
Creating an Endpoint
FreeStreamline your PostHog endpoint creation process.
Free · Opens the source repo
What Creating an Endpoint does
Creating an endpoint skill provides a structured approach to setting up PostHog endpoints that expose saved HogQL queries or insights as callable HTTP routes. This skill guides users through the necessary decisions that affect the endpoint's performance, cost, and usability. By following the outlined steps, users can avoid common pitfalls associated with endpoint creation, such as improper naming conventions, variable misuse, and inappropriate query types.
The skill emphasizes the importance of understanding when to create an endpoint versus using existing insights directly. It outlines the criteria for determining the suitability of endpoints, ensuring that users only create them when necessary, such as when external systems require stable and reusable data. The skill also provides detailed guidance on naming endpoints, selecting the appropriate query kind, and defining variables to ensure that the endpoints are both effective and efficient.
Furthermore, the skill delves into the intricacies of setting data freshness parameters, which influence both the cache behavior and materialization frequency of the endpoint. This allows users to balance the need for up-to-date information with cost considerations. The included reference material on materialization further assists users in making informed decisions about endpoint configuration.
Overall, this skill is tailored for developers and data engineers who need to expose PostHog insights through APIs, ensuring that they do so with the right configurations and best practices in mind.
When to use it
Use this skill when you need to create a new endpoint for a stable query or when exposing insights as APIs for external systems.
When not to use it
Avoid this skill for one-off exploratory analyses or when internal dashboards can directly use insights without the need for additional API surfaces.
What you can build with it
Creating a Stable API for a Mobile App
When a mobile app requires consistent access to PostHog data, this skill helps in setting up a reliable endpoint.
Exposing Insights for a Customer Dashboard
Use this skill to turn existing insights into APIs that can be called by a customer-facing dashboard.
Materializing Heavy Aggregations
For frequently called heavy aggregations, this skill provides guidance on creating efficient materialized endpoints.
How to install Creating an Endpoint
View source1. Install with the skills CLI
npx skills add posthog/posthog/creating-an-endpoint --agent claude-code2. Or install it manually
Download the skill folder and drop it into ~/.claude/skills/ for all projects, or .claude/skills/ to scope it to one repo. Restart Claude Code so it picks up the new skill.
Anthropic's agentic coding CLI, and the reference implementation of Agent Skills. Drop a skill folder into ~/.claude/skills and Claude Code loads it automatically whenever a task matches the skill's description. Claude Code docs
Inside SKILL.md
Written by posthogCreating an endpoint
This skill walks through creating a new endpoint with the right configuration. Endpoints expose saved HogQL or insight queries as callable HTTP routes — the configuration choices made at creation time determine cost, latency, and how callers integrate.
The materialisation deep-dive lives at references/materializing.md. Pull it in when the
materialisation decision is non-obvious.
When to use this skill
- "Create an endpoint for [query]"
- "Expose this insight as an API"
- "Help me turn this HogQL into a callable endpoint"
- A new caller (mobile app, customer-facing dashboard, downstream pipeline) needs PostHog data and the user is choosing how to deliver it
Decisions to make in order
1. Should this even be an endpoint?
Endpoints are right when:
- An external system (someone else's code) needs to call PostHog for data
- The query is stable — not exploratory analysis
- The shape is reusable — same query with different parameters
Endpoints are wrong when:
- An internal PostHog dashboard or insight needs the data — use the insight directly; an endpoint only adds an external API surface you don't need internally
- One-off, exploratory analysis — use the
execute-sqltool (or the SQL editor) directly
Heavy aggregation is not a reason to avoid an endpoint. Endpoints are themselves saved queries, and a heavy, frequently-called aggregation is often the best case for an endpoint with materialisation turned on.
If the user is unsure, ask what's calling the endpoint and what shape they expect.
