
Go Benchmarking
FreeMeasure and optimize Go application performance effectively.
Free · Opens the source repo
What Go Benchmarking does
The Go Benchmarking skill focuses on the essential aspects of performance measurement for Go applications. It provides a structured workflow for writing benchmarks, running them, and analyzing the results with statistical rigor. By utilizing tools like benchstat and pprof, developers can gain insights into the performance of their code, identify bottlenecks, and make informed decisions for optimizations. This skill is designed for Go developers who want to ensure their applications run efficiently and reliably.
With this skill, you will learn how to properly structure your benchmark tests and utilize the latest features in Go, such as b.Loop(), which enhances the accuracy of your benchmarks by preventing dead code elimination. The skill emphasizes the importance of controlled conditions and statistical analysis, ensuring that any conclusions drawn from benchmarking are sound and reliable. It also covers how to track performance regressions in Continuous Integration (CI) environments, making it easier to maintain performance standards over time.
The Go Benchmarking skill is particularly useful for performance measurement engineers and developers looking to optimize their Go applications. It provides clear guidelines on how to document performance results in commits, ensuring that any changes made for optimization purposes are well recorded and understood by the team. This skill is not just about running benchmarks; it's about cultivating a culture of performance awareness and continuous improvement in Go development.
When to use it
Use this skill when you need to measure, analyze, and improve the performance of your Go applications.
When not to use it
This skill may not be suitable for quick performance checks or when working with non-Go applications.
What you can build with it
Optimizing a Go Web Service
Use this skill to benchmark and profile a web service, identifying slow endpoints and optimizing them for better response times.
CI Performance Regression Tracking
Implement this skill in your CI pipeline to automatically detect performance regressions whenever new code is merged.
Analyzing Memory Usage
Leverage the memory tracking features of this skill to analyze and reduce memory allocations in your Go applications.
How to install Go Benchmarking
View source1. Install with the skills CLI
npx skills add samber/cc-skills-golang/golang-benchmark --agent claude-code2. Or install it manually
Download the skill folder and drop it into ~/.claude/skills/ for all projects, or .claude/skills/ to scope it to one repo. Restart Claude Code so it picks up the new skill.
Anthropic's agentic coding CLI, and the reference implementation of Agent Skills. Drop a skill folder into ~/.claude/skills and Claude Code loads it automatically whenever a task matches the skill's description. Claude Code docs
Inside SKILL.md
Written by samberPersona: You are a Go performance measurement engineer. You never draw conclusions from a single benchmark run — statistical rigor and controlled conditions are prerequisites before any optimization decision.
Thinking mode: Use ultrathink for benchmark analysis, profile interpretation, and performance comparison tasks. Deep reasoning prevents misinterpreting profiling data and ensures statistically sound conclusions.
Dependencies:
- benchstat:
go install golang.org/x/perf/cmd/benchstat@latest
Go Benchmarking & Performance Measurement
Performance improvement does not exist without measures — if you can measure it, you can improve it.
This skill covers the full measurement workflow: write a benchmark, run it, profile the result, compare before/after with statistical rigor, and track regressions in CI. For optimization patterns to apply after measurement, → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-performance skill. For pprof setup on running services, → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-troubleshooting skill.
Writing Benchmarks
File and Ordering Conventions
Benchmark functions live in a _bench_test.go file named after the source file under benchmark, not after the individual function — parser.go -> parser_bench_test.go, containing BenchmarkParse, BenchmarkEncode, etc., not a separate benchmarkparse_test.go per function. Keeping benchmarks in their own file (instead of mixed into parser_test.go) keeps go test -bench=. ./pkg/parser output free of unrelated Test* noise, and separates fixtures sized for measurement (large inputs, long-lived setup) from those sized for correctness — the two rarely share the same shape. The file still follows Go's one-test-file-per-source-file convention (→ See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-testing skill), just with the _bench suffix marking its narrower purpose.
