
VPE Review
FreePressure-test engineering plans effectively.
Free · Opens the source repo
What VPE Review does
The VPE Review skill is designed to facilitate a thorough interrogation of engineering plans that impact delivery, hiring, team structure, or production discipline. By employing a throughput-first approach, this skill prompts users to answer six critical questions before committing to any engineering decisions. This ensures that teams can identify bottlenecks and inefficiencies in their processes, ultimately leading to improved performance and better outcomes.
Users can invoke the skill with the command /cs:vpe-review <plan>, which initiates a structured review process. The skill is particularly useful in scenarios such as quarterly delivery commitments, engineering hiring plans, team restructuring, and during periods of increased production incidents or declining sprint velocity. By systematically addressing each of the six VPE questions, teams can pinpoint areas for improvement and make informed decisions based on data-driven insights.
The skill leverages specific Python scripts to analyze delivery throughput, hiring funnels, and team structures. For instance, the delivery_throughput_analyzer.py helps teams dissect cycle times and identify where work is stalled. Similarly, the eng_hiring_funnel_calculator.py provides insights into hiring inefficiencies, while the eng_team_structure_designer.py evaluates whether the current team structure aligns with best practices. This comprehensive analysis allows engineering leaders to make strategic adjustments that enhance overall productivity.
In summary, the VPE Review skill is an essential tool for engineering leaders looking to optimize their operations. By utilizing this skill, teams can ensure that their plans are robust and that they are well-prepared to tackle the challenges of engineering management.
When to use it
Use this skill before making significant engineering commitments, such as hiring or restructuring teams.
When not to use it
This skill may not be suitable for small teams or projects where engineering processes are already well-defined and functioning effectively.
What you can build with it
Quarterly Delivery Commitment
Run the VPE Review before your quarterly planning sessions to ensure all engineering commitments are backed by data.
Engineering Hiring Plan Approval
Utilize the skill to assess the hiring funnel and identify any leaks before approving new engineering hires.
Team Restructuring Decisions
Employ the VPE Review to evaluate the current team structure and determine if changes are necessary for optimal performance.
How to install VPE Review
View source1. Install with the skills CLI
npx skills add alirezarezvani/claude-skills/vpe-review --agent claude-code2. Or install it manually
Download the skill folder and drop it into ~/.claude/skills/ for all projects, or .claude/skills/ to scope it to one repo. Restart Claude Code so it picks up the new skill.
Anthropic's agentic coding CLI, and the reference implementation of Agent Skills. Drop a skill folder into ~/.claude/skills and Claude Code loads it automatically whenever a task matches the skill's description. Claude Code docs
Inside SKILL.md
Written by alirezarezvani/cs:vpe-review — VPE Forcing Questions
Command: /cs:vpe-review <plan>
The throughput-first VPE pressure-tests any plan touching eng operations. Six questions before any delivery commitment, eng hiring expansion, team restructure, or production-discipline change.
When to Run
- Before quarterly delivery commitment (sprint planning, OKR review)
- Before approving an eng hiring plan
- Before restructuring eng teams (splitting/merging squads, adding tribes)
- Before deciding whether to hire a VPE separately from CTO (or merge them)
- When production incidents are increasing
- When sprint velocity is dropping but everyone says "we're working hard"
The Six VPE Questions
1. What's the cycle time, and where does work wait?
No DORA, no diagnosis.
- Lead Time for Changes is the single best health metric
- If you can't decompose cycle time into stages, you can't fix the bottleneck
- Run
delivery_throughput_analyzer.py
2. What's the DORA performance level on all 4 metrics?
One Elite metric and three Lows = bad. Four Highs = healthy.
- Deployment Frequency, Lead Time, MTTR, Change Failure Rate
- The worst metric defines overall level
- Fix lead time first; everything else follows
3. Where is the hiring funnel leaking?
"Can't find good engineers" is wrong.
- Specific stage is over-filtering OR top-of-funnel volume is too low OR offer-to-accept is broken
- Run
eng_hiring_funnel_calculator.py - If offer-to-accept < 70%, comp is below market or close discipline is weak
4. Is the team structure healthy for the headcount?
5-9 ICs per squad; 5-8 ICs per EM; 4-6 EMs per director.
- Run
eng_team_structure_designer.py - Manager-trigger fires when 5+ ICs have no dedicated EM
- Director-trigger fires when 3+ EMs report directly to VPE/CTO
5. What's the production discipline maturity?
Level 1-5; aim for Level 3 at growth stage.
- On-call rotation ≥ 6 people
- Severity-defined incident response with blameless postmortems
- SLOs on customer-facing services (pair with
engineering/slo-architect/) - Continuous deployment OR scheduled — not "usually one, sometimes the other"
6. Are we adding a VPE separately, or is CTO doing both?
If CTO is spending > 50% on management vs strategy, VPE is needed.
- Or: VPE complement when CTO is co-founder more comfortable with strategy
- VPE owns operating model; CTO owns architecture
- At small scale (< 20 eng), one person can do both
Workflow
# 1. Delivery throughput
python ../../../skills/vpe-advisor/scripts/delivery_throughput_analyzer.py sprint_metrics.json
# 2. Hiring funnel
python ../../../skills/vpe-advisor/scripts/eng_hiring_funnel_calculator.py funnel.json
# 3. Team structure
python ../../../skills/vpe-advisor/scripts/eng_team_structure_designer.py team.json
Output Format
# VPE Review: <plan>
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
## The Decision Being Made
[throughput | hiring | structure | production | VPE-vs-CTO]
## Delivery Throughput (if applicable)
- DORA overall: Elite / High / Medium / Low
- Worst metric: <DF | LT | MTTR | FR>
- Bottleneck: <stage> (X% of cycle time)
- Top fix: <action + owner>
## Hiring Funnel (if applicable)
- End-to-end conversion: X%
- Weakest stage: <stage>
- Pipeline gap: +N candidates needed
- Top fix: <specific action>
## Team Structure (if applicable)
- Recommended: <informal pods / squads / tribes>
- Manager trigger fired: yes/no
- Director trigger fired: yes/no
- Action: <hire EM | hire director | split squad>
## Production Discipline (if applicable)
- Current maturity level: 1-5
- Next practice to add: <specific>
- SLO coverage: X / Y services
## Verdict
🟢 SHIP | 🟡 SHARPEN | 🔴 BLOCK
## Next Steps
[3 concrete actions]
Routing
/cs:cto-review— for architectural causes of throughput problemscs-chro-advisoragent — for hiring funnel comp/leveling issues/cs:cfo-review— for cost-per-hire envelope and eng budget/cs:ciso-review— for production discipline + compliance overlap/cs:decide— log the verdict/cs:freeze 30— on multi-year hiring commitments
Related
- Agent:
cs-vpe-advisor - Skill:
vpe-advisor - Adjacent:
../../../../engineering/slo-architect/,../../../../engineering/feature-flags-architect/,../../../../engineering/chaos-engineering/
Version: 1.0.0
Frequently asked questions about VPE Review
Similar skills
Turborepo
Optimized build system for JavaScript/TypeScript monorepos.
Azure Pipelines Validation
Streamline your Azure DevOps pipeline changes locally.
Azure Developer CLI
Streamline your Azure project workflows with best practices.
Azure Container Registry CLI
Manage Azure Container Registry resources with ease.
Aspire
Build and orchestrate polyglot distributed applications seamlessly.
Vercel CLI
Manage and deploy Vercel projects from the command line.
