New to Claude Skills? Learn how to install them →

posthog on GitHub

Debugging CI Failures

Free

Quickly diagnose and classify CI issues in PostHog.

by posthog37.6k stars on posthog/posthog
2 views
Updated Aug 11, 2026
Get this skill

Free · Opens the source repo

What Debugging CI Failures does

The Debugging CI Failures skill is designed specifically for developers working with PostHog's CI/CD pipelines. It helps users diagnose and troubleshoot failing GitHub Actions CI runs by providing insights into the current status of CI, identifying errors, and guiding users through the debugging process. By leveraging the hogli ci:insights command, users can access a comprehensive overview of CI health, including recent failures, their classifications, and any proposed fixes. This skill is particularly useful for developers who need to maintain the stability of their CI environment and quickly resolve issues that arise during the development process.

When a CI failure occurs, the skill allows users to start with the hogli ci:insights command, which aggregates information from past runs and presents it in a digest format. This approach is more efficient than querying the GitHub Actions API directly, which can be slow or rate-limited. Once the user has the insights, they can drill down into specific failures, view logs, and classify issues based on the type of error encountered. The skill emphasizes a read-only approach to avoid unintended changes to the CI environment, ensuring that users can safely investigate problems without affecting ongoing workflows.

This skill is particularly beneficial for teams using GitHub Actions for continuous integration, as it streamlines the debugging process and reduces the time spent on identifying and fixing CI issues. Developers can quickly assess whether CI is functioning correctly or if there are any ongoing problems, allowing them to focus on writing code rather than getting bogged down in CI failures. By providing a structured approach to debugging, the skill enhances the overall efficiency of the development workflow, making it an essential tool for PostHog developers.

When to use it

Use this skill when you encounter a failing CI run in PostHog and need to quickly identify the cause and classify the failure.

When not to use it

This skill is not suitable for fixing CI issues directly; it focuses on diagnosis and classification rather than remediation actions.

What you can build with it

Identifying CI Status

Quickly check the status of the CI pipeline to determine if it is red or green, ensuring that development can proceed smoothly.

Diagnosing a Failing Test

When a specific test fails, use the skill to classify the failure and gather insights on whether it is a regression or a flaky test.

Reviewing CI Insights

Access the `hogli ci:insights` digest to review recent CI health and identify any recurring issues that need attention.

How to install Debugging CI Failures

View source

1. Install with the skills CLI

npx skills add posthog/posthog/debugging-ci-failures --agent claude-code

2. Or install it manually

Download the skill folder and drop it into ~/.claude/skills/ for all projects, or .claude/skills/ to scope it to one repo. Restart Claude Code so it picks up the new skill.

Anthropic's agentic coding CLI, and the reference implementation of Agent Skills. Drop a skill folder into ~/.claude/skills and Claude Code loads it automatically whenever a task matches the skill's description. Claude Code docs

Inside SKILL.md

Written by posthog

Debugging PostHog CI failures

Find the first meaningful failure, classify it, reproduce the smallest useful case locally when appropriate, and report the result. Avoid public-visible or irreversible actions unless the user explicitly asks.

Always start with the hogli ci:insights digest. It is the institutional, cross-run source of truth, and it is fresher and more reliable than scraping gh run list / the GitHub Actions API, which can lag or rate-limit.

This skill triages and classifies. Once a failure is confirmed flaky, hand off to the fixing-flaky-tests skill, which owns local reproduction, root-cause fixing, and N-run validation.

Safety rules

Do not do any of these without explicit approval in the current conversation:

  • Rerun or cancel a GitHub Actions run.
  • Post a GitHub comment, PR review, or issue comment through any CLI, MCP, or API tool.
  • Push commits, force-push, rename branches, or delete branches.
  • Edit .github/workflows/ files (CI infra changes need human review).
  • Merge, close, or reopen the PR.
  • Accept or update snapshots.

Read-only gh calls and read-only GitHub tools are fine. If you need to change local Git state, make sure it is necessary for the task and does not overwrite unrelated work.

Workflow

1. Start with CI insights (always first)

hogli ci:insights is the institutional CI-intelligence backend. It aggregates cross-run history — recurring flakes, occurrence counts, confidence, and any proposed or merged fix — that a single run can't show. Consult it before any raw gh log archaeology; the raw GitHub Actions API can lag or rate-limit, while the insights digest is the freshest aggregated view.

hogli ci:insights                                # digest for the current repo + branch
hogli ci:insights search "<error or test name>"  # match a specific failure
hogli ci:insights view <id>                       # one insight + its remediation actions
hogli ci:insights plan <id>                       # print the recommended fix plan (does not apply it)
  • Broad question ("is CI red?", "is master green today?", "what's broken right now?"): the no-arg digest answers directly — it lists open / in-progress / resolved counts and the most recent insights with severity and confidence. You often do not need a target PR or run at all; report from the digest.
  • Specific failure: run search "<error>" to match it before reading logs. When a matching insight exists, weigh its confidence and occurrence history, and note whether a fix is already merged (the failure may already be resolved on master) or proposed (a plan you can adapt).

hogli ci:insights prints a setup hint if the backend isn't installed or authenticated — if so, fall back to the gh-based inspection below. Surface what you find per the Safety rules — do not auto-apply a fix.