2. Pick a name
Names are URL-safe (letters, numbers, hyphens, underscores), start with a letter, max 128 chars, must be unique within the project. Lean toward:
- Descriptive over generic —
weekly_active_users_by_orgovermetrics - Snake_case — matches how the name appears in code paths and URLs
- No version in the name — versions are managed by the endpoint itself
- No "endpoint" in the name — redundant
The name appears in the URL: /api/projects/{team_id}/endpoints/{name}/run. It's not
trivially renameable later (callers depend on the path) — get it right at creation.
3. Pick the query kind
Two options exist:
- HogQL (
HogQLQuery) — raw SQL written by the user. Variables defined via{variables.x}syntax, matched oncode_name. Recommended for new endpoints when the caller cares about the exact column shape of the response. - Insight — wraps an existing insight definition. Best supported for
TrendsQuery,LifecycleQuery, andRetentionQuery: these can be materialised, and the breakdown can act as a variable (Trends and Retention only; Lifecycle has no breakdown). Other insight kinds such asFunnelsQuerycan run inline but cannot be materialised and don't expose breakdown variables — rewrite those as HogQL if you need either.
HogQL is the more flexible choice. Pick insight only when the user is genuinely re-publishing an existing insight (see "Creating from an existing insight" below) rather than building a new query.
4. Decide which inputs become variables
Anything that should change per-caller goes in variables; the rest is hard-coded in the query.
For HogQL endpoints, variables are declared in the query payload with code_name, type,
and default. Each execution call passes { "variables": { "<code_name>": value } }.
Common patterns:
- Time windows:
date_from,date_to, or a singlelookback_daysinteger - Identity filters:
user_id,account_id,team_id - Pagination control beyond
limit/offset(these are first-class on the run endpoint already)
For insight endpoints, the breakdown property acts as the variable (Trends and Retention
only — Lifecycle has no breakdown). Pass the breakdown property name as the key. date_from /
date_to are accepted as variables only on non-materialised insight endpoints — a materialised
endpoint bakes its date range into the view, so callers can't shift the window.
Avoid:
- Variables that change the shape of the result — keep the columns stable. If callers need fundamentally different result shapes, ship separate endpoints.
- Variables that bypass safety — don't expose a
where_clausevariable that lets callers inject arbitrary SQL.
Creating from an existing insight
There's no server-side "make an endpoint from insight N" operation. To do it: read the insight's
query (via the insight tools), pass that query to endpoint-create, and set derived_from_insight
to the insight's short id so the origin is recorded. The endpoint then owns its own copy of
the query — later edits to the insight don't propagate. Starting from scratch instead? Build the
query first with the insight / sql-variables tools, then create the endpoint from it.
5. Set data_freshness_seconds
This one field does two jobs, so set it deliberately:
- Cache TTL — results are served from cache until they're this many seconds old.
- Materialisation refresh frequency — on a materialised endpoint, this is also how often the warehouse recomputes the materialised view.
So a lower value means fresher data and more frequent recompute/refresh cost; a higher value is cheaper on both counts but staler.
The value must be one of a fixed set: 900 (15 min), 1800 (30 min), 3600 (1 h), 21600
(6 h), 43200 (12 h), 86400 (24 h, default), 604800 (7 d). There is no sub-15-minute
option — 900 is the floor.
data_freshness_seconds | When to pick it |
|---|---|
| 900–1800 | Freshest available — dashboards where staleness is visible |
| 3600–43200 | Most cases — fresh enough for product usage, cheap to recompute |
| 86400–604800 | Reports, weekly/daily metrics, anything aggregated over long periods |
Bias toward higher values unless the user explicitly needs fresher data. On a materialised endpoint, remember this also sets the refresh cadence.
6. Decide on day-one materialisation
See references/materializing.md for the full decision tree. Short version:
- Recommend materialisation when the endpoint will be called frequently, latency matters, and the user can tolerate staleness equal to the refresh interval (typically 5-15 minutes for scheduled materialisation, or hourly).
- Skip materialisation for low-traffic endpoints, exploratory new endpoints (you don't know yet if it'll get called), and queries where freshness is critical.
