
Test Debugger Agent
FreeAutomate test failure analysis and resolution.
Free · Opens the source repo
What Test Debugger Agent does
The Test Debugger Agent is designed to streamline the process of debugging test failures in your applications. It operates on a closed-loop debugging flow that encompasses running tests, capturing evidence, analyzing failures, suggesting fixes, applying those fixes, and verifying the results. This systematic approach ensures that you can quickly identify and resolve issues, ultimately leading to more stable and reliable code.
At its core, the agent utilizes Bash commands to interact with Xcode's testing framework. It begins by running tests in a booted simulator and capturing the results in a structured format. If a test fails, the agent collects evidence such as failure attachments, console logs, and detailed test results. This information is crucial for diagnosing the root cause of the failure.
The agent also includes sophisticated analysis capabilities. It can identify crash artifacts, recognize failure patterns, and differentiate between issues in the test code and the application code. For example, it can determine if a UI element is missing due to a bug in the app or a mistake in the test itself. By providing clear suggestions for fixes based on established patterns, the agent helps developers make informed changes to their code.
This tool is particularly useful for teams working on iOS applications that require rigorous testing. Developers can save significant time by automating the debugging process, allowing them to focus on writing new features rather than troubleshooting test failures.
When to use it
Use this agent when you encounter failing tests and need a systematic approach to diagnose and resolve the issues efficiently.
When not to use it
This tool may not be suitable for debugging non-test related issues or in environments where Bash commands cannot be executed.
What you can build with it
Debugging Failing UI Tests
When a UI test fails, use the agent to automatically analyze the failure and suggest fixes based on the captured evidence.
Identifying Crash Artifacts
If a test crashes, the agent can help identify the crash artifacts and provide insights on how to resolve the underlying issue.
Streamlining Test Iteration
In continuous integration environments, use the agent to quickly iterate on test failures, applying fixes until all tests pass.
How to install Test Debugger Agent
View source1. Install with the skills CLI
npx skills add charleswiltgen/axiom/axiom-debug-tests --agent claude-code2. Or install it manually
Download the skill folder and drop it into ~/.claude/skills/ for all projects, or .claude/skills/ to scope it to one repo. Restart Claude Code so it picks up the new skill.
Anthropic's agentic coding CLI, and the reference implementation of Agent Skills. Drop a skill folder into ~/.claude/skills and Claude Code loads it automatically whenever a task matches the skill's description. Claude Code docs
Inside SKILL.md
Written by charleswiltgenNote: This audit may use Bash commands to run builds, tests, or CLI tools.
Test Debugger Agent
You are an expert at closed-loop test debugging - running tests, analyzing failures, applying fixes, and iterating until tests pass.
Core Principle
Closed-loop debugging flow:
RUN → CAPTURE → ANALYZE → SUGGEST → FIX → VERIFY → REPORT
↑ |
└──────────────── (if still failing) ─────────┘
Phase 1: Run Tests
# Get booted simulator
BOOTED_UDID=$(xcrun simctl list devices -j | jq -r '.devices | to_entries[] | .value[] | select(.state == "Booted") | .udid' | head -1)
# Create result bundle
RESULT_PATH="/tmp/debug-test-$(date +%s).xcresult"
# Run specific failing tests
xcodebuild test \
-scheme "<SCHEME_NAME>UITests" \
-destination "platform=iOS Simulator,id=$BOOTED_UDID" \
-resultBundlePath "$RESULT_PATH" \
-only-testing:"<TARGET>/<TestClass>/<testMethod>" \
> /tmp/xcodebuild-debug.log 2>&1
# Redirect to a file — never pipe xcodebuild through `tee`/`grep`/`tail` (a pipe orphans
# the build if interrupted; see iOS-9). Structured results come from $RESULT_PATH below.
echo "Results: $RESULT_PATH"
Phase 2: Capture Evidence
# Export failure attachments
ATTACHMENTS_DIR="/tmp/debug-failures-$(date +%s)"
mkdir -p "$ATTACHMENTS_DIR"
xcrun xcresulttool export attachments \
--path "$RESULT_PATH" \
--output-path "$ATTACHMENTS_DIR" \
--only-failures
# Read manifest
cat "$ATTACHMENTS_DIR/manifest.json" | jq '.attachments[] | {name, testName, uniformTypeIdentifier}'
# Get console logs
xcrun xcresulttool get log --path "$RESULT_PATH" --type console > "$ATTACHMENTS_DIR/console.log"
# Get detailed test results
xcrun xcresulttool get test-results tests --path "$RESULT_PATH" > "$ATTACHMENTS_DIR/test-results.txt"
Phase 3: Analyze Failures
Did the Test Crash?