Order Benchmark* functions inside parser_bench_test.go to mirror the order of the functions/methods they measure in parser.go — a reader comparing the two files top to bottom should find BenchmarkParse at the same relative position as Parse.
b.Loop() (Go 1.24+) — preferred
For Go 1.24+, prefer b.Loop() for new benchmarks. It times only the loop body and keeps function arguments/results alive, which reduces dead-code-elimination mistakes.
func BenchmarkParse(b *testing.B) {
data := loadFixture("large.json") // setup — excluded from timing
for b.Loop() {
Parse(data) // compiler cannot eliminate this call
}
}
Legacy b.N loops still compile and are fine to keep when preserving existing benchmarks or supporting Go <1.24. They are easier to get wrong: setup may need b.ResetTimer(), and results may need a sink if the compiler can eliminate the work. Go 1.26 fixed an earlier b.Loop() inlining limitation — benchmarks on 1.24–1.25 already benefit from b.Loop() but may miss inlining optimizations that 1.26 delivers.
Memory tracking
func BenchmarkAlloc(b *testing.B) {
b.ReportAllocs() // or run with -benchmem flag
var sink []byte
for b.Loop() {
sink = make([]byte, 1024)
}
_ = sink
}
b.ReportMetric() adds custom metrics (e.g., throughput):
b.ReportMetric(float64(totalBytes)/b.Elapsed().Seconds(), "bytes/s") // b.Elapsed() is only valid inside b.Loop()
Sub-benchmarks and table-driven
func BenchmarkEncode(b *testing.B) {
for _, size := range []int{64, 256, 4096} {
b.Run(fmt.Sprintf("size=%d", size), func(b *testing.B) {
data := make([]byte, size)
for b.Loop() {
Encode(data)
}
})
}
}
Running Benchmarks
go test -bench=BenchmarkEncode -benchmem -count=10 ./pkg/... | tee bench.txt
| Flag | Purpose |
|---|---|
-bench=. | Run all benchmarks (regexp filter) |
-benchmem | Report allocations (B/op, allocs/op) |
-count=10 | Run 10 times for statistical significance |
-benchtime=3s | Minimum time per benchmark (default 1s) |
-cpu=1,2,4 | Run with different GOMAXPROCS values |
-cpuprofile=cpu.prof | Write CPU profile |
-memprofile=mem.prof | Write memory profile |
-trace=trace.out | Write execution trace |
Output format: BenchmarkEncode/size=64-8 5000000 230.5 ns/op 128 B/op 2 allocs/op — the -8 suffix is GOMAXPROCS, ns/op is time per operation, B/op is bytes allocated per op, allocs/op is heap allocation count per op.
Comparing Optimization Variants in Parallel
When several competing optimization hypotheses exist for the same bottleneck, implement each variant in its own isolated worktree (EnterWorktree) via a separate sub-agent, so their code changes never collide in the shared working tree.
Run the benchmarks serially, not concurrently. Concurrent benchmark runs share the same CPU — the noisy-neighbor effect contaminates ns/op and reintroduces the exact statistical noise -count and benchstat exist to eliminate. Implementing in parallel is safe (isolated worktrees, no file contention); measuring in parallel is not (shared hardware, real contention). Run each variant's benchmark one at a time, back in the main tree or sequentially per worktree.
Compare every variant's benchstat output against the same baseline report, keep the winner, and ExitWorktree (remove) the rest.
Documenting Results in Commits
Paste benchstat output in the commit body when the change has a measurable performance impact. This documents why an optimization was made, prevents future readers from reverting it, and lets reviewers verify the claim without re-running benchmarks.
Commit format:
perf(parser): reduce Parse allocations 50% with sync.Pool
Replace per-call []byte allocation with a pooled buffer.
goos: linux / goarch: amd64 / cpu: AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
│ old │ new │
│ sec/op │ sec/op vs base │
Parse-32 4.592µ ± 2% 3.041µ ± 1% -33.78% (p=0.000 n=10)
│ old │ new │
│ B/op │ B/op vs base │
Parse-32 1.024Ki ± 0% 0.512Ki ± 0% -50.00% (p=0.000 n=10)
│ old │ new │
│ allocs/op │ allocs/op vs base │
Parse-32 12.00 ± 0% 6.000 ± 0% -50.00% (p=0.000 n=10)
Rules:
- Only include benchmarks directly affected by the change — strip unrelated rows
- Never paste results with
~(no statistical significance) — the improvement cannot be claimed - Include the hardware context line (
goos/goarch/cpu) so results are reproducible - Use
perf(scope):commit type for performance-only changes
Profiling from Benchmarks
Generate profiles directly from benchmark runs — no HTTP server needed:
# CPU profile
go test -bench=BenchmarkParse -cpuprofile=cpu.prof ./pkg/parser
go tool pprof cpu.prof
# Memory profile (alloc_objects shows GC churn, inuse_space shows leaks)
go test -bench=BenchmarkParse -memprofile=mem.prof ./pkg/parser
go tool pprof -alloc_objects mem.prof
# Execution trace
go test -bench=BenchmarkParse -trace=trace.out ./pkg/parser
go tool trace trace.out
For full pprof CLI reference (all commands, non-interactive mode, profile interpretation), see pprof Reference. For execution trace interpretation, see Trace Reference. For statistical comparison, see benchstat Reference.
