
LLM Application Patterns
FreeDesign and implement robust LLM applications with proven patterns.
Free ยท Opens the source repo
What LLM Application Patterns does
The LLM Application Patterns skill provides a structured approach to building applications powered by large language models (LLMs). It offers production-ready patterns that are informed by industry best practices and tools like Dify. This skill is particularly useful for developers and designers who are looking to create AI applications that rely on LLMs, implement Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) strategies, or build AI agents. By utilizing these patterns, users can streamline their application development process and ensure they are following effective methodologies.
One of the key features of this skill is its focus on RAG pipeline architecture, which integrates document ingestion, retrieval, and response generation. The skill outlines various chunking strategies for document ingestion, allowing users to choose methods that best suit their data. Additionally, it provides guidance on embedding and storage options, detailing different vector databases and embedding models, helping users make informed decisions based on their specific use cases.
The skill also covers agent architectures, including the ReAct pattern, which combines reasoning and action to enhance the capabilities of AI agents. By following the provided templates and examples, users can implement sophisticated agent behaviors that improve interaction and decision-making processes. Overall, this skill serves as a comprehensive resource for anyone involved in the design and development of LLM-powered applications, ensuring they have access to the necessary patterns and strategies to succeed.
When to use it
Use this skill when you are developing LLM applications, especially if you need to implement RAG strategies or build AI agents.
When not to use it
This skill may not be suitable for simple applications that do not require LLM capabilities or for users looking for a quick, one-off solution without the need for structured patterns.
What you can build with it
Building a RAG Application
Utilize the RAG pipeline architecture to create applications that provide accurate responses based on user queries and relevant data.
Designing AI Agents
Implement the ReAct pattern to develop AI agents that can reason and act based on the information they retrieve.
Setting Up LLM Observability
Follow the guidelines provided to establish effective monitoring for LLM applications, ensuring they perform as expected.
How to install LLM Application Patterns
View source1. Install with the skills CLI
npx skills add davila7/claude-code-templates/llm-app-patterns --agent claude-code2. Or install it manually
Download the skill folder and drop it into ~/.claude/skills/ for all projects, or .claude/skills/ to scope it to one repo. Restart Claude Code so it picks up the new skill.
Anthropic's agentic coding CLI, and the reference implementation of Agent Skills. Drop a skill folder into ~/.claude/skills and Claude Code loads it automatically whenever a task matches the skill's description. Claude Code docs
Inside SKILL.md
Written by davila7๐ค LLM Application Patterns
Production-ready patterns for building LLM applications, inspired by Dify and industry best practices.
When to Use This Skill
Use this skill when:
- Designing LLM-powered applications
- Implementing RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation)
- Building AI agents with tools
- Setting up LLMOps monitoring
- Choosing between agent architectures
1. RAG Pipeline Architecture
Overview
RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) grounds LLM responses in your data.
โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ
โ Ingest โโโโโโถโ Retrieve โโโโโโถโ Generate โ
โ Documents โ โ Context โ โ Response โ
โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ
โ โ โ
โผ โผ โผ
โโโโโโโโโโโ โโโโโโโโโโโโโ โโโโโโโโโโโโโ
โ Chunkingโ โ Vector โ โ LLM โ
โEmbeddingโ โ Search โ โ + Contextโ
โโโโโโโโโโโ โโโโโโโโโโโโโ โโโโโโโโโโโโโ
1.1 Document Ingestion
# Chunking strategies
class ChunkingStrategy:
# Fixed-size chunks (simple but may break context)
FIXED_SIZE = "fixed_size" # e.g., 512 tokens
# Semantic chunking (preserves meaning)
SEMANTIC = "semantic" # Split on paragraphs/sections
# Recursive splitting (tries multiple separators)
RECURSIVE = "recursive" # ["\n\n", "\n", " ", ""]
# Document-aware (respects structure)
DOCUMENT_AWARE = "document_aware" # Headers, lists, etc.
