What Eyeball does
Eyeball is a Python-based tool designed to enhance document analysis by providing visual evidence alongside textual claims. When you invoke Eyeball, it generates a Word document that includes inline screenshots from the source material, ensuring that every factual assertion is backed by visual proof. This is particularly useful for researchers, analysts, and anyone who needs to verify claims made in documents or online sources. By providing a clear visual reference, Eyeball helps users confirm the accuracy of the information they are working with.
The skill supports various document formats, including Word documents, PDFs, and RTF files, as well as publicly accessible web pages. This flexibility allows users to analyze a wide range of materials, making it an invaluable tool for those who frequently engage in document review or fact-checking. The output document not only highlights the relevant sections of text but also includes screenshots that correspond to each claim, making it easy to verify the information at a glance.
To use Eyeball effectively, users must follow a structured workflow that includes extracting text, writing precise analyses, and selecting verbatim anchors for screenshots. This process ensures that the analysis is accurate and that the visual evidence directly supports each claim. The skill emphasizes the importance of attention to detail, requiring users to reference specific section and page numbers from the source material to maintain accuracy in their analyses.
Overall, Eyeball is an essential tool for professionals who require rigorous verification of claims in documents. Its combination of textual analysis and visual proof streamlines the process of document review, making it easier to substantiate findings and conclusions with credible evidence.
When to use it
Use Eyeball when you need to analyze documents or web pages and require visual confirmation of the claims made within them.
When not to use it
Eyeball may not be suitable for casual reading or analysis where visual proof is not necessary, or for documents that do not support the required formats.
What you can build with it
Academic Research
Researchers can use Eyeball to validate claims in academic papers by providing visual proof of citations.
Legal Document Review
Lawyers can analyze contracts and legal documents, ensuring that every claim is substantiated with screenshots.
Content Fact-Checking
Journalists can verify information from online articles, using Eyeball to provide visual evidence for their reports.
How to install Eyeball
View source1. Install with the skills CLI
npx skills add github/awesome-copilot/eyeball --agent claude-code2. Or install it manually
Download the skill folder and drop it into ~/.claude/skills/ for all projects, or .claude/skills/ to scope it to one repo. Restart Claude Code so it picks up the new skill.
Anthropic's agentic coding CLI, and the reference implementation of Agent Skills. Drop a skill folder into ~/.claude/skills and Claude Code loads it automatically whenever a task matches the skill's description. Claude Code docs
Inside SKILL.md
Written by githubEyeball
Analyze documents with visual proof. When activated, Eyeball produces a Word document on the user's Desktop where every factual assertion includes an inline screenshot from the source material with the cited text highlighted in yellow.
Activation
When the user invokes this skill (e.g., "use eyeball", "run eyeball on this", "eyeball this document"), respond with:
Eyeball is active. I'll analyze the document and produce a Word doc with inline source screenshots so you can verify every claim with your own eyes.
Then follow the workflow below.
Supported Sources
- Local files: Word documents (.docx, .doc), PDFs (.pdf), RTF files
- Web URLs: Any publicly accessible web page
Tool Location
The Eyeball Python utility is located at:
<plugin_dir>/skills/eyeball/tools/eyeball.py
To find the actual path, run:
find ~/.copilot/installed-plugins -name "eyeball.py" -path "*/eyeball/*" 2>/dev/null
If not found there, check the project directory or the user's home directory for the eyeball repo.
First-Run Setup
Before first use, check that dependencies are installed:
python3 <path-to>/eyeball.py setup-check
If anything is missing, install the required dependencies:
pip3 install pymupdf pillow python-docx playwright
python3 -m playwright install chromium
On Windows, also install pywin32 for Word automation:
pip install pywin32
Workflow
Follow these steps exactly. The order matters.
Step 1: Read the source text
Before writing any analysis, extract and read the full text of the source document:
python3 <path-to>/eyeball.py extract-text --source "<path-or-url>"
Read the output carefully. Identify actual section numbers, headings, page numbers, and key language.
CRITICAL: Do not skip this step. Do not write analysis based on assumptions about how the document is structured. Read the actual text.
