
Detecting Privilege Escalation in Kubernetes Pods
FreeEnhance Kubernetes security by detecting privilege escalation risks.
Free · Opens the source repo
What Detecting Privilege Escalation in Kubernetes Pods does
This skill provides a comprehensive approach to detecting and preventing privilege escalation in Kubernetes pods, an essential aspect of securing containerized applications. By integrating admission control mechanisms, runtime monitoring, and audit log analysis, it helps identify when a pod or container gains unauthorized elevated permissions. This is crucial for maintaining the integrity of your Kubernetes environment and ensuring that pods do not operate beyond their intended security context.
The skill leverages Open Policy Agent (OPA) policies for admission control, allowing users to enforce strict security policies that prevent the deployment of pods with dangerous configurations. Additionally, it utilizes runtime monitoring tools like Falco to detect suspicious activity in real-time, such as the execution of setuid binaries or the gaining of elevated Linux capabilities. By combining these methods, users can effectively monitor and respond to potential security incidents that may arise from privilege escalation attempts.
This skill is particularly valuable for security operations center (SOC) analysts, DevSecOps teams, and Kubernetes administrators who are responsible for hardening pod security policies and investigating security incidents. It provides structured procedures for analyzing privilege escalation threats, making it easier to validate security monitoring coverage and ensure compliance with best practices in Kubernetes security.
In summary, this skill is a vital tool for anyone looking to enhance their Kubernetes security posture by proactively identifying and mitigating privilege escalation risks within their containerized applications.
When to use it
Use this skill when investigating potential security incidents involving Kubernetes pods or when establishing detection rules for privilege escalation threats.
When not to use it
This skill may not be suitable for environments without Kubernetes or for users who do not have access to the necessary monitoring tools like Falco or OPA.
What you can build with it
Investigating Security Incidents
Use this skill to analyze Kubernetes pods when investigating potential security breaches related to privilege escalation.
Establishing Security Policies
Implement OPA policies to enforce strict admission controls that prevent the deployment of pods with dangerous configurations.
Real-time Monitoring
Leverage runtime monitoring with Falco to detect and respond to suspicious activities in your Kubernetes environment.
How to install Detecting Privilege Escalation in Kubernetes Pods
View source1. Install with the skills CLI
npx skills add mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills/detecting-privilege-escalation-in-kubernetes-pods --agent claude-code2. Or install it manually
Download the skill folder and drop it into ~/.claude/skills/ for all projects, or .claude/skills/ to scope it to one repo. Restart Claude Code so it picks up the new skill.
Anthropic's agentic coding CLI, and the reference implementation of Agent Skills. Drop a skill folder into ~/.claude/skills and Claude Code loads it automatically whenever a task matches the skill's description. Claude Code docs
Inside SKILL.md
Written by mukul975Detecting Privilege Escalation in Kubernetes Pods
Overview
Privilege escalation in Kubernetes occurs when a pod or container gains elevated permissions beyond its intended scope. This includes running as root, using privileged mode, mounting host filesystems, enabling dangerous Linux capabilities, or exploiting kernel vulnerabilities. Detection combines admission control (prevention), runtime monitoring (detection), and audit logging (investigation).
When to Use
- When investigating security incidents that require detecting privilege escalation in kubernetes pods
- When building detection rules or threat hunting queries for this domain
- When SOC analysts need structured procedures for this analysis type
- When validating security monitoring coverage for related attack techniques
Prerequisites
- Kubernetes cluster v1.25+ (Pod Security Admission support)
- kubectl with cluster-admin access
- Falco or similar runtime security tool
- OPA Gatekeeper or Kyverno for admission policies
Privilege Escalation Vectors in Kubernetes
| Vector | Risk | Detection Method |
|---|---|---|
| privileged: true | Full host access | Admission control + audit |
| hostPID: true | Access host processes | Admission control |
| hostNetwork: true | Access host network stack | Admission control |
| hostPath volumes | Read/write host filesystem | Admission control |
| SYS_ADMIN capability | Near-privileged access | Admission + runtime |
| allowPrivilegeEscalation: true | setuid/setgid exploitation | Admission control |
| runAsUser: 0 | Container root | Admission control |
| automountServiceAccountToken | Token theft for API access | Admission control |
| Writable /proc or /sys | Kernel parameter manipulation | Runtime monitoring |
Detection with Admission Control
Pod Security Admission (Built-in)
# Enforce restricted policy on namespace
apiVersion: v1
kind: Namespace
metadata:
name: production
labels:
pod-security.kubernetes.io/enforce: restricted
pod-security.kubernetes.io/enforce-version: latest
pod-security.kubernetes.io/audit: restricted
pod-security.kubernetes.io/warn: restricted
OPA Gatekeeper Policies
# Block dangerous capabilities
apiVersion: templates.gatekeeper.sh/v1
kind: ConstraintTemplate
metadata:
name: k8sdangerouspriv
spec:
crd:
spec:
names:
kind: K8sDangerousPriv
targets:
- target: admission.k8s.gatekeeper.sh
rego: |
package k8sdangerouspriv
