
Implementing Policy as Code
FreeEnforce security policies in Kubernetes and CI/CD pipelines.
Free · Opens the source repo
What Implementing Policy as Code does
This skill provides a comprehensive framework for implementing policy-as-code using Open Policy Agent (OPA) and Gatekeeper within Kubernetes environments. It is designed for developers and security engineers who need to enforce organizational policies programmatically across Kubernetes clusters. The skill guides users through the process of writing Rego policies, deploying OPA Gatekeeper as an admission controller, and integrating these policies into CI/CD pipelines to ensure compliance at every stage of development.
The workflow begins with the installation of OPA Gatekeeper using Helm, followed by the creation of Constraint Templates that define the specific policies to enforce. These templates can cover a wide range of compliance requirements, such as ensuring that Kubernetes resources have the necessary labels or that containers do not run in privileged mode. Users can then apply these constraints to their Kubernetes resources, effectively blocking any non-compliant configurations from being created.
For testing, the skill includes instructions on using tools like conftest to validate Kubernetes manifests and other configurations against the defined policies. This allows developers to catch policy violations early in the development process, promoting a secure software development lifecycle (SDLC). Additionally, the skill outlines how to integrate policy testing into CI/CD workflows, ensuring that every pull request is evaluated against the established security policies before being merged.
Overall, this skill is essential for teams looking to standardize security practices across their Kubernetes environments and CI/CD pipelines, enabling a proactive approach to policy enforcement and governance.
When to use it
Use this skill when you need to enforce security policies across Kubernetes clusters and integrate policy checks into CI/CD pipelines.
When not to use it
This skill is not suitable for vulnerability scanning or runtime threat detection; use dedicated tools for those purposes.
What you can build with it
Enforcing Security Policies
Use this skill to ensure that all Kubernetes resources comply with your organization's security policies before they are created.
Integrating Policy Checks in CI/CD
Incorporate policy validation into your CI/CD pipelines to automatically check for compliance on pull requests.
Testing Policies Locally
Leverage conftest to test your Kubernetes manifests against OPA policies locally before deploying them.
How to install Implementing Policy as Code
View source1. Install with the skills CLI
npx skills add mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills/implementing-policy-as-code-with-open-policy-agent --agent claude-code2. Or install it manually
Download the skill folder and drop it into ~/.claude/skills/ for all projects, or .claude/skills/ to scope it to one repo. Restart Claude Code so it picks up the new skill.
Anthropic's agentic coding CLI, and the reference implementation of Agent Skills. Drop a skill folder into ~/.claude/skills and Claude Code loads it automatically whenever a task matches the skill's description. Claude Code docs
Inside SKILL.md
Written by mukul975Implementing Policy as Code with Open Policy Agent
When to Use
- When enforcing organizational security policies across Kubernetes clusters programmatically
- When requiring admission control that blocks non-compliant resources from being created
- When implementing policy governance that can be version-controlled, tested, and audited
- When standardizing security rules across multiple clusters and environments
- When needing a flexible policy engine that extends beyond Kubernetes to APIs and CI/CD
Do not use for vulnerability scanning (use Trivy/Checkov), for runtime threat detection (use Falco), or for network policy enforcement (use Kubernetes NetworkPolicy or Calico).
