
Pinecone RAG
OfficialFreeBuild RAG pipelines with Pinecone as your vector database.
Free · Opens the source repo
What Pinecone RAG does
The Pinecone RAG skill provides a comprehensive workflow for developers and designers looking to implement retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems or persistent agent memory using Pinecone as the backend vector database. This skill is particularly useful for those who want to index documents for semantic search or maintain context across multiple sessions in agent-based applications. The structured approach ensures that users understand the requirements and configurations needed before diving into code, making it suitable for both novice and experienced developers.
The skill begins by prompting the user to clarify their use case, whether it is for document retrieval or agent memory. This distinction is crucial as it influences the index configuration and retrieval strategies. Users are guided through selecting the appropriate index type—either serverless or pod-based—ensuring optimal performance based on their production needs. The skill emphasizes the importance of batching document upserts and maintaining metadata for efficient retrieval, which is a common pitfall in similar implementations.
Once the indexing is set up, the skill provides detailed instructions on embedding documents, choosing retrieval strategies, and executing full RAG pipelines. Users can implement dense semantic searches or hybrid searches depending on the specificity of their data. The documentation also covers the nuances of using namespaces for isolating agent memories, which is essential for multi-tenant applications. This level of detail helps prevent common mistakes and ensures that the implementation is robust and scalable.
Overall, the Pinecone RAG skill is designed for developers and designers who are looking to leverage Pinecone's capabilities for advanced search and memory functionalities. It provides a clear, step-by-step process that reduces complexity and enhances productivity in building AI-driven applications.
When to use it
Use this skill when you need to implement semantic search or maintain context across sessions in applications that utilize Pinecone as a vector database.
When not to use it
Avoid this skill if your dataset can be managed locally with tools like FAISS or Chroma, or if you require a different vector database solution like pgvector or Weaviate.
What you can build with it
Document Retrieval
Use Pinecone RAG to index a large corpus of documents and retrieve relevant chunks for LLM responses.
Persistent Agent Memory
Implement a system where agents can remember facts and context across sessions using Pinecone.
Hybrid Search Implementation
Combine semantic and keyword search capabilities for domains with specific terminology, enhancing retrieval accuracy.
How to install Pinecone RAG
View source1. Install with the skills CLI
npx skills add github/awesome-copilot/pinecone-rag --agent claude-code2. Or install it manually
Download the skill folder and drop it into ~/.claude/skills/ for all projects, or .claude/skills/ to scope it to one repo. Restart Claude Code so it picks up the new skill.
Anthropic's agentic coding CLI, and the reference implementation of Agent Skills. Drop a skill folder into ~/.claude/skills and Claude Code loads it automatically whenever a task matches the skill's description. Claude Code docs
Inside SKILL.md
Written by githubPinecone RAG Skill
This skill guides you through building a production RAG pipeline or persistent agent memory system using Pinecone. Follow the workflow from start to finish — don't skip steps or jump to code before understanding what the user actually needs.
Before you start — ask one question
Before writing any code, identify which of these two use cases applies:
A — RAG over documents: User wants to index a corpus (PDFs, docs, code, web pages) and retrieve relevant chunks to ground LLM responses.
B — Agent memory: User wants an agent to remember facts, decisions, or context across sessions or across multiple agents sharing a knowledge base.
The setup is similar but the namespace strategy and retrieval patterns differ. If the user hasn't said, ask: "Is this for document retrieval, agent memory, or both?" Then follow the relevant workflow below.
Step 1 — Choose your index configuration
Pick the index type before writing any code. Getting this wrong means re-creating the index later.
Serverless (recommended for most cases)
from pinecone import Pinecone, ServerlessSpec
pc = Pinecone(api_key="PINECONE_API_KEY")
if "my-index" not in pc.list_indexes().names():
pc.create_index(
name="my-index",
dimension=1536, # must match your embedding model exactly
metric="cosine",
spec=ServerlessSpec(cloud="aws", region="us-east-1")
)
index = pc.Index("my-index")
Pod-based (for consistent high-throughput production)
from pinecone import PodSpec
pc.create_index(
name="my-index-prod",
dimension=1536,
metric="cosine",
spec=PodSpec(environment="us-east1-gcp", pod_type="p1.x1")
)
Dimension quick reference — match this exactly to your embedding model:
| Model | Dimension |
|---|---|
text-embedding-3-small | 1536 |
text-embedding-3-large | 3072 |
voyage-3 / voyage-multimodal-3 | 1024 |
BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5 | 1024 |
intfloat/multilingual-e5-large (Arabic, Malay, Chinese) | 1024 |
Checkpoint: Index exists, dimension matches embedding model,
index.describe_index_stats()returns without error.
Step 2 — Embed and upsert documents
Always batch upserts — never upsert one vector at a time.
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI()
def embed(texts: list[str]) -> list[list[float]]:
res = client.embeddings.create(model="text-embedding-3-small", input=texts)
return [r.embedding for r in res.data]
def upsert_docs(index, docs: list[dict], namespace: str = "default"):
"""docs = [{"id": "...", "text": "...", "metadata": {...}}]"""
BATCH = 100
for i in range(0, len(docs), BATCH):
batch = docs[i:i + BATCH]
vecs = [
{
"id": d["id"],
"values": emb,
"metadata": {**d.get("metadata", {}), "text": d["text"]}
}
for d, emb in zip(batch, embed([d["text"] for d in batch]))
]
index.upsert(vectors=vecs, namespace=namespace)
Always store the original text in metadata — this avoids a second lookup at retrieval time.
