New to Claude Skills? Learn how to install them →

mukul975 on GitHub

Hunting Advanced Persistent Threats

Free

Proactively hunt APT activity in enterprise environments.

Get this skill

Free · Opens the source repo

What Hunting Advanced Persistent Threats does

The Hunting Advanced Persistent Threats skill is designed for cybersecurity professionals who need to conduct thorough investigations into potential APT activities within their organizations. This skill leverages hypothesis-driven searches across various data sources, including endpoint telemetry, network logs, and memory artifacts, to identify signs of compromise. By utilizing frameworks like MITRE ATT&CK, users can develop targeted hypotheses based on known adversary behaviors and test these against their environment.

To effectively use this skill, cybersecurity teams should have a robust endpoint detection and response (EDR) platform in place, along with access to relevant telemetry data. The skill guides users through a structured workflow, starting from hypothesis development to executing hunts with tools like Velociraptor or osquery. This systematic approach ensures that threat hunters can validate the presence of known TTPs (tactics, techniques, and procedures) and respond appropriately to any findings.

The skill is particularly useful during scheduled threat hunting cycles or when investigating anomalies flagged by user and entity behavior analytics (UEBA) systems. It helps organizations stay ahead of potential threats by validating their defenses against emerging APT tactics. Additionally, it can be employed when peer organizations report active compromises, allowing teams to assess their own exposure and readiness.

While this skill is powerful for proactive hunting, it is not a substitute for incident response. In the event of a confirmed breach, users must escalate to established incident response procedures. By integrating this skill into their cybersecurity toolkit, organizations can enhance their threat detection capabilities and improve their overall security posture.

When to use it

Utilize this skill during proactive threat hunting cycles or when investigating flagged anomalies from UEBA systems.

When not to use it

Do not use this skill during active incident response; escalate to incident response procedures instead.

What you can build with it

Proactive Threat Hunting Cycle

Use this skill during scheduled threat hunting sprints to validate defenses against newly published APT intelligence.

Investigating Anomalous Behavior

Activate this skill when a UEBA alert flags behavioral deviations that warrant deeper investigation.

Assessing Exposure After Reports

Employ this skill when peer organizations report active APT compromises to validate your own exposure.

How to install Hunting Advanced Persistent Threats

View source

1. Install with the skills CLI

npx skills add mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills/hunting-advanced-persistent-threats --agent claude-code

2. Or install it manually

Download the skill folder and drop it into ~/.claude/skills/ for all projects, or .claude/skills/ to scope it to one repo. Restart Claude Code so it picks up the new skill.

Anthropic's agentic coding CLI, and the reference implementation of Agent Skills. Drop a skill folder into ~/.claude/skills and Claude Code loads it automatically whenever a task matches the skill's description. Claude Code docs

Inside SKILL.md

Written by mukul975

Hunting Advanced Persistent Threats

When to Use

Use this skill when:

  • Conducting proactive threat hunting sprints (typically 2–4 week cycles) based on newly published APT intelligence
  • A UEBA alert or anomaly detection system flags behavioral deviations warranting deeper investigation
  • A peer organization or ISAC sharing partner reports active APT compromise and you need to validate your own exposure

Do not use this skill as a substitute for incident response when a confirmed breach is in progress — escalate to IR procedures (NIST SP 800-61).

Prerequisites

  • EDR platform with telemetry retention (CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, or SentinelOne) covering 30+ days
  • Access to MITRE ATT&CK Navigator for hypothesis development
  • Network flow data (NetFlow, Zeek, or Suricata logs) in a queryable SIEM
  • Threat hunting platform or query interface (Velociraptor, osquery fleet, or Splunk ES)

Workflow

Step 1: Develop Hunt Hypothesis

Select a threat actor relevant to your sector using MITRE ATT&CK Groups (https://attack.mitre.org/groups/). Review the group's known TTPs mapped to ATT&CK techniques. Example hypothesis: "APT29 (Cozy Bear) uses spearphishing with ISO attachments (T1566.001) and living-off-the-land binaries (T1218) — test for unusual mshta.exe and rundll32.exe parent-child relationships."

