
Building Incident Response Playbooks
FreeCreate structured incident response procedures efficiently.
Free · Opens the source repo
What Building Incident Response Playbooks does
The Building Incident Response Playbooks skill is designed to assist organizations in developing comprehensive and structured incident response playbooks. It provides a framework for documenting step-by-step procedures tailored to various incident types, ensuring that teams can respond effectively to cybersecurity incidents. The skill is aligned with industry standards such as NIST SP 800-61r3 and SANS PICERL, making it a valuable resource for organizations looking to establish or mature their incident response (IR) programs.
This skill guides users through a systematic workflow that begins with selecting and scoping the incident type. It emphasizes the importance of defining clear trigger conditions and incident-specific procedures. Each playbook follows a consistent structure, including metadata, RACI matrices, detection and triage processes, containment steps, eradication methods, recovery actions, and post-incident analysis. By adhering to this structured approach, organizations can ensure that their response efforts are both thorough and repeatable.
Additionally, the skill includes provisions for integrating with Security Orchestration, Automation and Response (SOAR) platforms, allowing for the automation of response workflows. Users can convert manual playbook steps into automated actions, enhancing the efficiency and speed of incident response. The skill also emphasizes the importance of regular testing and maintenance of playbooks to keep them current and effective against evolving threats.
This skill is particularly useful for cybersecurity professionals, incident response teams, and organizations looking to formalize their incident response processes. It provides the necessary tools and templates to create playbooks that can be utilized across various incident scenarios, ensuring preparedness and compliance with regulatory requirements.
When to use it
Use this skill when establishing or maturing an incident response program, documenting procedures for new incident types, or automating workflows in a SOAR platform.
When not to use it
Do not use this skill for one-time ad hoc investigations, as it focuses on reusable procedure documents rather than case-specific reports.
What you can build with it
Establishing an IR Program
Use this skill to create a comprehensive incident response program from the ground up, ensuring all procedures are documented and standardized.
Documenting New Incident Types
When a novel attack occurs, leverage this skill to quickly document procedures for new incident types, ensuring your team is prepared for future incidents.
Automating Response Workflows
Integrate this skill with a SOAR platform to automate incident response workflows, improving efficiency and reducing response times.
How to install Building Incident Response Playbooks
View source1. Install with the skills CLI
npx skills add mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills/building-incident-response-playbook --agent claude-code2. Or install it manually
Download the skill folder and drop it into ~/.claude/skills/ for all projects, or .claude/skills/ to scope it to one repo. Restart Claude Code so it picks up the new skill.
Anthropic's agentic coding CLI, and the reference implementation of Agent Skills. Drop a skill folder into ~/.claude/skills and Claude Code loads it automatically whenever a task matches the skill's description. Claude Code docs
Inside SKILL.md
Written by mukul975Building Incident Response Playbooks
When to Use
- Establishing or maturing an incident response program from scratch
- Documenting procedures for a new incident type after a novel attack
- Automating response workflows in a SOAR platform (Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR)
- Preparing for compliance audits requiring documented IR procedures (SOC 2, PCI-DSS, HIPAA)
- Conducting a gap analysis of existing IR capabilities against specific threat scenarios
Do not use for one-time ad hoc investigations; playbooks are reusable procedure documents, not case-specific reports.
Prerequisites
- Organizational risk assessment identifying top incident scenarios by likelihood and impact
- NIST SP 800-61r3 or SANS PICERL framework adopted as the organizational IR standard
- Asset inventory with business criticality ratings and data classification
- RACI chart defining roles: Incident Commander, SOC analysts, system administrators, legal, communications
- Existing detection capabilities inventory (SIEM rules, EDR detections, IDS signatures)
- SOAR platform access if building automated playbooks
Workflow
Step 1: Select and Scope the Incident Type
Define the specific scenario the playbook will address:
- Identify the top incident types based on organizational risk assessment and historical data
- Scope each playbook to a single incident type for clarity (do not combine unrelated scenarios)
- Define trigger conditions that activate the playbook
Common playbook types:
Priority Playbooks (build first):
1. Ransomware incident response
2. Phishing/credential compromise
3. Business email compromise
4. Malware infection
5. Data breach/exfiltration
6. DDoS attack
7. Insider threat
8. Account takeover
9. Web application compromise
10. Cloud infrastructure compromise
Step 2: Define the Playbook Structure
Every playbook should follow a consistent structure:
PLAYBOOK TEMPLATE
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
1. Playbook Metadata
- Name, version, owner, last review date
- Trigger conditions
- Severity criteria
2. RACI Matrix
- Who is Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, Informed for each step
3. Detection & Triage
- How the incident is detected
- Initial triage checklist
- Severity classification criteria
4. Containment
- Short-term containment actions
- Long-term containment actions
- Evidence preservation requirements
5. Eradication
- Root cause identification
- Malware/threat removal steps
- Verification procedures
6. Recovery
- System restoration steps
- Validation criteria
- Monitoring requirements post-recovery
7. Post-Incident
- Lessons learned meeting trigger
- Report template
- Detection improvement actions
8. Communication
- Internal notification matrix
- External notification requirements (regulators, customers, law enforcement)
- Status update cadence
9. Appendices
- Tool-specific procedures
- Contact lists
- Evidence collection checklists
Step 3: Write Decision Trees and Escalation Criteria
Define clear decision points with binary outcomes:
Detection Alert Received
├── Is the alert a true positive?
