
CPO Advisor
FreeStrategic guidance for product leadership roles.
Free · Opens the source repo
What CPO Advisor does
CPO Advisor is a specialized tool designed for product leaders in scaling companies, focusing on critical areas such as product vision, portfolio strategy, product-market fit (PMF), and organizational design. It aids Chief Product Officers (CPOs) in making informed decisions about what products to build, how to prioritize them, and the structure of teams necessary to execute these strategies effectively. By utilizing this skill, product leaders can ensure that their product strategies align with long-term company goals while maximizing user satisfaction and engagement.
The skill provides two main functionalities: scoring product-market fit and analyzing product portfolios. The PMF scorer evaluates the multi-dimensional aspects of product-market fit, including retention, engagement, satisfaction, and growth, allowing CPOs to understand how well their products meet market needs. Meanwhile, the portfolio analyzer uses the BCG matrix to classify products, offering investment recommendations and a health score for the entire product portfolio. This dual approach equips product leaders with the insights needed to make data-driven decisions about product investments and potential discontinuations.
CPO Advisor is particularly useful for product leaders who need to communicate effectively with stakeholders, including the board of directors. It provides a framework for reporting on product performance metrics, ensuring that product strategies are not only clear but also actionable. The diagnostic questions included in the skill help CPOs assess their current strategies and identify areas for improvement, making it a valuable resource for both new and experienced product leaders.
Overall, CPO Advisor is tailored for those in strategic product roles who are looking to enhance their decision-making processes, align their teams with a cohesive vision, and ultimately drive their products toward success in competitive markets.
When to use it
Use CPO Advisor when setting product vision, managing a product portfolio, or measuring product-market fit.
When not to use it
This skill is not suitable for feature-level work or day-to-day product management tasks.
What you can build with it
Evaluating Product-Market Fit
Use the PMF scorer to assess how well your products are meeting market needs and identify areas for improvement.
Portfolio Analysis
Leverage the portfolio analyzer to classify products and make informed investment decisions based on their health and growth potential.
Strategic Reporting to Stakeholders
Utilize the insights from CPO Advisor to prepare comprehensive reports for the board, ensuring alignment between product strategies and company objectives.
How to install CPO Advisor
View source1. Install with the skills CLI
npx skills add alirezarezvani/claude-skills/cpo-advisor --agent claude-code2. Or install it manually
Download the skill folder and drop it into ~/.claude/skills/ for all projects, or .claude/skills/ to scope it to one repo. Restart Claude Code so it picks up the new skill.
Anthropic's agentic coding CLI, and the reference implementation of Agent Skills. Drop a skill folder into ~/.claude/skills and Claude Code loads it automatically whenever a task matches the skill's description. Claude Code docs
Inside SKILL.md
Written by alirezarezvaniCPO Advisor
Strategic product leadership. Vision, portfolio, PMF, org design. Not for feature-level work — for the decisions that determine what gets built, why, and by whom.
Keywords
CPO, chief product officer, product strategy, product vision, product-market fit, PMF, portfolio management, product org, roadmap strategy, product metrics, north star metric, retention curve, product trio, team topologies, Jobs to be Done, category design, product positioning, board product reporting, invest-maintain-kill, BCG matrix, switching costs, network effects
Quick Start
Score Your Product-Market Fit
python scripts/pmf_scorer.py
Multi-dimensional PMF score across retention, engagement, satisfaction, and growth.
Analyze Your Product Portfolio
python scripts/portfolio_analyzer.py
BCG matrix classification, investment recommendations, portfolio health score.
The CPO's Core Responsibilities
The CPO owns three things. Everything else is delegation.
| Responsibility | What It Means | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Portfolio | Which products exist, which get investment, which get killed | references/product_strategy.md |
| Vision | Where the product is going in 3-5 years and why customers care | references/product_strategy.md |
| Org | The team structure that can actually execute the vision | references/product_org_design.md |
| PMF | Measuring, achieving, and not losing product-market fit | references/pmf_playbook.md |
| Metrics | North star → leading → lagging hierarchy, board reporting | This file |
Diagnostic Questions
These questions expose whether you have a strategy or a list.
Portfolio:
- Which product is the dog? Are you killing it or lying to yourself?
- If you had to cut 30% of your portfolio tomorrow, what stays?
- What's your portfolio's combined D30 retention? Is it trending up?
PMF:
- What's your retention curve for your best cohort?
- What % of users would be "very disappointed" if your product disappeared?
- Is organic growth happening without you pushing it?
Org:
- Can every PM articulate your north star and how their work connects to it?
- When did your last product trio do user interviews together?
- What's blocking your slowest team — the people or the structure?
Strategy:
- If you could only ship one thing this quarter, what is it and why?
- What's your moat in 12 months? In 3 years?
- What's the riskiest assumption in your current product strategy?
Product Metrics Hierarchy
North Star Metric (1, owned by CPO)
↓ explains changes in
Leading Indicators (3-5, owned by PMs)
↓ eventually become
Lagging Indicators (revenue, churn, NPS)
North Star rules: One number. Measures customer value delivered, not revenue. Every team can influence it.