2. Find the failing run (for a specific failure)

Determine the target in this order:

  1. If the user gave a PR number, run ID, check name, or branch, use it.
  2. Otherwise, infer from the current branch with gh pr view --json number,headRefName,statusCheckRollup.
  3. If neither works, ask the user for a PR URL or run ID. Do not guess.

Inspect read-only:

gh pr checks <pr>
gh pr view <pr> --json statusCheckRollup
gh run view <run-id> --json jobs,conclusion,name,workflowName,url
gh run view <run-id> --log-failed

Use the full job log only when --log-failed lacks the failing command or enough surrounding output:

gh run view <run-id> --log --job <job-id>

Extract these before classifying:

  • Workflow name or file, e.g. .github/workflows/ci-backend.yml.
  • Job name, e.g. backend-tests (4/10).
  • Step name, e.g. Run pytest.
  • Failing command and the smallest useful output excerpt.

When scanning logs, search for FAIL, Error, error:, assert, Traceback, exit code, and ##[error]. Stop at the first failing step that explains the run's conclusion. Keep excerpts under 40 lines.

Classification

Signal in the logClassFirst action
AssertionError, test diff, FAILED test_... in a committed test filecode regressionreproduce with hogli test <path>::<test>
Test failed here, passed on master or on rerun in the same PRflaky testconfirm against master history; to fix, use fixing-flaky-tests
ruff, oxlint, stylelint, markdownlint, prettier errorslinthogli lint:python:fix or hogli format on touched files
mypy, pyright, tsc, typescript:check errorstypecheckrun the same checker locally, not the full suite
Chromatic / Storybook / Playwright visual diff, snapshot mismatchsnapshot / visualsurface the diff URL; do NOT auto-accept snapshots
manage.py migrate error, migrations:check failure, missing migrationmigration / schemahogli migrations:check locally
OpenAPI schema diff, generated API types out of synccodegen drifthogli build:openapi
Cannot connect, ECONNREFUSED, OOM, runner killed, setup step timeoutinfra / runnertreat as transient; report, do not fix
apt-get, uv sync, pnpm install, docker pull, setup action failuresenvironment / setupdiff .nvmrc, pyproject.toml, package.json, Dockerfiles
hogli lint:skills, hogli build:skills failureskills buildrun the same hogli command locally
SDK compat check, ci-survey-sdk-check, cross-version failureSDK compatibilitycheck SDK version matrix for the affected package

If multiple signals match, choose the most specific class. For example, prefer codegen drift over lint, migration over typecheck, and snapshot / visual over a generic Playwright test failure.

Local reproduction

Run only the narrowest command that exercises the failure. If the command shape is unclear, read .agents/skills/hogli/SKILL.md and hogli <command> --help.

ClassRepro guidance
code regressionhogli test path/to/test.py::TestClass::test_method or hogli test <file.test.ts>
flaky testHand off to the fixing-flaky-tests skill.
lintUse the failing formatter/linter on touched files, e.g. hogli format:python.
typecheckRun the failing checker, e.g. pnpm --filter=@posthog/frontend typescript:check.
snapshot / visualRun the specific Playwright or Storybook workflow; read playwright-test if needed.
migration / schemahogli migrations:check; run migrations only if the user agrees.
codegen drifthogli build:openapi.
infra / runnerNo local repro. Report and stop.
environment / setupReproduce the setup step only if cheap and relevant to changed files.
skills buildhogli lint:skills; if that passes, hogli build:skills.

Do NOT run hogli test with no arguments. Do NOT run hogli nuke or hogli dev:reset as a shortcut. Do NOT bypass hooks with --no-verify.

PostHog CI notes

  • Most PostHog jobs run on depot-ubuntu-latest or depot-ubuntu-latest-16. Depot runs surface logs through the GitHub Actions UI / gh run view just like standard GitHub-hosted runners. There is no separate Depot console that agents can query in this environment.
  • If a job fails before Checkout completes (no app code ran), classify as infra / runner. Do not propose code fixes.
  • PostHog CI frequently parallelizes the same test class across N shards (backend-tests (3/10) style). Reproduce from the specific failing test path, not the shard index.

Report shape

Keep the response short. Include one likely-cause sentence and avoid deeper speculation.

Target: PR #<num> - run <run-id> (<workflow file>)
Failing job:   <job name>
Failing step:  <step name>
Command:       <failing command>
Excerpt:
  <up to 40 lines, trimmed around the failure>

Classification: <class from the table>
Shadow run:     <yes | no>
Likely cause:   <one sentence>
Local repro:    <exact command, or "none">
Next action (needs your approval):
  - <push fix | rerun job | update snapshot | none>

If the classification is infra / runner or a shadow run, say so and stop; do not propose a code change.

Frequently asked questions about Debugging CI Failures

Similar skills