Checkpoint:
index.describe_index_stats()shows vector count > 0 in the target namespace.
Step 3 — Choose retrieval strategy
Dense (semantic) search — use for most cases
def search(index, query: str, top_k: int = 5, namespace: str = "default",
filter: dict = None) -> list[dict]:
[q_emb] = embed([query])
results = index.query(
vector=q_emb, top_k=top_k, namespace=namespace,
include_metadata=True, filter=filter
)
return [{"text": m.metadata["text"], "score": m.score, "id": m.id}
for m in results.matches]
Hybrid search (semantic + BM25 keyword) — use when corpus has exact terminology
Use hybrid when the domain has precise terms that semantic search misses: legal citations, medical codes, product SKUs, API method names.
from pinecone_text.sparse import BM25Encoder
bm25 = BM25Encoder().default()
bm25.fit([d["text"] for d in docs]) # fit once on your corpus
def hybrid_search(index, query: str, top_k: int = 5, alpha: float = 0.7):
"""alpha=1.0 is pure dense; alpha=0.0 is pure sparse."""
dense = [v * alpha for v in embed([query])[0]]
sparse_raw = bm25.encode_queries(query)
sparse = {
"indices": sparse_raw["indices"],
"values": [v * (1 - alpha) for v in sparse_raw["values"]]
}
return index.query(vector=dense, sparse_vector=sparse,
top_k=top_k, include_metadata=True).matches
Metadata filtering — use to scope results before semantic ranking
# Exact match
results = index.query(vector=emb, filter={"source": {"$eq": "confluence"}})
# Combined filter
results = index.query(vector=emb, filter={
"$and": [
{"category": {"$eq": "engineering"}},
{"language": {"$in": ["en", "ar"]}}
]
})
Checkpoint: A test query returns relevant results with scores > 0.7 for clearly matching content.
Step 4A — Full RAG pipeline (document use case)
def rag_answer(index, question: str, namespace: str = "default",
model: str = "gpt-4o-mini") -> str:
hits = search(index, question, top_k=5, namespace=namespace)
context = "\n\n".join(h["text"] for h in hits)
return client.chat.completions.create(
model=model,
messages=[
{
"role": "system",
"content": (
"Answer using only the provided context. "
"If the answer isn't in the context, say so.\n\n"
f"Context:\n{context}"
)
},
{"role": "user", "content": question}
]
).choices[0].message.content
Step 4B — Agent memory (memory use case)
Use namespaces to isolate each agent's or user's memories completely. Namespace per agent prevents memory bleed across users or sessions.
import time, hashlib
def remember(index, agent_id: str, content: str,
memory_type: str = "fact"):
"""Store a memory for an agent."""
mem_id = hashlib.md5(
f"{agent_id}{content}{time.time()}".encode()
).hexdigest()
[emb] = embed([content])
index.upsert(
vectors=[{
"id": mem_id,
"values": emb,
"metadata": {
"text": content,
"type": memory_type,
"timestamp": time.time(),
"agent_id": agent_id
}
}],
namespace=f"agent_{agent_id}"
)
def recall(index, agent_id: str, query: str,
top_k: int = 5) -> list[str]:
"""Recall relevant memories for an agent."""
return [h["text"] for h in
search(index, query, top_k=top_k,
namespace=f"agent_{agent_id}")]
def forget(index, agent_id: str):
"""Wipe all memories for an agent (e.g., on user request)."""
index.delete(delete_all=True, namespace=f"agent_{agent_id}")
Step 5 — Wire it together and test end to end
Run a quick smoke test before integrating into the larger system:
# Smoke test
upsert_docs(index, [
{"id": "t1", "text": "Pinecone is a vector database for semantic search."},
{"id": "t2", "text": "RAG combines retrieval with language model generation."},
])
hits = search(index, "What is Pinecone?")
assert hits[0]["score"] > 0.7, f"Expected high similarity, got {hits[0]['score']}"
print("Smoke test passed:", hits[0]["text"])
Checkpoint: Smoke test passes. End-to-end: index → upsert → query → LLM response works without errors.
Common pitfalls — fix these before they become bugs
- Dimension mismatch: always verify
len(embed(["test"])[0])matches the index dimension before your first upsert. - Missing text in metadata: if you don't store
"text"in metadata, you'll need a second lookup to get the actual content at query time. - Single-vector upserts in a loop: always batch in chunks of 100.
- No namespace strategy: decide upfront — one namespace per user/agent prevents cross-tenant data leaks that are hard to fix later.
- Fitting BM25 on a small corpus: BM25 needs a representative corpus to build good term frequencies. Fit on at least a few hundred documents.
When NOT to use this skill
Use a different approach when:
- The dataset fits in memory and latency doesn't matter → use FAISS or Chroma
- You're already on PostgreSQL and want to avoid a new service → use pgvector
- You need sub-5ms p99 latency with no external API calls → local vector store
- The user explicitly wants a different vector DB (Weaviate, Qdrant, etc.)
Frequently asked questions about Pinecone RAG
Similar skills
Mini Context Graph
Build a persistent knowledge base with structured retrieval.
Amazon Bedrock
Build generative AI applications on AWS Bedrock.
Supermemory
Enhance AI agents with persistent memory and context.
RAG Implementation
Build knowledge-grounded AI systems with RAG.
Memory Management
Enhance learning and knowledge sharing with persistent memory.
Clarity Gate
Ensure documents meet epistemic quality before ingestion.
