Improving MCP tools

An MCP server gets better only in ways you can measure. This skill is the campaign procedure: score the current agent experience, fix the biggest problem, re-score, and only ship changes the numbers justify. It is the operating manual for the "improve my MCP" loop — one iteration per pass, journaled so a later iteration (or a different agent) can resume without repeating work.

The objective function

services/mcp/evals/ is the harness. benchmark/tasks.yaml is a fixed set of agent tasks with expected_tools and success_criteria; scores are only comparable across runs of the same benchmark version.

• Probe mode (deterministic, no LLM): LIVE_MCP_URL=... LIVE_MCP_TOKEN=... pnpm exec tsx evals/runner/probe.ts --out score.json from services/mcp/. Reports tool-presence misses (discoverability), probe failures, and latency p50/p95. Non-zero exit = regression.
• Agent mode (LLM replay + judge): scores task success and tool-selection accuracy. Use it for description/discoverability changes — probes cannot detect that an agent picks the wrong tool.

Run the harness against a seeded local or devbox stack, never against a customer project. Local recipe: NODE_ENV=development PORT=9876 POSTHOG_API_BASE_URL=http://localhost:8000 pnpm dev:hono, personal API key as LIVE_MCP_TOKEN.

One iteration

1. Measure. Run the harness for a baseline. Pull production evidence with the MCP analytics tools (query-mcp-tool-stats, query-mcp-tool-failures, query-mcp-tool-descriptions, query-mcp-tool-sample-intents) and the lenses in the signals scout cookbook (products/signals/skills/signals-scout-mcp-tool-calls/references/queries.md): failure leaderboard, retry/struggle, latency, intents that matched no tool.
2. Pick one issue. Rank by reach × severity. Skip anything the journal shows with two failed attempts. One issue per iteration — a PR that fixes three things can't be attributed to any of them when scores move.
3. Fix, bounded. Only files inside the allowlist (below). Typical fixes: sharpen a tool description so the right intent finds it, tighten an input schema that agents keep getting wrong, fix an annotation, update a skill.
4. Validate. Re-run the affected benchmark slice plus a no-regression sample. Keep the change only if the target metric improves and nothing else degrades. A discarded change is a normal outcome — journal it and move on.
5. Ship. One PR per iteration with before/after scores in the body (format in references/campaign-journal.md). Keep it stampable: ≤400 changed lines, only files inside the allowlist below, apply the stamphog label. Autonomy level comes from the campaign config — default is draft PR for human review; only arm auto-merge when the operator has explicitly enabled the self-driving experiment (see guardrails).
6. Journal. Append the iteration record before ending the pass.

Hard guardrails

These are not suggestions; violating any of them ends the campaign pass.

• Allowlist — a campaign PR may only touch: products/*/mcp/tools.yaml, products/*/skills/**, services/mcp/evals/**, the codegen outputs of pnpm generate-tools / scaffold-yaml (services/mcp/src/tools/generated/** and services/mcp/schema/generated-tool-definitions.json), and docs. Anything else (handler code, package manifests, workflows, migrations, auth paths) → stop and hand the finding to a human as a draft PR or report instead.
• Read-only against data. The harness and all production queries are read-only. Never create, mutate, or delete customer-visible objects while measuring.
• Evidence or it didn't happen. No PR without a baseline score, an after score, and the exact harness commands used.
• Benchmark integrity. Never edit benchmark/tasks.yaml in the same PR as a fix it validates — changing the exam and the answer together proves nothing. Benchmark changes are their own PR and bump version.
• Budgets. Respect the operator's iteration/token/PR caps (default: stop after 3 open unmerged campaign PRs). Two failed attempts on an issue parks it permanently.
• Kill switch. If the campaign config, its feature flag, or the operator says stop — stop mid-iteration, journal state, end cleanly.

Failure modes to expect

• A description change that helps one intent can steal traffic from the right tool for another — that's why the no-regression sample is mandatory. The intent-cluster snapshot's tool_overlaps (see exploring-mcp-intent-clusters) lists exactly which pairs compete for which intents: snapshot it before a description rewrite and recompute after, and treat a capture shift in an overlapping pair as the regression signal.
• Probe latency varies with stack warmth; compare medians across ≥3 runs before attributing a latency change to your fix.
• Tool-presence misses can be feature-flag gating, not catalog absence — check getToolsForFeatures gating before "fixing" discoverability.