Prerequisites
- Kubernetes cluster with admin access for Gatekeeper installation
- Helm for Gatekeeper deployment
- OPA CLI or conftest for local policy testing
- Rego knowledge for policy authoring
Workflow
Step 1: Install OPA Gatekeeper
# Install Gatekeeper via Helm
helm repo add gatekeeper https://open-policy-agent.github.io/gatekeeper/charts
helm install gatekeeper gatekeeper/gatekeeper \
--namespace gatekeeper-system --create-namespace \
--set replicas=3 \
--set audit.replicas=1 \
--set audit.writeToRAMDisk=true
Step 2: Create Constraint Templates
# templates/k8s-required-labels.yaml
apiVersion: templates.gatekeeper.sh/v1
kind: ConstraintTemplate
metadata:
name: k8srequiredlabels
spec:
crd:
spec:
names:
kind: K8sRequiredLabels
validation:
openAPIV3Schema:
type: object
properties:
labels:
type: array
items:
type: string
targets:
- target: admission.k8s.gatekeeper.sh
rego: |
package k8srequiredlabels
violation[{"msg": msg}] {
provided := {label | input.review.object.metadata.labels[label]}
required := {label | label := input.parameters.labels[_]}
missing := required - provided
count(missing) > 0
msg := sprintf("Missing required labels: %v", [missing])
}
---
# templates/k8s-container-limits.yaml
apiVersion: templates.gatekeeper.sh/v1
kind: ConstraintTemplate
metadata:
name: k8scontainerlimits
spec:
crd:
spec:
names:
kind: K8sContainerLimits
validation:
openAPIV3Schema:
type: object
properties:
cpu:
type: string
memory:
type: string
targets:
- target: admission.k8s.gatekeeper.sh
rego: |
package k8scontainerlimits
violation[{"msg": msg}] {
container := input.review.object.spec.containers[_]
not container.resources.limits.cpu
msg := sprintf("Container %v has no CPU limit", [container.name])
}
violation[{"msg": msg}] {
container := input.review.object.spec.containers[_]
not container.resources.limits.memory
msg := sprintf("Container %v has no memory limit", [container.name])
}
---
# templates/k8s-block-privileged.yaml
apiVersion: templates.gatekeeper.sh/v1
kind: ConstraintTemplate
metadata:
name: k8sblockprivileged
spec:
crd:
spec:
names:
kind: K8sBlockPrivileged
targets:
- target: admission.k8s.gatekeeper.sh
rego: |
package k8sblockprivileged
violation[{"msg": msg}] {
container := input.review.object.spec.containers[_]
container.securityContext.privileged == true
msg := sprintf("Privileged container not allowed: %v", [container.name])
}
violation[{"msg": msg}] {
container := input.review.object.spec.initContainers[_]
container.securityContext.privileged == true
msg := sprintf("Privileged init container not allowed: %v", [container.name])
}
Step 3: Apply Constraints
# constraints/require-labels.yaml
apiVersion: constraints.gatekeeper.sh/v1beta1
kind: K8sRequiredLabels
metadata:
name: require-team-labels
spec:
enforcementAction: deny
match:
kinds:
- apiGroups: [""]
kinds: ["Namespace"]
- apiGroups: ["apps"]
kinds: ["Deployment", "StatefulSet"]
excludedNamespaces:
- kube-system
- gatekeeper-system
parameters:
labels:
- "team"
- "environment"
- "cost-center"
---
# constraints/block-privileged.yaml
apiVersion: constraints.gatekeeper.sh/v1beta1
kind: K8sBlockPrivileged
metadata:
name: block-privileged-containers
spec:
enforcementAction: deny
match:
kinds:
- apiGroups: [""]
kinds: ["Pod"]
- apiGroups: ["apps"]
kinds: ["Deployment", "DaemonSet", "StatefulSet"]
excludedNamespaces:
- kube-system
Step 4: Test Policies with conftest
# Install conftest
brew install conftest
# Test Kubernetes manifests against OPA policies locally
conftest test deployment.yaml --policy policies/ --output json
# Test Terraform against OPA policies
conftest test terraform/main.tf --policy policies/terraform/ --parser hcl2
# Test Dockerfiles
conftest test Dockerfile --policy policies/docker/
# policies/kubernetes/deny_latest_tag.rego
package kubernetes
deny[msg] {
input.kind == "Deployment"
container := input.spec.template.spec.containers[_]
endswith(container.image, ":latest")
msg := sprintf("Container %v uses :latest tag. Pin to specific version.", [container.name])
}
deny[msg] {
input.kind == "Deployment"
container := input.spec.template.spec.containers[_]
not contains(container.image, ":")