# Recommended settings
CHUNK_CONFIG = {
"chunk_size": 512, # tokens
"chunk_overlap": 50, # token overlap between chunks
"separators": ["\n\n", "\n", ". ", " "],
}
1.2 Embedding & Storage
# Vector database selection
VECTOR_DB_OPTIONS = {
"pinecone": {
"use_case": "Production, managed service",
"scale": "Billions of vectors",
"features": ["Hybrid search", "Metadata filtering"]
},
"weaviate": {
"use_case": "Self-hosted, multi-modal",
"scale": "Millions of vectors",
"features": ["GraphQL API", "Modules"]
},
"chromadb": {
"use_case": "Development, prototyping",
"scale": "Thousands of vectors",
"features": ["Simple API", "In-memory option"]
},
"pgvector": {
"use_case": "Existing Postgres infrastructure",
"scale": "Millions of vectors",
"features": ["SQL integration", "ACID compliance"]
}
}
# Embedding model selection
EMBEDDING_MODELS = {
"openai/text-embedding-3-small": {
"dimensions": 1536,
"cost": "$0.02/1M tokens",
"quality": "Good for most use cases"
},
"openai/text-embedding-3-large": {
"dimensions": 3072,
"cost": "$0.13/1M tokens",
"quality": "Best for complex queries"
},
"local/bge-large": {
"dimensions": 1024,
"cost": "Free (compute only)",
"quality": "Comparable to OpenAI small"
}
}
1.3 Retrieval Strategies
# Basic semantic search
def semantic_search(query: str, top_k: int = 5):
query_embedding = embed(query)
results = vector_db.similarity_search(
query_embedding,
top_k=top_k
)
return results
# Hybrid search (semantic + keyword)
def hybrid_search(query: str, top_k: int = 5, alpha: float = 0.5):
"""
alpha=1.0: Pure semantic
alpha=0.0: Pure keyword (BM25)
alpha=0.5: Balanced
"""
semantic_results = vector_db.similarity_search(query)
keyword_results = bm25_search(query)
# Reciprocal Rank Fusion
return rrf_merge(semantic_results, keyword_results, alpha)
# Multi-query retrieval
def multi_query_retrieval(query: str):
"""Generate multiple query variations for better recall"""
queries = llm.generate_query_variations(query, n=3)
all_results = []
for q in queries:
all_results.extend(semantic_search(q))
return deduplicate(all_results)
# Contextual compression
def compressed_retrieval(query: str):
"""Retrieve then compress to relevant parts only"""
docs = semantic_search(query, top_k=10)
compressed = llm.extract_relevant_parts(docs, query)
return compressed
1.4 Generation with Context
RAG_PROMPT_TEMPLATE = """
Answer the user's question based ONLY on the following context.
If the context doesn't contain enough information, say "I don't have enough information to answer that."
Context:
{context}
Question: {question}
Answer:"""
def generate_with_rag(question: str):
# Retrieve
context_docs = hybrid_search(question, top_k=5)
context = "\n\n".join([doc.content for doc in context_docs])
# Generate
prompt = RAG_PROMPT_TEMPLATE.format(
context=context,
question=question
)
response = llm.generate(prompt)
# Return with citations
return {
"answer": response,
"sources": [doc.metadata for doc in context_docs]
}
2. Agent Architectures
2.1 ReAct Pattern (Reasoning + Acting)
Thought: I need to search for information about X
Action: search("X")
Observation: [search results]
Thought: Based on the results, I should...
Action: calculate(...)
Observation: [calculation result]
Thought: I now have enough information
Action: final_answer("The answer is...")
REACT_PROMPT = """
You are an AI assistant that can use tools to answer questions.