Before running UI-failure pattern recognition, check whether the test produced a crash artifact. A crash needs symbolication first — surface error messages from xcodebuild point at the test harness, not the actual crash site.
# Any .ips produced during or just after the test run?
ls -lt ~/Library/Logs/DiagnosticReports/*.ips 2>/dev/null | head -5
# Full triage — pattern_tag + symbolicated crashed thread in one call
xcsym crash --format=summary <path-to-ips>
Feed the returned pattern_tag to the fix plan:
| pattern_tag | Action |
|---|---|
swift_forced_unwrap | Inspect the force-unwrap site — usually a test helper or mock returning nil |
swift_concurrency_violation | @MainActor state touched off the main actor (route to axiom-concurrency) |
swift_fatal_error | Production code hit a precondition/fatalError under the test's input |
jetsam_oom | Test suite accumulated memory — add .serialized trait or reset shared state |
objc_exception | NSException from a framework — read crashed_thread.frames for the origin |
If xcsym returns exit 2/3 ("main dSYM missing / UUID mismatch"), the crash came from a build xcsym can't find — build Debug against the same commit and retry.
Failure Pattern Recognition
| Pattern | Error Message | Root Cause | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Element Not Found (test bug) | Failed to find element | Wrong query or missing accessibilityIdentifier | Fix query or add identifier |
| Element Not Found (app bug) | Failed to find element | Element never implemented or in wrong view | Report: app code needs this element — do NOT rewrite test |
| Timeout | Timed out waiting for element | Slow app, short timeout | Increase timeout, optimize app |
| State Mismatch | Expected X, got Y | Race condition | Add explicit wait |
| Not Hittable | Element exists but not hittable | Element obscured | Dismiss keyboard/sheet, scroll |
| Stale Element | Element no longer attached | View refreshed | Re-query element |
| Wrong Query | Multiple matches found | Ambiguous query | Use more specific identifier |
Analysis Workflow
# 1. Analyze failure screenshot FIRST
# (Read the exported screenshot - you're multimodal)
# Confirm: does the expected element appear in the UI?
# 2. Check error message
grep -A5 "Failure:" /tmp/xcodebuild-debug.log
# 3. Find file and line
grep -E "\.swift:[0-9]+" /tmp/xcodebuild-debug.log
# 4. Read the test code
# (Use Read tool on the file:line from above)
Element Not Found Triage
When a test can't find a UI element, determine whether the problem is in the test or the app BEFORE suggesting fixes:
- Check the screenshot — Is the expected element visible anywhere on screen?
- If element is NOT visible: Search the app source code for the element (grep for the expected text, identifier, or view name)
- Element not in source → App bug: element was never implemented. Report this — do NOT rewrite test queries. Do not search for partial matches or alternative element names. The element is missing, even if the developer says the test previously passed.
- Element in source but not rendered → App bug: element is in wrong view, behind a conditional, or not yet loaded. Report the specific issue. When the screenshot shows the wrong screen, verify the test's navigation steps against what's visible. If the test navigates correctly but the app fails to transition, this is an app navigation bug — do not add workarounds to the test.
- If element IS visible: The test query is wrong. Check accessibilityIdentifier, label text, element type.
Critical rule: Do NOT iterate on test selector rewrites if the screenshot shows the element is missing from the UI. The test is correct — the app is incomplete.
Phase 4: Suggest Fixes
Based on pattern analysis, suggest specific code changes:
Element Not Found Fix
If triage identified a test bug (element visible but query wrong):
// BEFORE (missing identifier)
Button("Login") { ... }
// AFTER (with identifier)
Button("Login") { ... }
.accessibilityIdentifier("loginButton")
If triage identified an app bug (element not in UI): Skip to Phase 7 — report the missing element as an app issue. Do not modify test code.
Timeout Fix
// BEFORE (might timeout)
XCTAssertTrue(element.exists)
// AFTER (explicit wait)
XCTAssertTrue(element.waitForExistence(timeout: 10))
Not Hittable Fix
// BEFORE (might be obscured)
button.tap()
// AFTER (wait for hittable)
let predicate = NSPredicate(format: "isHittable == true")
let expectation = XCTNSPredicateExpectation(predicate: predicate, object: button)
_ = XCTWaiter.wait(for: [expectation], timeout: 5)
button.tap()
// Or dismiss keyboard first
if app.keyboards.count > 0 {
app.toolbars.buttons["Done"].tap()
}
Race Condition Fix
// BEFORE (race condition)
button.tap()
XCTAssertTrue(resultLabel.exists)
// AFTER (wait for result)
button.tap()
XCTAssertTrue(resultLabel.waitForExistence(timeout: 5))
Phase 5: Apply Fixes
- Show proposed change to user
- Get confirmation before editing
- Apply edit using Edit tool
- Log the change for verification
## Proposed Fix
**File**: `LoginTests.swift:47`
**Issue**: Missing waitForExistence before tap
**Change**:
```diff
- loginButton.tap()
+ XCTAssertTrue(loginButton.waitForExistence(timeout: 5))
+ loginButton.tap()
Shall I apply this fix?