Reference Files
-
pprof Reference — Interactive and non-interactive analysis of CPU, memory, and goroutine profiles. Full CLI commands, profile types (CPU vs allocobjects vs inuse_space), web UI navigation, and interpretation patterns. Use this to dive deep into _where time and memory are being spent in your code.
-
benchstat Reference — Statistical comparison of benchmark runs with rigorous confidence intervals and p-value tests. Covers output reading, filtering old benchmarks, interleaving results for visual clarity, and regression detection. Use this when you need to prove a change made a meaningful performance difference, not just a lucky run.
-
Trace Reference — Execution tracer for understanding when and why code runs. Visualizes goroutine scheduling, garbage collection phases, network blocking, and custom span annotations. Use this when pprof (which shows where CPU goes) isn't enough — you need to see the timeline of what happened.
-
Diagnostic Tools — Quick reference for ancillary tools: fieldalignment (struct padding waste), GODEBUG (runtime logging flags), fgprof (frame graph profiles), race detector (concurrency bugs), and others. Use this when you have a specific symptom and need a focused diagnostic — don't reach for pprof if a simpler tool already answers your question.
-
Compiler Analysis — Low-level compiler optimization insights: escape analysis (when values move to the heap), inlining decisions (which function calls are eliminated), SSA dump (intermediate representation), and assembly output. Use this when benchmarks show allocations you didn't expect, or when you want to verify the compiler did what you intended.
-
CI Regression Detection — Automated performance regression gating in CI pipelines. Covers three tools (benchdiff for quick PR comparisons, cob for strict threshold-based gating, gobenchdata for long-term trend dashboards), noisy neighbor mitigation strategies (why cloud CI benchmarks vary 5-10% even on quiet machines), and self-hosted runner tuning to make benchmarks reproducible. Use this when you want to ensure pull requests don't silently slow down your codebase — detecting regressions early prevents shipping performance debt.
-
Investigation Session — Production performance troubleshooting workflow combining Prometheus runtime metrics (heap size, GC frequency, goroutine counts), PromQL queries to correlate metrics with code changes, runtime configuration flags (GODEBUG env vars to enable GC logging), and cost warnings (when you're hitting performance tax). Use this when production benchmarks look good but real traffic behaves differently.
-
Prometheus Go Metrics Reference — Complete listing of Go runtime metrics actually exposed as Prometheus metrics by
prometheus/client_golang. Covers 30 default metrics, 40+ optional metrics (Go 1.17+), process metrics, and common PromQL queries. Distinguishes betweenruntime/metrics(Go internal data) and Prometheus metrics (what you scrape from/metrics). Use this when setting up monitoring dashboards or writing PromQL queries for production alerts.
Cross-References
- → See
samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-performanceskill for optimization patterns to apply after measuring ("if X bottleneck, apply Y") - → See
samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-troubleshootingskill for pprof setup on running services (enable, secure, capture), Delve debugger, GODEBUG flags, root cause methodology - → See
samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-observabilityskill for everyday always-on monitoring, continuous profiling (Pyroscope), distributed tracing (OpenTelemetry) - → See
samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-testingskill for general testing practices - → See
samber/cc-skills@promql-cliskill for querying Prometheus runtime metrics in production to validate benchmark findings
Frequently asked questions about Go Benchmarking
Similar skills
Heap Snapshot Analysis
Investigate V8 heap snapshots for memory issues.
VS Code Performance Workflow
Automate performance investigations in VS Code.
Memory Leak Audit
Prevent memory leaks with effective coding patterns.
CPU Profile Analysis
Analyze V8 and Chrome performance profiles for optimization.
Chat Performance Testing
Benchmark and validate chat UI performance in VS Code.
Vercel React Best Practices
Optimize your React and Next.js applications for performance.
