
Analyzing Supply Chain Malware Artifacts
FreeInvestigate and analyze malware in supply chain attacks.
Free · Opens the source repo
What Analyzing Supply Chain Malware Artifacts does
The Analyzing Supply Chain Malware Artifacts skill provides a systematic approach to investigating supply chain attacks, which exploit trusted software distribution channels to deliver malicious payloads. This skill is particularly relevant in light of recent high-profile incidents like the SolarWinds SUNBURST attack and the 3CX SmoothOperator incident. It enables users to analyze trojanized software updates and compromised build pipelines, focusing on identifying intrusion vectors and understanding the scope of the compromise.
The skill includes a Python-based workflow that facilitates binary comparison analysis. By comparing trojanized binaries against their legitimate counterparts, users can detect injected code, identify changes in file structure, and analyze code signing anomalies. This process is crucial for forensic investigations and helps security teams reconstruct the infection timeline, assess downstream impacts, and extract indicators of compromise (IOCs) for further detection and blocking.
Designed for security analysts, incident responders, and threat hunters, this skill provides structured procedures and validation criteria that ensure thorough analysis of supply chain malware artifacts. Users will need a set of prerequisites, including Python 3.9+, specific libraries for binary analysis, and access to legitimate software versions for comparison. This skill is essential for those working in environments where supply chain integrity is critical, and it aids in building detection rules and threat hunting queries for supply chain-related threats.
When to use it
Use this skill when investigating security incidents involving supply chain malware or when developing detection mechanisms for such threats.
When not to use it
This skill may not be suitable for general malware analysis outside of supply chain contexts or for environments lacking the necessary prerequisites.
What you can build with it
Investigating Supply Chain Incidents
Use this skill to analyze malware in incidents like SolarWinds, where legitimate software was compromised.
Building Detection Rules
Develop tailored detection rules for identifying supply chain attack vectors based on the analysis provided by this skill.
Validating Security Coverage
Assess and validate your security monitoring coverage against known supply chain attack techniques.
How to install Analyzing Supply Chain Malware Artifacts
View source1. Install with the skills CLI
npx skills add mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills/analyzing-supply-chain-malware-artifacts --agent claude-code2. Or install it manually
Download the skill folder and drop it into ~/.claude/skills/ for all projects, or .claude/skills/ to scope it to one repo. Restart Claude Code so it picks up the new skill.
Anthropic's agentic coding CLI, and the reference implementation of Agent Skills. Drop a skill folder into ~/.claude/skills and Claude Code loads it automatically whenever a task matches the skill's description. Claude Code docs
Inside SKILL.md
Written by mukul975Analyzing Supply Chain Malware Artifacts
Overview
Supply chain attacks compromise legitimate software distribution channels to deliver malware through trusted update mechanisms. Notable examples include SolarWinds SUNBURST (2020, affecting 18,000+ customers), 3CX SmoothOperator (2023, a cascading supply chain attack originating from Trading Technologies), and numerous npm/PyPI package poisoning campaigns. Analysis involves comparing trojanized binaries against legitimate versions, identifying injected code in build artifacts, examining code signing anomalies, and tracing the infection chain from initial compromise through payload delivery. As of 2025, supply chain attacks account for 30% of all breaches, a 100% increase from prior years.
When to Use
- When investigating security incidents that require analyzing supply chain malware artifacts
- When building detection rules or threat hunting queries for this domain
- When SOC analysts need structured procedures for this analysis type
- When validating security monitoring coverage for related attack techniques
Prerequisites
- Python 3.9+ with
pefile,ssdeep,hashlib - Binary diff tools (BinDiff, Diaphora)
- Code signing verification tools (sigcheck, codesign)
- Software composition analysis (SCA) tools
- Access to legitimate software versions for comparison
- Package repository monitoring (npm, PyPI, NuGet)
Workflow
Step 1: Binary Comparison Analysis
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""Compare trojanized binary against legitimate version."""