If unsure, create unmaterialised and add is_materialized: true later once usage stabilises.
That avoids paying for materialisation on a query nobody ends up calling.
Workflow
- Confirm the use case (step 1 above). If it's not actually a fit for an endpoint, recommend the alternative.
- Agree a name with the user.
- Walk through the query — confirm it's HogQL or insight, and that the columns/shape make sense.
- Identify what should be a variable. Show the user the variable declaration syntax.
- Pick
data_freshness_secondsbased on the user's freshness requirement (ask if not clear) — remembering it also sets the materialisation refresh cadence. - Make the materialisation call. If on the fence, ship without and revisit later.
- Call
endpoint-createwith the agreed config. - Confirm by calling
endpoint-runwith a sample payload to verify the response shape. - Hand off to
consuming-endpoints-from-client-codeif the user is about to wire it up.
Example interaction
User: "I want to expose our monthly active users count as an API
for our analytics partner"
Agent:
- "Quick check: is the partner going to call this on demand, or
should we be pushing data to them? Endpoints are pull-only."
- User: "On demand"
- "Got it. A few choices:
- Name: how about monthly_active_users? Lowercase, descriptive,
no version baggage.
- The query — is it HogQL or are you exposing an existing insight?
HogQL gives you exact column control; insight reuses what you've
already built.
- What should the partner be able to filter by? Org, time window,
both?
- How fresh? If MAU drifts within a day is fine, we can cache
results for 1-24 hours and serve almost everything from cache.
- Materialisation: if the partner is going to hit this many times
per day, materialising it would make responses near-instant.
The trade-off is ~10-15 minute staleness.
What's your starting point on these?"
[user picks: HogQL, lookback_days + org_id variables, 3600s TTL,
not materialised yet]
- endpoint-create monthly_active_users {query, variables, ...}
- endpoint-run with sample payload {org_id: "test", lookback_days: 30}
- "Created and tested. Want help wiring up the client code?
That's consuming-endpoints-from-client-code."
Important notes
- The name lives in the URL. Changing it later requires migrating callers. Pick well.
- HogQL endpoints are more flexible than insight endpoints. Default to HogQL unless the user has a specific reason to wrap an existing insight.
- Variables with no default fail at call time. Always set defaults during creation so the endpoint is testable from the playground without specifying every variable.
- Materialised endpoints require all variables to be passed. Calls without them are
rejected — this is intentional (security: prevents returning unfiltered data). Pair the
materialisation recommendation with a note to the user about which variables become required.
(Optional/partial variables on materialised endpoints are a known limitation the PostHog team
plans to lift — if it's blocking the user, nudge them via the
agent-feedbacktool.) - Don't enable materialisation on a query that isn't eligible. Use
endpoints-materialization-previewfirst to confirm eligibility and see the rejection reason if any. - Endpoints are not stable forever. When the user changes the query, a new version is created
automatically (the old version stays accessible via
?version=N).data_freshness_secondsand materialisation are per-version. Adjust as the endpoint evolves. - Recommend callers pin to a version. Tell the user to call with
?version=Nrather than relying on "latest" — that way a future query edit (which cuts a new version) can't silently change their results. They bump the pinned version deliberately once they've validated the new one. - Share friction via
agent-feedback. If a limitation gets in the way (eligibility rules, required variables, the TTL enum), send the PostHog team a note — it's how the product and these tools improve.
Frequently asked questions about Creating an Endpoint
Similar skills
WinMD API Search
Easily find and explore Windows desktop APIs.
WebMCPify
Transform any web app into an agent-ready platform.
Phoenix Tracing
Instrument LLM applications with OpenInference tracing.
Foundry Hosted Agent CopilotKit
Guidance for developing agentic web apps on Azure.
Power Automate Foundation
Connect AI agents to Power Automate seamlessly.
Power Automate Flow Builder
Efficiently build and deploy Power Automate flows programmatically.