Available tools:
{tools_description}
Use this format:
Thought: [your reasoning about what to do next]
Action: [tool_name(arguments)]
Observation: [tool result - this will be filled in]
... (repeat Thought/Action/Observation as needed)
Thought: I have enough information to answer
Final Answer: [your final response]
Question: {question}
"""
class ReActAgent:
def __init__(self, tools: list, llm):
self.tools = {t.name: t for t in tools}
self.llm = llm
self.max_iterations = 10
def run(self, question: str) -> str:
prompt = REACT_PROMPT.format(
tools_description=self._format_tools(),
question=question
)
for _ in range(self.max_iterations):
response = self.llm.generate(prompt)
if "Final Answer:" in response:
return self._extract_final_answer(response)
action = self._parse_action(response)
observation = self._execute_tool(action)
prompt += f"\nObservation: {observation}\n"
return "Max iterations reached"
2.2 Function Calling Pattern
# Define tools as functions with schemas
TOOLS = [
{
"name": "search_web",
"description": "Search the web for current information",
"parameters": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"query": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Search query"
}
},
"required": ["query"]
}
},
{
"name": "calculate",
"description": "Perform mathematical calculations",
"parameters": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"expression": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Math expression to evaluate"
}
},
"required": ["expression"]
}
}
]
class FunctionCallingAgent:
def run(self, question: str) -> str:
messages = [{"role": "user", "content": question}]
while True:
response = self.llm.chat(
messages=messages,
tools=TOOLS,
tool_choice="auto"
)
if response.tool_calls:
for tool_call in response.tool_calls:
result = self._execute_tool(
tool_call.name,
tool_call.arguments
)
messages.append({
"role": "tool",
"tool_call_id": tool_call.id,
"content": str(result)
})
else:
return response.content
2.3 Plan-and-Execute Pattern
class PlanAndExecuteAgent:
"""
1. Create a plan (list of steps)
2. Execute each step
3. Replan if needed
"""
def run(self, task: str) -> str:
# Planning phase
plan = self.planner.create_plan(task)
# Returns: ["Step 1: ...", "Step 2: ...", ...]
results = []
for step in plan:
# Execute each step
result = self.executor.execute(step, context=results)
results.append(result)
# Check if replan needed
if self._needs_replan(task, results):
new_plan = self.planner.replan(
task,
completed=results,
remaining=plan[len(results):]
)
plan = new_plan
# Synthesize final answer
return self.synthesizer.summarize(task, results)
2.4 Multi-Agent Collaboration
class AgentTeam:
"""
Specialized agents collaborating on complex tasks
"""
def __init__(self):
self.agents = {
"researcher": ResearchAgent(),
"analyst": AnalystAgent(),
"writer": WriterAgent(),
"critic": CriticAgent()
}
self.coordinator = CoordinatorAgent()
def solve(self, task: str) -> str:
# Coordinator assigns subtasks
assignments = self.coordinator.decompose(task)
results = {}
for assignment in assignments:
agent = self.agents[assignment.agent]
result = agent.execute(
assignment.subtask,
context=results
)
results[assignment.id] = result
# Critic reviews
critique = self.agents["critic"].review(results)
if critique.needs_revision:
# Iterate with feedback
return self.solve_with_feedback(task, results, critique)
return self.coordinator.synthesize(results)
3. Prompt IDE Patterns
3.1 Prompt Templates with Variables
class PromptTemplate:
def __init__(self, template: str, variables: list[str]):
self.template = template
self.variables = variables
def format(self, **kwargs) -> str:
# Validate all variables provided
missing = set(self.variables) - set(kwargs.keys())
if missing:
raise ValueError(f"Missing variables: {missing}")
return self.template.format(**kwargs)
def with_examples(self, examples: list[dict]) -> str:
"""Add few-shot examples"""
example_text = "\n\n".join([
f"Input: {ex['input']}\nOutput: {ex['output']}"
for ex in examples
])
return f"{example_text}\n\n{self.template}"
# Usage
summarizer = PromptTemplate(
template="Summarize the following text in {style} style:\n\n{text}",
variables=["style", "text"]
)
prompt = summarizer.format(
style="professional",
text="Long article content..."