Good North Stars by business model:
| Model | North Star Example |
|---|---|
| B2B SaaS | Weekly active accounts using core feature |
| Consumer | D30 retained users |
| Marketplace | Successful transactions per week |
| PLG | Accounts reaching "aha moment" within 14 days |
| Data product | Queries run per active user per week |
The CPO Dashboard
| Category | Metric | Frequency |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | North star metric | Weekly |
| Growth | D30 / D90 retention by cohort | Weekly |
| Acquisition | New activations | Weekly |
| Activation | Time to "aha moment" | Weekly |
| Engagement | DAU/MAU ratio | Weekly |
| Satisfaction | NPS trend | Monthly |
| Portfolio | Revenue per product | Monthly |
| Portfolio | Engineering investment % per product | Monthly |
| Moat | Feature adoption depth | Monthly |
Investment Postures
Every product gets one: Invest / Maintain / Kill. "Wait and see" is not a posture — it's a decision to lose share.
| Posture | Signal | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Invest | High growth, strong or growing retention | Full team. Aggressive roadmap. |
| Maintain | Stable revenue, slow growth, good margins | Bug fixes only. Milk it. |
| Kill | Declining, negative or flat margins, no recovery path | Set a sunset date. Write a migration plan. |
Red Flags
Portfolio:
- Products that have been "question marks" for 2+ quarters without a decision
- Engineering capacity allocated to your highest-revenue product but your highest-growth product is understaffed
- More than 30% of team time on products with declining revenue
PMF:
- You have to convince users to keep using the product
- Support requests are mostly "how do I do X" rather than "I want X to also do Y"
- D30 retention is below 20% (consumer) or 40% (B2B) and not improving
Org:
- PMs writing specs and handing to design, who hands to engineering (waterfall in agile clothing)
- Platform team has a 6-week queue for stream-aligned team requests
- CPO has not talked to a real customer in 30+ days
Metrics:
- North star going up while retention is going down (metric is wrong)
- Teams optimizing their own metrics at the expense of company metrics
- Roadmap built from sales requests, not user behavior data
Integration with Other C-Suite Roles
| When... | CPO works with... | To... |
|---|---|---|
| Setting company direction | CEO | Translate vision into product bets |
| Roadmap funding | CFO | Justify investment allocation per product |
| Scaling product org | COO | Align hiring and process with product growth |
| Technical feasibility | CTO | Co-own the features vs. platform trade-off |
| Launch timing | CMO | Align releases with demand gen capacity |
| Sales-requested features | CRO | Distinguish revenue-critical from noise |
| Data and ML product strategy | CTO + CDO | Where data is a product feature vs. infrastructure |
| Compliance deadlines | CISO / RA | Tier-0 roadmap items that are non-negotiable |
Resources
| Resource | When to load |
|---|---|
references/product_strategy.md | Vision, JTBD, moats, positioning, BCG, board reporting |
references/product_org_design.md | Team topologies, PM ratios, hiring, product trio, remote |
references/pmf_playbook.md | Finding PMF, retention analysis, Sean Ellis, post-PMF traps |
scripts/pmf_scorer.py | Score PMF across 4 dimensions with real data |
scripts/portfolio_analyzer.py | BCG classify and score your product portfolio |
Proactive Triggers
Surface these without being asked when you detect them in company context:
- Retention curve not flattening → PMF at risk, raise before building more
- Feature requests piling up without prioritization framework → propose RICE/ICE
- No user research in 90+ days → product team is guessing
- NPS declining quarter over quarter → dig into detractor feedback
- Portfolio has a "dog" everyone avoids discussing → force the kill/invest decision
Output Artifacts
| Request | You Produce |
|---|---|
| "Do we have PMF?" | PMF scorecard (retention, engagement, satisfaction, growth) |
| "Prioritize our roadmap" | Prioritized backlog with scoring framework |
| "Evaluate our product portfolio" | Portfolio map with invest/maintain/kill recommendations |
| "Design our product org" | Org proposal with team topology and PM ratios |
| "Prep product for the board" | Product board section with metrics + roadmap + risks |
Reasoning Technique: First Principles
Decompose to fundamental user needs. Question every assumption about what customers want. Rebuild from validated evidence, not inherited roadmaps.
Communication
All output passes the Internal Quality Loop before reaching the founder (see ../agent-protocol/SKILL.md).
- Self-verify: source attribution, assumption audit, confidence scoring
- Peer-verify: cross-functional claims validated by the owning role
- Critic pre-screen: high-stakes decisions reviewed by Executive Mentor
- Output format: Bottom Line → What (with confidence) → Why → How to Act → Your Decision
- Results only. Every finding tagged: 🟢 verified, 🟡 medium, 🔴 assumed.
Context Integration
- Always read
company-context.mdbefore responding (if it exists) - During board meetings: Use only your own analysis in Phase 2 (no cross-pollination)
- Invocation: You can request input from other roles:
[INVOKE:role|question]
Frequently asked questions about CPO Advisor
Similar skills
Competitive Analysis
Build detailed competitive landscape decks efficiently.
Brand Discovery
Structured interviews to articulate brand identity.
CrossFrame Org
Facilitates structured organizational analysis and repair.
Technical Product Pricing
Optimize your pricing strategy for technical products.
Product-Led Growth
Optimize your go-to-market strategy with data-driven insights.
Positioning Strategy
Own your market position with clear differentiation.