dangerous_caps := {"SYS_ADMIN", "SYS_PTRACE", "SYS_MODULE", "DAC_OVERRIDE", "NET_ADMIN", "NET_RAW"}
violation[{"msg": msg}] {
container := input.review.object.spec.containers[_]
cap := container.securityContext.capabilities.add[_]
dangerous_caps[cap]
msg := sprintf("Container %v adds dangerous capability: %v", [container.name, cap])
}
violation[{"msg": msg}] {
container := input.review.object.spec.containers[_]
container.securityContext.privileged == true
msg := sprintf("Container %v runs in privileged mode", [container.name])
}
violation[{"msg": msg}] {
container := input.review.object.spec.containers[_]
container.securityContext.allowPrivilegeEscalation == true
msg := sprintf("Container %v allows privilege escalation", [container.name])
}
violation[{"msg": msg}] {
input.review.object.spec.hostPID == true
msg := "Pod uses host PID namespace"
}
violation[{"msg": msg}] {
input.review.object.spec.hostNetwork == true
msg := "Pod uses host network"
}
Runtime Detection with Falco
# /etc/falco/rules.d/privesc-detection.yaml
- rule: Setuid Binary Execution in Container
desc: Detect execution of setuid/setgid binaries in a container
condition: >
spawned_process and container and
(proc.name in (su, sudo, newgrp, chsh, passwd) or
proc.is_exe_upper_layer=true)
output: >
Setuid/setgid binary executed in container
(user=%user.name container=%container.name image=%container.image.repository
command=%proc.cmdline parent=%proc.pname)
priority: WARNING
tags: [container, privilege-escalation, T1548]
- rule: Capability Gained in Container
desc: Detect when a process gains elevated capabilities
condition: >
evt.type = capset and container and
evt.arg.cap != ""
output: >
Process gained capabilities in container
(container=%container.name image=%container.image.repository
capabilities=%evt.arg.cap command=%proc.cmdline)
priority: WARNING
tags: [container, privilege-escalation, T1548.001]
- rule: Container with Dangerous Capabilities Started
desc: Detect container launched with dangerous capabilities
condition: >
container_started and container and
(container.image.repository != "registry.k8s.io/pause") and
(container.cap_effective contains SYS_ADMIN or
container.cap_effective contains SYS_PTRACE or
container.cap_effective contains SYS_MODULE)
output: >
Container with dangerous capabilities
(container=%container.name image=%container.image.repository
caps=%container.cap_effective)
priority: CRITICAL
tags: [container, privilege-escalation, T1068]
- rule: Write to /etc/passwd in Container
desc: Detect writes to /etc/passwd inside container
condition: >
open_write and container and fd.name = /etc/passwd
output: >
Write to /etc/passwd in container
(container=%container.name image=%container.image.repository
command=%proc.cmdline user=%user.name)
priority: CRITICAL
tags: [container, privilege-escalation, T1136]
Kubernetes Audit Log Detection
# audit-policy.yaml - Capture privilege escalation events
apiVersion: audit.k8s.io/v1
kind: Policy
rules:
# Log pod creation with security context details
- level: RequestResponse
resources:
- group: ""
resources: ["pods"]
verbs: ["create", "update", "patch"]
# Log privilege escalation attempts
- level: RequestResponse
resources:
- group: "rbac.authorization.k8s.io"
resources: ["clusterroles", "clusterrolebindings", "roles", "rolebindings"]
verbs: ["create", "update", "patch", "bind", "escalate"]
# Log service account token requests
- level: Metadata
resources:
- group: ""
resources: ["serviceaccounts/token"]
verbs: ["create"]
Query Audit Logs for Privilege Escalation
# Find pods created with privileged security context
kubectl logs -n kube-system kube-apiserver-* | \
jq 'select(.verb == "create" and .objectRef.resource == "pods") |
select(.requestObject.spec.containers[].securityContext.privileged == true)'
# Find RBAC escalation attempts
kubectl logs -n kube-system kube-apiserver-* | \
jq 'select(.objectRef.resource == "clusterrolebindings" and .verb == "create")'
Investigation Playbook
# Check pod security context
kubectl get pod <pod-name> -n <ns> -o jsonpath='{.spec.containers[*].securityContext}'
# Check effective capabilities
kubectl exec <pod-name> -n <ns> -- cat /proc/1/status | grep -i cap
# List pods running as root
kubectl get pods --all-namespaces -o json | \
jq '.items[] | select(.spec.containers[].securityContext.runAsUser == 0 or .spec.containers[].securityContext.privileged == true) | {name: .metadata.name, ns: .metadata.namespace}'
# Check for hostPath volumes
kubectl get pods --all-namespaces -o json | \
jq '.items[] | select(.spec.volumes[]?.hostPath != null) | {name: .metadata.name, ns: .metadata.namespace, paths: [.spec.volumes[].hostPath.path]}'
Best Practices
- Enable Pod Security Admission at
restrictedlevel for production namespaces - Drop ALL capabilities and add back only what is needed
- Set allowPrivilegeEscalation: false on all containers
- Run as non-root (runAsNonRoot: true, runAsUser > 0)
- Disable automountServiceAccountToken unless API access is needed
- Monitor with Falco for runtime privilege escalation attempts
- Audit RBAC changes with Kubernetes audit logging
- Use seccomp profiles to restrict syscalls
Frequently asked questions about Detecting Privilege Escalation in Kubernetes Pods
Similar skills
Asset Criticality Scoring for Vulns
Prioritize vulnerabilities based on asset criticality.
Performing Alert Triage with Elastic SIEM
Streamline alert triage processes in Elastic Security.
Active Directory Vulnerability Assessment
Secure your Active Directory with comprehensive assessments.
Active Directory Investigation
Streamline your Active Directory compromise investigations.
Parsing Artifacts with Eric Zimmerman Tools
Efficiently parse Windows forensic artifacts for analysis.
Operationalizing MISP Threat Feeds
Enhance threat detection with curated MISP feeds.