Step 2: Write analysis with exact citations
For each point in your analysis, you must:
- Reference the correct section number as it appears in the document (e.g., "Section 9" not "Section 8" because you assumed the numbering).
- Reference the correct page number where the section appears in the extracted text.
- Select anchors that are verbatim phrases from the source that directly support your claim.
Step 3: Select anchors correctly
This is the most important step. Anchors determine what gets highlighted in the screenshots.
DO:
- Use verbatim phrases from the source text that directly support your assertion
- Use multiple anchors to span the full range of text the reader should see
- Use specific, uncommon phrases that appear only where you intend
DO NOT:
- Use generic topic labels (e.g., "Confidentiality") that appear throughout the document
- Use section titles alone when they appear as cross-references elsewhere
- Use single common words that match in many places
Examples:
WRONG -- uses a generic topic label that matches everywhere:
{"anchors": ["User-Generated Content"], "target_page": 8}
RIGHT -- uses the specific language that supports the claim:
{"anchors": ["retain ownership", "Ownership of Content, Right to Post"], "target_page": 8}
WRONG -- section title appears as a cross-reference on earlier pages:
{"anchors": ["LIMITATION OF LIABILITY"]}
RIGHT -- includes the section number for precision, targets the correct page:
{"anchors": ["12. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY", "INDIRECT", "CONSEQUENTIAL"], "target_page": 13}
Step 4: Build the analysis document
Construct a JSON array of sections and call the build command:
python3 <path-to>/eyeball.py build \
--source "<path-or-url>" \
--output ~/Desktop/<title>.docx \
--title "Analysis Title" \
--subtitle "Source description" \
--sections '[
{
"heading": "1. Section Title",
"analysis": "Your analysis text here. Reference Section X on page Y...",
"anchors": ["verbatim phrase 1", "verbatim phrase 2"],
"target_page": 5,
"context_padding": 40
},
{
"heading": "2. Another Section",
"analysis": "More analysis...",
"anchors": ["exact quote from source"],
"target_pages": [10, 11],
"context_padding": 50
}
]'
Section object fields:
heading(required): Section heading in the output documentanalysis(required): Your analysis textanchors(required): List of verbatim phrases from the source to search for and highlighttarget_page(optional): Single page number (1-indexed) to search ontarget_pages(optional): List of page numbers to search across (screenshots stitched vertically)context_padding(optional): Padding in PDF points above/below the anchor region (default: 40). Increase for more context.
Step 5: Deliver the output
Save the output to the user's Desktop. Tell the user the filename and that they can open it to verify each claim against the highlighted source screenshots.
Self-Check Before Delivery
Before saving the final document, mentally verify:
- Does each section's analysis text reference the correct section number from the source?
- Are the anchors verbatim phrases that appear on the target page?
- Does each anchor directly support the claim in the analysis, not just relate to the same topic?
- If the screenshot doesn't match the analysis, is the analysis wrong or is the anchor wrong? Fix whichever is incorrect.
Notes
- The output document includes highlighted screenshots that are dynamically sized. If you provide multiple anchors, the screenshot expands to cover all of them.
- When a search term is not found, the output document will note this. If this happens, the anchor was likely not verbatim enough. Adjust and rebuild.
- For web pages, Playwright renders the page to PDF first. The resulting page numbers may differ from what you see in a browser. Use the extracted text output (step 1) to determine correct page numbers.
- If the user has already provided the source text or you have already read it in the current conversation, you can skip step 1. But always verify section numbers and page references against the actual text before writing analysis.
Frequently asked questions about Eyeball
Similar skills
Account Research
Efficiently gather insights on companies using Common Room data.
Last 30 Days Research
Analyze recent community and social trends in 30 days.
Last 30 Days
Research trending discussions across platforms in the last month.
NotebookLM Research Assistant
Query Google NotebookLM for precise, citation-backed answers.
Customer Research
Streamline multi-source customer inquiries with confidence scoring.
Research Router
Streamline your research with a hybrid classification approach.

