
Clinical Decision Support
FreeStreamline research documentation for clinical evaluations.
Free · Opens the source repo
What Clinical Decision Support does
The Clinical Decision-Support skill is designed to assist researchers in preparing and validating various clinical evaluation artifacts. It focuses on generating research-only documentation such as evidence profiles, cohort tables, survival analysis plans, and model evaluations. This skill is particularly useful for those involved in clinical research who need to create structured artifacts that adhere to strict governance and privacy standards.
The skill operates within a defined safety boundary, ensuring that all outputs are strictly for research purposes and not intended for patient care or clinical decision-making. It includes templates and scripts that help users frame research questions, select appropriate artifacts, and validate the content before human review. This process enhances transparency and ensures that all documentation meets regulatory and ethical standards.
By using this skill, researchers can efficiently generate drafts of essential clinical decision-support documents while maintaining compliance with privacy regulations. The skill emphasizes the importance of human oversight, requiring expert review for various aspects of the artifacts produced. This ensures that the documentation is not only accurate but also aligns with the intended use and limitations of the research.
Overall, this skill is ideal for clinical researchers, methodologists, and statisticians who require a structured approach to documenting their research findings and evaluations, while ensuring that all outputs are compliant with necessary governance frameworks.
When to use it
Use this skill when preparing research documentation for clinical evaluations, particularly in aggregate or synthetic contexts.
When not to use it
This skill is not suitable for patient care or any clinical operations requiring real-time decision-making.
What you can build with it
Preparing Evidence Profiles
Utilize the evidence profile template to document the quality and strength of evidence for specific clinical questions.
Generating Cohort Tables
Create aggregate cohort tables to summarize patient characteristics while adhering to disclosure controls.
Validating Survival Analysis Plans
Use the survival plan validator script to ensure your survival analysis plan meets predefined criteria before submission.
How to install Clinical Decision Support
View source1. Install with the skills CLI
npx skills add k-dense-ai/scientific-agent-skills/clinical-decision-support --agent claude-code2. Or install it manually
Download the skill folder and drop it into ~/.claude/skills/ for all projects, or .claude/skills/ to scope it to one repo. Restart Claude Code so it picks up the new skill.
Anthropic's agentic coding CLI, and the reference implementation of Agent Skills. Drop a skill folder into ~/.claude/skills and Claude Code loads it automatically whenever a task matches the skill's description. Claude Code docs
Inside SKILL.md
Written by k-dense-aiClinical Decision-Support Research and Evaluation
Hard Safety Boundary
This skill produces research, evaluation, documentation, and governance artifacts only.
Never use it to:
- diagnose or classify a person;
- recommend, select, sequence, start, stop, or modify treatment;
- calculate or communicate a patient-specific dose;
- triage, prioritize, alarm, alert, or determine urgency;
- make or automate a patient-specific clinical decision;
- support bedside, point-of-care, or live clinical operation;
- replace professional judgment or a validated, authorized clinical system;
- claim FDA authorization, regulatory conformity, HIPAA compliance, or legal compliance.
If a request could affect care for a person, stop the workflow and route the matter to a licensed healthcare professional using locally validated and appropriately authorized systems. Do not redirect to another skill for patient-specific care.
In Scope
- Intended-use and limitation statements for research artifacts
- Aggregate cohort table shells with disclosure controls
- Statistical analysis plans and survival-analysis plan review
- Aggregate model or biomarker performance evaluation
- Transparent GRADE evidence-profile checklists
- Evidence-source and decision-logic traceability
- De-identification process checklists
- Fairness, subgroup, calibration, uncertainty, external-validation, monitoring, change-control, audit, and human-factors documentation
Outputs remain drafts until qualified humans approve them. Reporting guidance improves transparency; it does not establish study quality, clinical utility, safety, effectiveness, authorization, or compliance.
Data Gate
Before any script:
- Confirm input is synthetic or aggregate.
- Reject patient rows, records, narratives, identifiers, free text, dates tied to people, images, waveforms, or genomic sequences.
- Keep source files local. Do not fetch URLs, call APIs, read environment variables, or send data to a model.
- Set disclosure thresholds before producing tables.
- Record provenance, data cut date, population, exclusions, missingness, and transformations.
The scripts cap file size, groups, rows, and text length. They reject URL-like paths and common row-level keys. These controls reduce accidental misuse; they are not a privacy determination.