│ ├── YES → Classify severity
│ │ ├── P1 (Critical) → Page incident commander, begin containment immediately
│ │ ├── P2 (High) → Notify IR lead, begin investigation within 30 min
│ │ ├── P3 (Medium) → Queue for investigation within 4 hours
│ │ └── P4 (Low) → Document and investigate within 24 hours
│ └── NO → Document as false positive, tune detection rule
└── Cannot determine → Escalate to Tier 2 for deeper analysis
Escalation triggers:
- Any P1 incident: Immediate escalation to IR lead and CISO
- Data exfiltration confirmed: Legal counsel and privacy officer notified
- Customer data involved: Customer notification process activated
- Third-party involvement: Vendor security contact engaged
- Law enforcement needed: General counsel authorizes before contact
Step 4: Define Specific Technical Procedures
Write tool-specific instructions for each step (not generic guidance):
CONTAINMENT - Endpoint Isolation via CrowdStrike:
1. Open Falcon Console > Hosts > Search for affected hostname
2. Click on the host > Host Details
3. Click "Contain Host" button in upper right
4. Confirm isolation (host will only communicate with CrowdStrike cloud)
5. Document containment action in incident ticket with timestamp
6. Verify containment: Host should show "Contained" status badge
CONTAINMENT - Block C2 Domain at DNS:
1. SSH to DNS server: ssh admin@dns-primary.corp.local
2. Add to block zone: echo "zone evil.com { type master; file /etc/bind/db.sinkhole; };" >> /etc/bind/named.conf.local
3. Reload DNS: rndc reload
4. Verify: dig @dns-primary evil.com (should resolve to sinkhole IP 10.0.0.99)
5. Document blocked domain in incident ticket
Step 5: Integrate with SOAR Platform
Convert manual playbook steps into automated workflows:
- Map each playbook step to a SOAR action (API call, script, human decision point)
- Define automation boundaries (what runs automatically vs. what requires analyst approval)
- Build enrichment automations for the triage phase
- Create containment automations with approval gates for high-impact actions
- Configure notification automations for stakeholder communication
Step 6: Test and Maintain the Playbook
Validate the playbook through exercises and maintain currency:
- Conduct tabletop exercises with the IR team walking through the playbook
- Perform live-fire exercises simulating the incident type in a test environment
- Review and update after every real incident that uses the playbook
- Schedule quarterly reviews for accuracy of contact lists, tool procedures, and escalation paths
- Track playbook metrics: mean time to contain, mean time to resolve, false positive rate
Key Concepts
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Playbook | Documented, repeatable set of procedures for responding to a specific incident type |
| Runbook | More granular than a playbook; step-by-step technical instructions for a specific task within a playbook |
| RACI Matrix | Responsibility assignment chart defining who is Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, and Informed for each activity |
| Decision Tree | Flowchart-based logic defining the response path based on binary conditions at each decision point |
| Escalation Criteria | Predefined conditions that trigger notification of higher-level personnel or external parties |
| SOAR Playbook | Automated workflow in a Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response platform executing playbook steps |
Tools & Systems
- Cortex XSOAR: SOAR platform with visual playbook editor, 700+ integrations, and collaborative War Room
- Splunk SOAR: SOAR platform integrated with Splunk ES, drag-and-drop playbook builder with 2,800+ automated actions
- TheHive: Open-source incident response platform with case templates that function as playbook frameworks
- Confluence / GitLab Wiki: Documentation platforms for maintaining human-readable playbook documents with version control
- Tines: No-code security automation platform for building playbook workflows without programming
Common Scenarios
Scenario: Building a Phishing Response Playbook from Scratch
Context: An organization with a 5-person SOC has no documented phishing response procedure. Analysts handle phishing reports inconsistently.
Approach:
- Interview SOC analysts to document their current ad hoc process
- Define the trigger: user reports phishing email via abuse@ mailbox or phishing button
- Write triage steps: extract email headers, check sender reputation, analyze URLs/attachments in sandbox
- Define containment: quarantine email from all mailboxes, block sender domain, reset passwords if credentials entered
- Build SOAR automation: auto-extract IOCs from reported email, enrich via VirusTotal, create case in TheHive
- Test with simulated phishing email and measure response time improvement
Pitfalls:
- Writing overly generic procedures that don't reference specific tool interfaces or commands
- Not including the communication plan for notifying users who received the phishing email
- Forgetting to define the criteria for when a phishing report becomes a full incident investigation
- Not versioning the playbook or scheduling regular review cycles
Output Format
INCIDENT RESPONSE PLAYBOOK
============================
Playbook Name: Phishing Incident Response
Version: 2.1
Owner: SOC Manager
Last Reviewed: 2025-11-01
Next Review: 2026-02-01
Trigger: Phishing email reported via abuse@corp.com or phish button
RACI MATRIX
Activity | SOC L1 | SOC L2 | IR Lead | Legal | Comms
Initial Triage | R | C | I | |
Email Analysis | R | A | I | |
Containment | | R | A | I |
Credential Reset | | R | A | |
User Notification | | C | A | | R
Regulatory Notification | | | C | R | A
Lessons Learned | C | C | R | I | I
PROCEDURE STEPS
[Detailed steps with tool-specific instructions]
DECISION TREE
[Flowchart logic]
ESCALATION MATRIX
[Conditions and contacts]
METRICS
Target MTTA: 15 minutes
Target MTTC: 1 hour
Target MTTR: 4 hours
Frequently asked questions about Building Incident Response Playbooks
Similar skills
Asset Criticality Scoring for Vulns
Prioritize vulnerabilities based on asset criticality.
Performing Alert Triage with Elastic SIEM
Streamline alert triage processes in Elastic Security.
Active Directory Vulnerability Assessment
Secure your Active Directory with comprehensive assessments.
Active Directory Investigation
Streamline your Active Directory compromise investigations.
Parsing Artifacts with Eric Zimmerman Tools
Efficiently parse Windows forensic artifacts for analysis.
Operationalizing MISP Threat Feeds
Enhance threat detection with curated MISP feeds.