)
3.2 Prompt Versioning & A/B Testing
class PromptRegistry:
def __init__(self, db):
self.db = db
def register(self, name: str, template: str, version: str):
"""Store prompt with version"""
self.db.save({
"name": name,
"template": template,
"version": version,
"created_at": datetime.now(),
"metrics": {}
})
def get(self, name: str, version: str = "latest") -> str:
"""Retrieve specific version"""
return self.db.get(name, version)
def ab_test(self, name: str, user_id: str) -> str:
"""Return variant based on user bucket"""
variants = self.db.get_all_versions(name)
bucket = hash(user_id) % len(variants)
return variants[bucket]
def record_outcome(self, prompt_id: str, outcome: dict):
"""Track prompt performance"""
self.db.update_metrics(prompt_id, outcome)
3.3 Prompt Chaining
class PromptChain:
"""
Chain prompts together, passing output as input to next
"""
def __init__(self, steps: list[dict]):
self.steps = steps
def run(self, initial_input: str) -> dict:
context = {"input": initial_input}
results = []
for step in self.steps:
prompt = step["prompt"].format(**context)
output = llm.generate(prompt)
# Parse output if needed
if step.get("parser"):
output = step["parser"](output)
context[step["output_key"]] = output
results.append({
"step": step["name"],
"output": output
})
return {
"final_output": context[self.steps[-1]["output_key"]],
"intermediate_results": results
}
# Example: Research โ Analyze โ Summarize
chain = PromptChain([
{
"name": "research",
"prompt": "Research the topic: {input}",
"output_key": "research"
},
{
"name": "analyze",
"prompt": "Analyze these findings:\n{research}",
"output_key": "analysis"
},
{
"name": "summarize",
"prompt": "Summarize this analysis in 3 bullet points:\n{analysis}",
"output_key": "summary"
}
])
4. LLMOps & Observability
4.1 Metrics to Track
LLM_METRICS = {
# Performance
"latency_p50": "50th percentile response time",
"latency_p99": "99th percentile response time",
"tokens_per_second": "Generation speed",
# Quality
"user_satisfaction": "Thumbs up/down ratio",
"task_completion": "% tasks completed successfully",
"hallucination_rate": "% responses with factual errors",
# Cost
"cost_per_request": "Average $ per API call",
"tokens_per_request": "Average tokens used",
"cache_hit_rate": "% requests served from cache",
# Reliability
"error_rate": "% failed requests",
"timeout_rate": "% requests that timed out",
"retry_rate": "% requests needing retry"
}
4.2 Logging & Tracing
import logging
from opentelemetry import trace
tracer = trace.get_tracer(__name__)
class LLMLogger:
def log_request(self, request_id: str, data: dict):
"""Log LLM request for debugging and analysis"""
log_entry = {
"request_id": request_id,
"timestamp": datetime.now().isoformat(),
"model": data["model"],
"prompt": data["prompt"][:500], # Truncate for storage
"prompt_tokens": data["prompt_tokens"],
"temperature": data.get("temperature", 1.0),
"user_id": data.get("user_id"),
}
logging.info(f"LLM_REQUEST: {json.dumps(log_entry)}")
def log_response(self, request_id: str, data: dict):
"""Log LLM response"""
log_entry = {
"request_id": request_id,
"completion_tokens": data["completion_tokens"],
"total_tokens": data["total_tokens"],
"latency_ms": data["latency_ms"],
"finish_reason": data["finish_reason"],
"cost_usd": self._calculate_cost(data),
}
logging.info(f"LLM_RESPONSE: {json.dumps(log_entry)}")
# Distributed tracing
@tracer.start_as_current_span("llm_call")
def call_llm(prompt: str) -> str:
span = trace.get_current_span()
span.set_attribute("prompt.length", len(prompt))
response = llm.generate(prompt)
span.set_attribute("response.length", len(response))
span.set_attribute("tokens.total", response.usage.total_tokens)
return response.content
4.3 Evaluation Framework
class LLMEvaluator:
"""
Evaluate LLM outputs for quality
"""
def evaluate_response(self,
question: str,
response: str,
ground_truth: str = None) -> dict:
scores = {}
# Relevance: Does it answer the question?
scores["relevance"] = self._score_relevance(question, response)
# Coherence: Is it well-structured?
scores["coherence"] = self._score_coherence(response)
# Groundedness: Is it based on provided context?
scores["groundedness"] = self._score_groundedness(response)