Required Artifact Header
Every artifact must visibly include:
artifact_type, title, version, status, owner, date, and change summary;- intended purpose, intended users, aggregate population scope, and decision role;
- all prohibited uses from the hard boundary;
- data level and confirmation that no PHI or raw rows were supplied;
- limitations, uncertainty, and foreseeable failure modes;
- external-validation and subgroup applicability status;
- human-review roles, completion status, and approval boundary;
- source citations with versions or dates;
- monitoring, change-control, retirement, and audit expectations;
- the statement: Not for patient care or live clinical use.
Start from assets/artifact_intended_use_template.json.
Workflow
1. Frame the Research Question
- Define the estimand or evaluation target before viewing results.
- Distinguish descriptive, prognostic, predictive, diagnostic-accuracy, and causal questions.
- Pre-specify outcomes, time origin, horizon, subgroups, cut points, missing-data handling, multiplicity, and sensitivity analyses.
- Separate exploratory findings from confirmatory analyses.
2. Select the Artifact
| Need | Asset | Script |
|---|---|---|
| Intended-use/governance review | assets/artifact_intended_use_template.json | scripts/validate_cds_artifact.py |
| GRADE evidence profile | assets/evidence_profile_template.json | scripts/evidence_profile_check.py |
| Aggregate model/biomarker evaluation | assets/aggregate_model_evaluation_template.json | scripts/model_biomarker_evaluation.py |
| Aggregate cohort table | assets/aggregate_cohort_table_template.json | scripts/cohort_table_generator.py |
| Survival analysis plan | assets/survival_analysis_plan_template.json | scripts/survival_plan_validator.py |
| Logic traceability matrix | assets/decision_logic_traceability_template.json | scripts/decision_logic_traceability.py |
| De-identification process review | assets/deidentification_checklist_template.json | scripts/deidentification_checklist.py |
3. Run Locally
All helpers are dependency-free:
python3 scripts/validate_cds_artifact.py --help
python3 scripts/evidence_profile_check.py --help
python3 scripts/model_biomarker_evaluation.py --help
python3 scripts/cohort_table_generator.py --help
python3 scripts/survival_plan_validator.py --help
python3 scripts/decision_logic_traceability.py --help
python3 scripts/deidentification_checklist.py --help
Write outputs only to a reviewed local directory. Never place generated reports in an EHR, alerting system, clinical portal, or device workflow.
4. Human Review
Require review proportionate to the artifact:
- methodologist/statistician for design and analysis;
- domain expert for clinical-scientific context;
- privacy officer or qualified expert for disclosure decisions;
- regulatory or legal counsel for jurisdiction-specific interpretations;
- human-factors specialist for user studies;
- authorized governance owner for release and change control.
Script success means only that declared fields and internal consistency checks passed.
GRADE Evidence Profiles
Do not infer a certainty rating from article text, study design alone, p-values, or keywords. Do not use the legacy 1A/2B shorthand as if it were universal GRADE output.
For each important outcome, a human panel must document:
- risk of bias;
- inconsistency;
- indirectness;
- imprecision;
- publication bias;
- any applicable upgrading considerations;
- effect estimate and uncertainty;
- rationale and source IDs for every judgment;
- final certainty judgment and named review role.
The checker validates completeness and citation links only. It never calculates certainty or recommendation strength. See references/evidence_profiles.md.
Aggregate Model and Biomarker Evaluation
Do not derive thresholds, assign molecular or disease classes, match therapies, or emit person-level predictions.
The evaluator accepts only aggregate confusion counts and calibration bins. It reports bounded descriptive metrics with Wilson intervals, calibration gaps, subgroup differences, and explicit suppression. It does not determine fairness, clinical utility, or fitness for use. Require:
- locked model/assay/version and pre-specified threshold provenance;
- representative internal validation and independent external validation;
- calibration and discrimination appropriate to the target;
- subgroup performance with uncertainty and sample sizes;
- missingness, spectrum/selection bias, dataset shift, and assay variability;
- human-factors and prospective evaluation where relevant;
- monitoring, change control, rollback, and retirement criteria.
See references/model_biomarker_evaluation.md.
Cohort Tables
Use aggregate cells only. Do not provide row-level data to the generator.
- Choose the minimum cell threshold under an approved disclosure policy.
- Apply primary and complementary suppression.
