~/.claude/LIFEOS/ALGORITHM/archive/target-types.md — target detection and ISC generation

Examples

Metric Mode

Optimize page load time:

/optimize --metric "lighthouse_perf" --higher-is-better \
  --measure "npx lighthouse http://localhost:3000 --output=json --output-path=lh.json" \
  --extract "jq '.categories.performance.score * 100' lh.json" \
  --files "src/**/*.tsx,src/**/*.css" \
  --target 95 --budget 120

Optimize bundle size:

/optimize --metric "bundle_bytes" --lower-is-better \
  --measure "bun run build 2>&1 && du -sb dist/ | cut -f1" \
  --files "src/**/*.ts" \
  --constraints "all tests must pass"

ML training (Karpathy-style):

/optimize --metric "val_bpb" --lower-is-better \
  --measure "uv run train.py > run.log 2>&1 && grep '^val_bpb:' run.log | cut -d' ' -f2" \
  --files "train.py" \
  --locked "prepare.py" \
  --budget 300

Eval Mode

Optimize a skill's Extract workflow:

/optimize --target "~/.claude/skills/ExtractWisdom" --max-experiments 15

Optimize a standalone prompt:

/optimize --target "prompts/summarize-article.md" --runs 5

Optimize with custom criteria:

/optimize --target "~/.claude/skills/Research/Workflows/QuickResearch.md" \
  --criteria "Does the output contain specific facts with sources?" \
            "Is the output structured with clear sections?" \
            "Does the output avoid generic filler?" \
  --inputs "research quantum computing breakthroughs 2025" \
           "quick research on supply chain security" \
           "find recent developments in AI agents"

Gotchas

  • Hill-climbing can get stuck in local optima. If score plateaus, consider resetting with different initial conditions.
  • Eval mode vs metric mode: Use metric mode for quantifiable targets (latency, size). Use eval mode for qualitative targets (skill quality, prompt effectiveness).
  • Regression tolerance prevents catastrophic changes. Don't set it to 0 — some regression in secondary metrics is acceptable if primary metric improves significantly.

Frequently asked questions about Autonomous Optimization

Similar skills