msg := sprintf("Container %v has no tag. Pin to specific version.", [container.name])
}
Step 5: Integrate Policy Testing in CI/CD
# .github/workflows/policy-test.yml
name: Policy Validation
on:
pull_request:
paths: ['k8s/**', 'terraform/**', 'policies/**']
jobs:
conftest:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- name: Install conftest
run: |
wget -q https://github.com/open-policy-agent/conftest/releases/download/v0.50.0/conftest_0.50.0_Linux_x86_64.tar.gz
tar xzf conftest_0.50.0_Linux_x86_64.tar.gz
sudo mv conftest /usr/local/bin/
- name: Test K8s manifests
run: conftest test k8s/**/*.yaml --policy policies/kubernetes/ --output json
- name: Test Terraform
run: conftest test terraform/*.tf --policy policies/terraform/ --parser hcl2
Key Concepts
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| OPA | Open Policy Agent — general-purpose policy engine using Rego language for policy decisions |
| Rego | OPA's declarative query language for writing policy rules |
| Gatekeeper | Kubernetes-native OPA integration implementing admission control via ConstraintTemplates |
| ConstraintTemplate | CRD defining the Rego policy logic and parameters schema for a class of constraints |
| Constraint | Instance of a ConstraintTemplate with specific parameters and scope (which resources to check) |
| Admission Controller | Kubernetes component that intercepts API requests before persistence and can allow or deny them |
| conftest | CLI tool for testing structured data (YAML, JSON, HCL) against OPA policies |
Tools & Systems
- Open Policy Agent (OPA): General-purpose policy engine for unified policy enforcement
- Gatekeeper: Kubernetes admission controller built on OPA with CRD-based configuration
- conftest: Testing framework for OPA policies against configuration files
- Kyverno: Alternative Kubernetes policy engine using YAML-based policies (no Rego required)
- Styra DAS: Commercial OPA management platform with policy authoring, testing, and distribution
Common Scenarios
Scenario: Enforcing Container Security Standards Across Clusters
Context: Multiple development teams deploy to shared Kubernetes clusters. Some teams run privileged containers and images without resource limits, causing security and stability issues.
Approach:
- Deploy Gatekeeper on all clusters via GitOps (Helm chart in a FluxCD repository)
- Create ConstraintTemplates for: no privileged containers, required resource limits, required labels, no latest tag
- Start with
enforcementAction: warnto identify violations without blocking deployments - Notify teams of violations and provide a 2-week remediation window
- Switch to
enforcementAction: denyafter the remediation period - Add
excludedNamespacesfor kube-system and monitoring namespaces
Pitfalls: Deploying Gatekeeper with deny mode immediately can break existing workloads. Always start with warn mode. Overly restrictive policies without exemptions for system namespaces can prevent cluster components from functioning.
Output Format
OPA Policy Evaluation Report
==============================
Cluster: production-east
Date: 2026-02-23
Gatekeeper Version: 3.16.0
CONSTRAINT SUMMARY:
K8sRequiredLabels: 12 violations (warn)
K8sBlockPrivileged: 0 violations (deny)
K8sContainerLimits: 8 violations (deny)
K8sBlockLatestTag: 3 violations (deny)
BLOCKED DEPLOYMENTS (deny):
[K8sContainerLimits] deployment/api-server in ns/payments
- Container 'api' has no memory limit
[K8sBlockLatestTag] deployment/frontend in ns/web
- Container 'nginx' uses :latest tag
AUDIT VIOLATIONS (warn):
[K8sRequiredLabels] namespace/staging
- Missing labels: {cost-center}
Frequently asked questions about Implementing Policy as Code
Similar skills
Data Breach Blast Radius Analyzer
Assess potential breach impacts before they occur.
Verify Agent Action
Ensure safe execution of AI agent actions with thorough reviews.
Agent Supply Chain Integrity
Ensure the integrity of AI agent plugins and tools.
Agent OWASP ASI Compliance Check
Ensure your AI agents meet OWASP ASI security standards.
Securing S3 Buckets
Enhance your S3 bucket security with AWS best practices.
AWS Account Enumeration with ScoutSuite
Assess AWS security posture with comprehensive audits.
