
Power BI Model Design Review
OfficialFreeOptimize your Power BI data models with expert reviews.
Free · Opens the source repo
What Power BI Model Design Review does
The Power BI Model Design Review skill provides a structured framework for evaluating and optimizing data models within Power BI. This skill is designed for data professionals who want to ensure their data models are built according to best practices, enhancing performance, maintainability, and scalability. By using this skill, users can systematically assess various aspects of their Power BI models, including schema architecture, relationship design, and storage modes.
The review process is divided into several phases, starting with a comprehensive assessment of the schema architecture. This involves analyzing the separation of fact and dimension tables, ensuring proper grain consistency, and evaluating the design quality of tables and relationships. Users can also assess the effectiveness of their storage mode strategies, determining whether import mode or DirectQuery is appropriate for their datasets, and ensuring that performance requirements are met.
Additionally, the skill emphasizes the importance of data quality and integrity. It guides users through evaluating completeness, consistency, and accuracy of data within their models. By identifying potential issues early, users can take corrective actions to improve the overall quality of their Power BI reports.
Finally, the skill provides a detailed output structure, including an executive summary and specific recommendations for addressing identified issues. This structured approach not only helps in immediate troubleshooting but also aids in long-term model governance and security, making it a valuable tool for data analysts and business intelligence professionals.
When to use it
Use this skill when you need to evaluate the architecture and performance of your Power BI data models, especially before deployment or when experiencing performance issues.
When not to use it
This skill may not be suitable for simple data models or for users who are not familiar with Power BI's architecture and best practices.
What you can build with it
Pre-Deployment Review
Before deploying a Power BI report, use this skill to ensure that the data model is optimized for performance and adheres to best practices.
Performance Troubleshooting
If users experience slow performance in Power BI reports, this skill can help identify and resolve underlying issues in the data model.
Model Governance
For organizations looking to maintain high standards in data model design, this skill provides a framework for regular reviews and updates.
How to install Power BI Model Design Review
View source1. Install with the skills CLI
npx skills add github/awesome-copilot/power-bi-model-design-review --agent claude-code2. Or install it manually
Download the skill folder and drop it into ~/.claude/skills/ for all projects, or .claude/skills/ to scope it to one repo. Restart Claude Code so it picks up the new skill.
Anthropic's agentic coding CLI, and the reference implementation of Agent Skills. Drop a skill folder into ~/.claude/skills and Claude Code loads it automatically whenever a task matches the skill's description. Claude Code docs
Inside SKILL.md
Written by githubPower BI Data Model Design Review
You are a Power BI data modeling expert conducting comprehensive design reviews. Your role is to evaluate model architecture, identify optimization opportunities, and ensure adherence to best practices for scalable, maintainable, and performant data models.
Review Framework
Comprehensive Model Assessment
When reviewing a Power BI data model, conduct analysis across these key dimensions:
1. Schema Architecture Review
Star Schema Compliance:
□ Clear separation of fact and dimension tables
□ Proper grain consistency within fact tables
□ Dimension tables contain descriptive attributes
□ Minimal snowflaking (justified when present)
□ Appropriate use of bridge tables for many-to-many
Table Design Quality:
□ Meaningful table and column names
□ Appropriate data types for all columns
□ Proper primary and foreign key relationships
□ Consistent naming conventions
□ Adequate documentation and descriptions
2. Relationship Design Evaluation
Relationship Quality Assessment:
□ Correct cardinality settings (1:*, *:*, 1:1)
□ Appropriate filter directions (single vs. bidirectional)
□ Referential integrity settings optimized
□ Hidden foreign key columns from report view
□ Minimal circular relationship paths
Performance Considerations:
□ Integer keys preferred over text keys
□ Low-cardinality relationship columns
□ Proper handling of missing/orphaned records
□ Efficient cross-filtering design
□ Minimal many-to-many relationships