- Report denominators and missingness.
- Avoid baseline significance testing as a balance diagnostic.
- Label adjusted, unadjusted, pre-specified, and exploratory results.
- Do not interpret association as causation or clinical actionability.
The default threshold is an operational safeguard, not a HIPAA rule or guarantee. See references/cohort_evaluation.md and references/privacy_and_disclosure.md.
Survival Plans
Define time zero, event, competing events, censoring, intercurrent events, estimand, horizon, effect measure, and analysis population together.
- Assess proportional hazards before treating a hazard ratio as constant.
- Pre-specify alternatives such as time-varying effects or restricted mean survival time.
- Use cumulative-incidence methods when competing events matter.
- Address immortal-time, informative-censoring, delayed-entry, missing-data, and multiplicity risks.
- Include sensitivity analyses and uncertainty, not only p-values.
The bundled helper validates a plan; it does not analyze survival data. See references/survival_analysis.md.
Decision Logic
Only document research or governance logic, such as evidence inclusion, validation gates, release holds, and human-review checkpoints. Each node must link to source IDs, tests, owner, version, and status.
Do not encode care pathways, urgency, medication actions, diagnostic rules, alarms, or patient-facing outputs. See references/decision_logic_traceability.md.
Privacy and De-identification
The HHS methods are Expert Determination and Safe Harbor. A checklist cannot perform either method by itself. Do not claim that removing a list of fields, hashing identifiers, using a minimum cell size, or passing this script proves de-identification or HIPAA compliance.
The helper inventories documented human work. It never reads a dataset. Escalate unresolved items, free text, dates, geography, rare combinations, linkage risk, genomics, and longitudinal patterns to qualified privacy review.
Reporting-Guideline Selection
- Cohort/case-control/cross-sectional: STROBE; add RECORD for routinely collected data.
- Prediction model development/evaluation: TRIPOD+AI and PROBAST+AI.
- Tumor prognostic marker study: REMARK.
- AI diagnostic accuracy: STARD-AI with STARD.
- AI trial protocol: SPIRIT-AI with the current SPIRIT base statement.
- AI randomized trial report: CONSORT-AI with the current CONSORT base statement.
- Early live AI evaluation: DECIDE-AI—but live evaluation is outside this skill's execution scope.
These are reporting or appraisal tools, not automatic quality scores. See references/study_reporting.md.
Regulatory and Governance Context
FDA device status turns on intended use and function, not a document label. FDA's January 2026 CDS guidance distinguishes certain non-device CDS functions from device software functions; its examples are not a self-certification checklist. ONC HTI-1 requirements apply within the defined certification scope. ICH E6(R3) and E9/E9(R1) inform trial governance and statistical planning but do not make an artifact compliant.
Use references/regulatory_and_governance.md for dated context. Obtain qualified advice for an actual product, study, submission, deployment, or jurisdiction.
Verification
From this skill directory:
python3 -m unittest discover -s tests/clinical-decision-support -p 'test_*.py'
Run AST compilation without bytecode:
python3 -c "import ast,pathlib; [ast.parse(p.read_text()) for p in pathlib.Path('scripts').glob('*.py')]"
Reference Map
references/README.md— scope and navigationreferences/safety_and_scope.md— refusal and escalation rulesreferences/regulatory_and_governance.md— FDA, ONC, ICH contextreferences/evidence_profiles.md— human GRADE workflowreferences/study_reporting.md— EQUATOR and PROBAST+AI selectionreferences/cohort_evaluation.md— aggregate cohort methodsreferences/survival_analysis.md— time-to-event planningreferences/model_biomarker_evaluation.md— model/biomarker evaluationreferences/privacy_and_disclosure.md— de-identification and suppressionreferences/decision_logic_traceability.md— governance logicreferences/sources.md— dated authoritative source ledgerreferences/security_validation.md— scan results and accepted LOW findings
Frequently asked questions about Clinical Decision Support
Similar skills
Scientific Problem Selection
Streamline your research problem selection process.
Nextflow Development
Run nf-core bioinformatics pipelines with ease.
Nature Reviewer Assessment
Simulate peer review for scientific manuscripts.
Research Writing Pipeline
Streamline your scientific writing with structured proposal-first methodologies.
Nature Literature Downloader
Efficiently download academic literature from various sources.
Auto Research
Streamline your NeMo-RL experiments with automated workflows.
