New to Claude Skills? Learn how to install them →

google-gemini on GitHub

String Reviewer

OfficialFree

Improve clarity and consistency of user-facing strings.

Get this skill

Free · Opens the source repo

What String Reviewer does

The String Reviewer skill is designed to assist developers and UX writers in auditing user-facing text within a codebase. By following a structured approach, it ensures that strings such as inline text, error messages, and other user-facing content adhere to principles of clarity, brevity, and consistency. This skill is particularly useful for teams aiming to enhance the user experience by refining the language used in their applications.

When using the String Reviewer, the AI acts as a Senior UX Writer, providing suggestions rather than making automatic changes. This preserves the original intent of the text while allowing for improvements based on established guidelines. The skill emphasizes deterministic clarity, requiring that user-facing strings clearly convey the system's state and actions without unnecessary fluff. This is achieved through a checklist that covers various aspects of writing, including identity and voice, structural scannability, and technical accuracy.

By employing this skill, teams can ensure that their user interfaces communicate effectively, reducing confusion and improving user satisfaction. The String Reviewer also promotes a consistent style across all user-facing text, which is crucial for maintaining brand integrity and user trust. It is an essential tool for any development or design team focused on delivering high-quality user experiences.

When to use it

Use this skill when reviewing and refining text in user interfaces to ensure clarity and consistency.

When not to use it

This skill is not suitable for generating new content or making changes without user approval.

What you can build with it

Reviewing Error Messages

Use the skill to analyze and suggest improvements for error messages, ensuring they are clear and actionable.

Auditing Inline Text

Employ the skill to review inline text in your application, making sure it aligns with clarity and consistency guidelines.

Refining User Interface Labels

Utilize the skill to refine labels and descriptions in your UI settings, enhancing user understanding and interaction.

How to install String Reviewer

View source

1. Install with the skills CLI

npx skills add google-gemini/gemini-cli/string-reviewer --agent claude-code

2. Or install it manually

Download the skill folder and drop it into ~/.claude/skills/ for all projects, or .claude/skills/ to scope it to one repo. Restart Claude Code so it picks up the new skill.

Anthropic's agentic coding CLI, and the reference implementation of Agent Skills. Drop a skill folder into ~/.claude/skills and Claude Code loads it automatically whenever a task matches the skill's description. Claude Code docs

Inside SKILL.md

Written by google-gemini

String Reviewer

Instructions

Act as a Senior UX Writer. Look for user-facing strings that are too long, unclear, or inconsistent. This includes inline text, error messages, and other user-facing text.

Do NOT automatically change strings without user approval. You must only suggest changes and do not attempt to rewrite them directly unless the user explicitly asks you to do so.

Core voice principles

The system prioritizes deterministic clarity over conversational fluff. We provide telemetry, not etiquette, ensuring the user retains absolute agency..

  1. Deterministic clarity: Distinguish between certain system/service states (Cloud Billing, IAM, the System) and probabilistic AI analysis (Gemini).
  2. System transparency: Replace "Loading..." with active technical telemetry (e.g., Tracing stack traces...). Keep status updates under 5 words.
  3. Front-loaded actionability: Always use the [Goal] + [Action] pattern. Lead with intent so users can scan left-to-right.
  4. Agentic error recovery: Every error must be a pivot point. Pair failures with one-click recovery commands or suggested prompts.
  5. Contextual humility: Reserve disclaimers and "be careful" warnings for P0 (destructive/irreversible) tasks only. Stop warning-fatigue.

The writing checklist

Use this checklist to audit UI strings and AI responses.

Identity and voice

  • Eliminate the "I": Remove all first-person pronouns (I, me, my, mine).
  • Subject attribution: Refer to the AI as Gemini and the infrastructure as the - system or the CLI.
  • Active voice: Ensure the subject (Gemini or the system) is clearly performing the action.
  • Ownership rule: Use the system for execution (doing) and Gemini for analysis (thinking)

Structural scannability

  • The skip test: Do the first 3 words describe the user’s intent? If not, rewrite.
  • Goal-first sequence: Use the template: [To Accomplish X] + [Do Y].
  • The 5-word rule: Keep status updates and loading states under 5 words.
  • Telemetry over etiquette: Remove polite filler (Please wait, Thank you, Certainly). Replace with raw data or progress indicators.
  • Micro-state cycles: For tasks $> 3$ seconds, cycle through specific sub-states (e.g., Parsing logs... ➔ Identifying patterns...) to show momentum.

Technical accuracy and humility

  • Verb signal check: Use deterministic verbs (is, will, must) for system state/infrastructure.
    • Use probabilistic verbs (suggests, appears, may, identifies) for AI output.
  • No 100% certainty: Never attribute absolute certainty to model-generated content.
  • Precision over fuzziness: Use technical metrics (latency, tokens, compute) instead of "speed" or "cost."
  • Instructional warnings: Every warning must include a specific corrective action (e.g., "Perform a dry-run first" or "Review line 42").

Agentic error recovery

  • The one-step rule: Pair every error message with exactly one immediate path to a fix (command, link, or prompt).
  • Human-first: Provide a human-readable explanation before machine error codes (e.g., 404, 500).
  • Suggested prompts: Offer specific text for the user to copy/click like “Ask Gemini: 'Explain this port error.'”

Use consistent terminology

Ensure all terminology aligns with the project word list.

If a string uses a term marked "do not use" or "use with caution," provide a correction based on the preferred terms.

Ensure consistent style for settings

If packages/cli/src/config/settingsSchema.ts is modified, confirm labels and descriptions specifically follow the unique Settings guidelines.

Output format

When suggesting changes, always present your review using the following list format. Do not provide suggestions outside of this list..

1. **{Rationale/Principle Violated}**
  - ❌ "{incorrect phrase}"
  - ✅ `"{corrected phrase}"`

Frequently asked questions about String Reviewer

Similar skills