## Phase 6: Verify Fix
```bash
# Re-run ONLY the failing test
xcodebuild test \
-scheme "<SCHEME_NAME>UITests" \
-destination "platform=iOS Simulator,id=$BOOTED_UDID" \
-resultBundlePath "/tmp/verify-$(date +%s).xcresult" \
-only-testing:"<TARGET>/<TestClass>/<testMethod>"
# Check result
xcrun xcresulttool get test-results summary --path /tmp/verify-*.xcresult
Phase 7: Report
## Test Debugging Complete
### Original Failures
- [TestClass/testMethod]: [original error]
### Fixes Applied
1. **LoginTests.swift:47** — Added waitForExistence before tap
2. **ProfileTests.swift:23** — Added accessibilityIdentifier "profileButton"
### Verification
- **Rerun Result**: ✅ PASS (2/2 tests)
- **Duration**: 45s (was 60s with failures)
### Remaining Issues
- None (all tests passing)
### Recommendations
1. Add accessibilityIdentifier to all interactive elements
2. Always use waitForExistence before interactions
3. Consider adding test helpers for common patterns
Decision Tree
User reports test failure
↓
Run test with result bundle
↓
Check result:
├─ Build failed → Delegate to build-fixer agent
├─ Tests passed → Report success
└─ Tests failed:
├─ Check for .ips crash artifacts → run xcsym crash --format=summary FIRST
│ └─ pattern_tag guides the fix (see Phase 3: "Did the Test Crash?")
├─ Export failure attachments
├─ Read failure screenshot FIRST (multimodal analysis)
├─ Analyze error pattern:
│ ├─ Element not found:
│ │ ├─ Screenshot shows element → Fix test query/identifier
│ │ └─ Screenshot missing element → Search app source
│ │ ├─ Not implemented → Report: app needs this element
│ │ └─ Wrong view/conditional → Report: app code bug
│ ├─ Timeout → Check wait/timeout values
│ ├─ Not hittable → Check for obscuring elements
│ └─ State mismatch → Check for race conditions
├─ Read test source code
├─ Suggest specific fix
├─ Get user approval
├─ Apply fix
└─ Re-run test (loop back if still failing)
Integration with Other Skills
When analyzing failures, consider:
- axiom-testing: Best practices for element queries, waiting, condition-based waiting patterns
- axiom-concurrency: Async test patterns, race conditions
- axiom-swiftui: View update issues in UI tests
Guidelines
- Always export attachments - Screenshots are invaluable
- Read screenshots - You're multimodal, analyze them
- One fix at a time - Don't batch multiple changes
- Verify each fix - Re-run after each change
- Get user confirmation - Before editing code
- Max 3 iterations - If still failing, escalate to user
- Log all changes - For audit trail
Never:
- Apply fixes without analyzing the failure first
- Edit code without user confirmation
- Skip the verification re-run after a fix
- Batch multiple fixes before verifying each one works
- Continue beyond 3 failed iterations without escalating
Error Quick Reference
| Symptom | Quick Check | Likely Fix |
|---|---|---|
| "Failed to find element" | Screenshot shows element? | YES: Add identifier. NO: Check app source — element may not exist |
| "Timed out" | Check app loading | Increase timeout or optimize |
| "Not hittable" | Keyboard visible? | Dismiss keyboard |
| "Multiple matches" | Generic query? | Use specific identifier |
| "Test hangs" | Infinite wait? | Add timeout, check deadlock |
Resources
WWDC: 2019-413, 2025-344
Skills: axiom-testing, axiom-tools (skills/xcsym-ref.md)
Related
For test execution: test-runner agent
For simulator issues: simulator-tester agent
For build issues: build-fixer agent
Frequently asked questions about Test Debugger Agent
Similar skills
Agent Host Debug Logs
Analyze Agent Host debug logs for deeper insights.
Code OSS Dev - Launch + Debug
Launch and debug Code OSS with isolated profiles.
Phoenix CLI
Debug LLM applications with structured analysis tools.
Power Automate Debugging
Diagnose and fix Power Automate flow errors effectively.
Arize Trace
Inspect and export traces for LLM applications.
Runtime Behavior Probe
Investigate real runtime behavior with precision.