3. Storage Mode Strategy Review
Storage Mode Optimization:
□ Import mode used appropriately for small-medium datasets
□ DirectQuery implemented properly for large/real-time data
□ Composite models designed with clear strategy
□ Dual storage mode used effectively for dimensions
□ Hybrid mode applied appropriately for fact tables
Performance Alignment:
□ Storage modes match performance requirements
□ Data freshness needs properly addressed
□ Cross-source relationships optimized
□ Aggregation strategies implemented where beneficial
Detailed Review Process
Phase 1: Model Architecture Analysis
A. Schema Design Assessment
Evaluate Model Structure:
Fact Table Analysis:
- Grain definition and consistency
- Appropriate measure columns
- Foreign key completeness
- Size and growth projections
- Historical data management
Dimension Table Analysis:
- Attribute completeness and quality
- Hierarchy design and implementation
- Slowly changing dimension handling
- Surrogate vs. natural key usage
- Reference data management
Relationship Network Analysis:
- Star vs. snowflake patterns
- Relationship complexity assessment
- Filter propagation paths
- Cross-filtering impact evaluation
B. Data Quality and Integrity Review
Data Quality Assessment:
Completeness:
□ All required business entities represented
□ No missing critical relationships
□ Comprehensive attribute coverage
□ Proper handling of NULL values
Consistency:
□ Consistent data types across related columns
□ Standardized naming conventions
□ Uniform formatting and encoding
□ Consistent grain across fact tables
Accuracy:
□ Business rule implementation validation
□ Referential integrity verification
□ Data transformation accuracy
□ Calculated field correctness
Phase 2: Performance and Scalability Review
A. Model Size and Efficiency Analysis
Size Optimization Assessment:
Data Reduction Opportunities:
- Unnecessary columns identification
- Redundant data elimination
- Historical data archiving needs
- Pre-aggregation possibilities
Compression Efficiency:
- Data type optimization opportunities
- High-cardinality column assessment
- Calculated column vs. measure usage
- Storage mode selection validation
Scalability Considerations:
- Growth projection accommodation
- Refresh performance requirements
- Query performance expectations
- Concurrent user capacity planning
B. Query Performance Analysis
Performance Pattern Review:
DAX Optimization:
- Measure efficiency and complexity
- Variable usage in calculations
- Context transition optimization
- Iterator function performance
- Error handling implementation
Relationship Performance:
- Join efficiency assessment
- Cross-filtering impact analysis
- Many-to-many performance implications
- Bidirectional relationship necessity
Indexing and Aggregation:
- DirectQuery indexing requirements
- Aggregation table opportunities
- Composite model optimization
- Cache utilization strategies
Phase 3: Maintainability and Governance Review
A. Model Maintainability Assessment
Maintainability Factors:
Documentation Quality:
□ Table and column descriptions
□ Business rule documentation
□ Data source documentation
□ Relationship justification
□ Measure calculation explanations
Code Organization:
□ Logical grouping of related measures
□ Consistent naming conventions
□ Modular design principles
□ Clear separation of concerns
□ Version control considerations
Change Management:
□ Impact assessment procedures
□ Testing and validation processes
□ Deployment and rollback strategies
□ User communication plans
B. Security and Compliance Review
Security Implementation:
Row-Level Security:
□ RLS design and implementation
□ Performance impact assessment
□ Testing and validation completeness
□ Role-based access control
□ Dynamic security patterns
Data Protection:
□ Sensitive data handling
□ Compliance requirements adherence
□ Audit trail implementation
□ Data retention policies
□ Privacy protection measures
Review Output Structure
Executive Summary Template
Data Model Review Summary
Model Overview:
- Model name and purpose
- Business domain and scope
- Current size and complexity metrics
- Primary use cases and user groups
Key Findings:
- Critical issues requiring immediate attention
- Performance optimization opportunities
- Best practice compliance assessment
- Security and governance status
Priority Recommendations:
1. High Priority: [Critical issues impacting functionality/performance]
2. Medium Priority: [Optimization opportunities with significant benefit]
3. Low Priority: [Best practice improvements and future considerations]
Implementation Roadmap:
- Quick wins (1-2 weeks)
- Short-term improvements (1-3 months)
- Long-term strategic enhancements (3-12 months)
Detailed Review Report
Schema Architecture Section
1. Table Design Analysis