Document hypothesis using the Threat Hunting Loop framework: hypothesis → data collection → pattern analysis → response.

Step 2: Identify Required Data Sources

Map each ATT&CK technique to required log sources using the ATT&CK Data Sources taxonomy:

  • Process creation (T1059): Windows Security Event 4688 or Sysmon Event ID 1
  • Network connections (T1071): Zeek conn.log, NetFlow, EDR network telemetry
  • Registry modifications (T1547): Sysmon Event ID 13, Windows Security 4657
  • Memory injection (T1055): EDR memory scan telemetry, Volatility output

Verify log coverage using ATT&CK Coverage Calculator or a custom data source matrix.

Step 3: Execute Hunts with Velociraptor or osquery

Velociraptor VQL hunt for unusual PowerShell execution:

SELECT Pid, Ppid, Name, CommandLine, CreateTime
FROM pslist()
WHERE Name =~ "powershell.exe"
AND CommandLine =~ "-enc|-nop|-w hidden"

osquery for persistence via scheduled tasks:

SELECT name, action, enabled, path
FROM scheduled_tasks
WHERE action NOT LIKE '%System32%'
AND enabled = 1;

Splunk SPL for lateral movement via PsExec:

index=windows EventCode=7045 ServiceFileName="*PSEXESVC*"
| stats count by ComputerName, ServiceName, ServiceFileName

Step 4: Analyze Results and Pivot

For each anomaly identified, pivot across dimensions:

  • Temporal: Did this occur before or after known IOC timestamps?
  • Host: How many endpoints exhibit this behavior?
  • User: Is the associated account a service account, privileged user, or regular user?
  • Network: Does the host communicate with external IPs not in baseline?

Apply the Diamond Model (adversary, capability, infrastructure, victim) to structure findings.

Step 5: Document and Operationalize Findings

If hunting reveals confirmed malicious activity, activate IR procedures. If hunting reveals a gap (hunt found nothing but data coverage was insufficient), document the coverage gap and remediate.

Convert successful hunt queries into SIEM detection rules using Sigma format for portability across platforms.

Key Concepts

TermDefinition
TTPTactics, Techniques, and Procedures — adversary behavioral patterns as defined in MITRE ATT&CK
Diamond ModelAnalytical framework with four vertices (adversary, capability, infrastructure, victim) used to structure intrusion analysis
Living-off-the-Land (LotL)Attacker technique using legitimate OS tools (PowerShell, WMI, certutil) to evade detection
UEBAUser and Entity Behavior Analytics — ML-based detection of anomalous behavior baselines
SigmaOpen standard for SIEM-agnostic detection rule format, analogous to YARA for network/log detection
Hunt HypothesisA testable prediction about adversary presence based on threat intelligence and environmental knowledge

Tools & Systems

  • Velociraptor: Open-source DFIR platform with VQL query language for scalable endpoint hunting across thousands of systems
  • osquery: SQL-based OS instrumentation framework for real-time endpoint telemetry queries
  • MITRE ATT&CK Navigator: Web-based tool for visualizing ATT&CK coverage and technique prioritization
  • Zeek (formerly Bro): Network traffic analyzer producing structured logs (conn, dns, http, ssl) suitable for hunting
  • Elastic Security: EQL (Event Query Language) enables sequence-based hunting for multi-stage attack patterns
  • Sigma: Detection rule format with translators for Splunk, QRadar, Sentinel, and Elastic

Common Pitfalls

  • Confirmation bias: Starting a hunt expecting to find something and interpreting benign data as malicious. Document null results — they validate controls.
  • Insufficient data retention: Many APT techniques require 90+ days of log history to identify slow-and-low patterns. Default retention periods are often too short.
  • Hunting without baselines: Cannot identify anomalies without knowing normal. Spend time on baseline documentation before hunting.
  • Query performance impact: Broad queries against production SIEM during business hours can degrade analyst workflows. Schedule intensive hunts during off-peak hours.
  • Ignoring false positives systematically: Track false positive rates per query. Queries with >80% FP rate should be refined or retired before operationalization.

Frequently asked questions about Hunting Advanced Persistent Threats

Similar skills