# Accuracy: Does it match ground truth?
if ground_truth:
scores["accuracy"] = self._score_accuracy(response, ground_truth)
# Harmfulness: Is it safe?
scores["safety"] = self._score_safety(response)
return scores
def run_benchmark(self, test_cases: list[dict]) -> dict:
"""Run evaluation on test set"""
results = []
for case in test_cases:
response = llm.generate(case["prompt"])
scores = self.evaluate_response(
question=case["prompt"],
response=response,
ground_truth=case.get("expected")
)
results.append(scores)
return self._aggregate_scores(results)
5. Production Patterns
5.1 Caching Strategy
import hashlib
from functools import lru_cache
class LLMCache:
def __init__(self, redis_client, ttl_seconds=3600):
self.redis = redis_client
self.ttl = ttl_seconds
def _cache_key(self, prompt: str, model: str, **kwargs) -> str:
"""Generate deterministic cache key"""
content = f"{model}:{prompt}:{json.dumps(kwargs, sort_keys=True)}"
return hashlib.sha256(content.encode()).hexdigest()
def get_or_generate(self, prompt: str, model: str, **kwargs) -> str:
key = self._cache_key(prompt, model, **kwargs)
# Check cache
cached = self.redis.get(key)
if cached:
return cached.decode()
# Generate
response = llm.generate(prompt, model=model, **kwargs)
# Cache (only cache deterministic outputs)
if kwargs.get("temperature", 1.0) == 0:
self.redis.setex(key, self.ttl, response)
return response
5.2 Rate Limiting & Retry
import time
from tenacity import retry, wait_exponential, stop_after_attempt
class RateLimiter:
def __init__(self, requests_per_minute: int):
self.rpm = requests_per_minute
self.timestamps = []
def acquire(self):
"""Wait if rate limit would be exceeded"""
now = time.time()
# Remove old timestamps
self.timestamps = [t for t in self.timestamps if now - t < 60]
if len(self.timestamps) >= self.rpm:
sleep_time = 60 - (now - self.timestamps[0])
time.sleep(sleep_time)
self.timestamps.append(time.time())
# Retry with exponential backoff
@retry(
wait=wait_exponential(multiplier=1, min=4, max=60),
stop=stop_after_attempt(5)
)
def call_llm_with_retry(prompt: str) -> str:
try:
return llm.generate(prompt)
except RateLimitError:
raise # Will trigger retry
except APIError as e:
if e.status_code >= 500:
raise # Retry server errors
raise # Don't retry client errors
5.3 Fallback Strategy
class LLMWithFallback:
def __init__(self, primary: str, fallbacks: list[str]):
self.primary = primary
self.fallbacks = fallbacks
def generate(self, prompt: str, **kwargs) -> str:
models = [self.primary] + self.fallbacks
for model in models:
try:
return llm.generate(prompt, model=model, **kwargs)
except (RateLimitError, APIError) as e:
logging.warning(f"Model {model} failed: {e}")
continue
raise AllModelsFailedError("All models exhausted")
# Usage
llm_client = LLMWithFallback(
primary="gpt-4-turbo",
fallbacks=["gpt-3.5-turbo", "claude-3-sonnet"]
)
Architecture Decision Matrix
| Pattern | Use When | Complexity | Cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Simple RAG | FAQ, docs search | Low | Low |
| Hybrid RAG | Mixed queries | Medium | Medium |
| ReAct Agent | Multi-step tasks | Medium | Medium |
| Function Calling | Structured tools | Low | Low |
| Plan-Execute | Complex tasks | High | High |
| Multi-Agent | Research tasks | Very High | Very High |
Resources
Frequently asked questions about LLM Application Patterns
Similar skills
WinMD API Search
Easily find and explore Windows desktop APIs.
WebMCPify
Transform any web app into an agent-ready platform.
Phoenix Tracing
Instrument LLM applications with OpenInference tracing.
Foundry Hosted Agent CopilotKit
Guidance for developing agentic web apps on Azure.
Power Automate Foundation
Connect AI agents to Power Automate seamlessly.
Power Automate Flow Builder
Efficiently build and deploy Power Automate flows programmatically.