import hashlib
import pefile
import sys
import json
def compare_pe_files(legitimate_path, suspect_path):
"""Compare PE file structures between legitimate and suspect versions."""
legit_pe = pefile.PE(legitimate_path)
suspect_pe = pefile.PE(suspect_path)
report = {"differences": [], "suspicious_sections": [], "import_changes": []}
# Compare sections
legit_sections = {s.Name.rstrip(b'\x00').decode(): {
"size": s.SizeOfRawData,
"entropy": s.get_entropy(),
"characteristics": s.Characteristics,
} for s in legit_pe.sections}
suspect_sections = {s.Name.rstrip(b'\x00').decode(): {
"size": s.SizeOfRawData,
"entropy": s.get_entropy(),
"characteristics": s.Characteristics,
} for s in suspect_pe.sections}
# Find new or modified sections
for name, props in suspect_sections.items():
if name not in legit_sections:
report["suspicious_sections"].append({
"name": name, "reason": "New section not in legitimate version",
"size": props["size"], "entropy": round(props["entropy"], 2),
})
elif abs(props["size"] - legit_sections[name]["size"]) > 1024:
report["suspicious_sections"].append({
"name": name, "reason": "Section size significantly changed",
"legit_size": legit_sections[name]["size"],
"suspect_size": props["size"],
})
# Compare imports
legit_imports = set()
if hasattr(legit_pe, 'DIRECTORY_ENTRY_IMPORT'):
for entry in legit_pe.DIRECTORY_ENTRY_IMPORT:
for imp in entry.imports:
if imp.name:
legit_imports.add(f"{entry.dll.decode()}!{imp.name.decode()}")
suspect_imports = set()
if hasattr(suspect_pe, 'DIRECTORY_ENTRY_IMPORT'):
for entry in suspect_pe.DIRECTORY_ENTRY_IMPORT:
for imp in entry.imports:
if imp.name:
suspect_imports.add(f"{entry.dll.decode()}!{imp.name.decode()}")
new_imports = suspect_imports - legit_imports
if new_imports:
report["import_changes"] = list(new_imports)
# Check code signing
report["legit_signed"] = bool(legit_pe.OPTIONAL_HEADER.DATA_DIRECTORY[4].Size)
report["suspect_signed"] = bool(suspect_pe.OPTIONAL_HEADER.DATA_DIRECTORY[4].Size)
return report
def hash_file(filepath):
"""Calculate multiple hashes for a file."""
hashes = {}
with open(filepath, 'rb') as f:
data = f.read()
for algo in ['md5', 'sha1', 'sha256']:
h = hashlib.new(algo)
h.update(data)
hashes[algo] = h.hexdigest()
return hashes
if __name__ == "__main__":
if len(sys.argv) < 3:
print(f"Usage: {sys.argv[0]} <legitimate_binary> <suspect_binary>")
sys.exit(1)
report = compare_pe_files(sys.argv[1], sys.argv[2])
print(json.dumps(report, indent=2))
Validation Criteria
- Trojanized components identified through binary diffing
- Injected code isolated and analyzed separately
- Code signing anomalies documented
- Infection timeline reconstructed from build artifacts
- Downstream impact scope assessed across affected systems
- IOCs extracted for detection and blocking
References
Frequently asked questions about Analyzing Supply Chain Malware Artifacts
Similar skills
Asset Criticality Scoring for Vulns
Prioritize vulnerabilities based on asset criticality.
Performing Alert Triage with Elastic SIEM
Streamline alert triage processes in Elastic Security.
Active Directory Vulnerability Assessment
Secure your Active Directory with comprehensive assessments.
Active Directory Investigation
Streamline your Active Directory compromise investigations.
Parsing Artifacts with Eric Zimmerman Tools
Efficiently parse Windows forensic artifacts for analysis.
Operationalizing MISP Threat Feeds
Enhance threat detection with curated MISP feeds.