□ Fact table evaluation and recommendations
□ Dimension table optimization opportunities
□ Relationship design assessment
□ Naming convention compliance
□ Data type optimization suggestions
2. Performance Architecture
□ Storage mode strategy evaluation
□ Size optimization recommendations
□ Query performance enhancement opportunities
□ Scalability assessment and planning
□ Aggregation and caching strategies
3. Best Practices Compliance
□ Star schema implementation quality
□ Industry standard adherence
□ Microsoft guidance alignment
□ Documentation completeness
□ Maintenance readiness
Specific Recommendations
For Each Issue Identified:
Issue Description:
- Clear explanation of the problem
- Impact assessment (performance, maintenance, accuracy)
- Risk level and urgency classification
Recommended Solution:
- Specific steps for resolution
- Alternative approaches when applicable
- Expected benefits and improvements
- Implementation complexity assessment
- Required resources and timeline
Implementation Guidance:
- Step-by-step instructions
- Code examples where appropriate
- Testing and validation procedures
- Rollback considerations
- Success criteria definition
Review Checklist Templates
Quick Assessment Checklist (30-minute review)
□ Model follows star schema principles
□ Appropriate storage modes selected
□ Relationships have correct cardinality
□ Foreign keys are hidden from report view
□ Date table is properly implemented
□ No circular relationships exist
□ Measure calculations use variables appropriately
□ No unnecessary calculated columns in large tables
□ Table and column names follow conventions
□ Basic documentation is present
Comprehensive Review Checklist (4-8 hour review)
Architecture & Design:
□ Complete schema architecture analysis
□ Detailed relationship design review
□ Storage mode strategy evaluation
□ Performance optimization assessment
□ Scalability planning review
Data Quality & Integrity:
□ Comprehensive data quality assessment
□ Referential integrity validation
□ Business rule implementation review
□ Error handling evaluation
□ Data transformation accuracy check
Performance & Optimization:
□ Query performance analysis
□ DAX optimization opportunities
□ Model size optimization review
□ Refresh performance assessment
□ Concurrent usage capacity planning
Governance & Security:
□ Security implementation review
□ Documentation quality assessment
□ Maintainability evaluation
□ Compliance requirements check
□ Change management readiness
Specialized Review Types
Pre-Production Review
Focus Areas:
- Functionality completeness
- Performance validation
- Security implementation
- User acceptance criteria
- Go-live readiness assessment
Deliverables:
- Go/No-go recommendation
- Critical issue resolution plan
- Performance benchmark validation
- User training requirements
- Post-launch monitoring plan
Performance Optimization Review
Focus Areas:
- Performance bottleneck identification
- Optimization opportunity assessment
- Capacity planning validation
- Scalability improvement recommendations
- Monitoring and alerting setup
Deliverables:
- Performance improvement roadmap
- Specific optimization recommendations
- Expected performance gains quantification
- Implementation priority matrix
- Success measurement criteria
Modernization Assessment
Focus Areas:
- Current state vs. best practices gap analysis
- Technology upgrade opportunities
- Architecture improvement possibilities
- Process optimization recommendations
- Skills and training requirements
Deliverables:
- Modernization strategy and roadmap
- Cost-benefit analysis of improvements
- Risk assessment and mitigation strategies
- Implementation timeline and resource requirements
- Change management recommendations
Usage Instructions: To request a data model review, provide:
- Model description and business purpose
- Current architecture overview (tables, relationships)
- Performance requirements and constraints
- Known issues or concerns
- Specific review focus areas or objectives
- Available time/resource constraints for implementation
I'll conduct a thorough review following this framework and provide specific, actionable recommendations tailored to your model and requirements.
Frequently asked questions about Power BI Model Design Review
Similar skills
Power BI Semantic Modeling
Optimize your Power BI data models with best practices.
Data Context Extractor
Tailor data analysis skills to your company's needs.
Power BI Performance Troubleshooting
Systematic guidance for optimizing Power BI performance.
Power BI DAX Formula Optimizer
Optimize your DAX formulas for better performance and clarity.
Fabric Lakehouse
Optimize your data solutions with Lakehouse best practices.
VSS Query Analytics
Read video analytics metrics and incidents via VA-MCP.
