
Apex Test Class Generator
OfficialFreeStreamline your Apex testing with best practices and templates.
Free · Opens the source repo
What Apex Test Class Generator does
The Apex Test Class Generator skill simplifies the process of creating and validating Apex test classes in Salesforce. It provides a structured approach to writing tests that adhere to best practices, ensuring that your test methods are effective and maintainable. By using this skill, developers can generate test classes that follow established patterns, such as the TestDataFactory for data isolation and bulk testing with over 251 records, which is essential for meeting Salesforce's governor limits.
This skill is particularly useful for developers looking to enhance their test coverage and improve the reliability of their Apex code. It emphasizes the importance of clear and meaningful assertions, isolation of test data, and disciplined test-fix loops. With built-in templates and reference materials, users can quickly create test classes that not only validate functionality but also handle edge cases and exceptions effectively. This ensures that tests are comprehensive and that failures can be traced back to specific scenarios.
The workflow provided by this skill guides users through the process of gathering context, generating test classes, running tests, and analyzing results. It encourages a methodical approach to testing, which is crucial for maintaining high-quality code in production environments. By integrating this skill into your development process, you can streamline testing efforts and focus on delivering robust applications.
Overall, the Apex Test Class Generator is an essential tool for Salesforce developers who want to adhere to best practices in testing while saving time and reducing errors in their test code.
When to use it
Use this skill when developing new Apex test classes, improving existing tests, or implementing testing patterns for various Apex components.
When not to use it
This skill is not suitable for production Apex code or for Jest/LWC tests, as it is specifically designed for Apex testing.
What you can build with it
Generating New Test Classes
Quickly create new Apex test classes using the provided templates and best practice guidelines.
Improving Test Coverage
Enhance existing tests by applying disciplined test-fix loops and ensuring all scenarios are covered.
Debugging Failing Tests
Utilize the skill to analyze test failures and refine test methods to accurately capture edge cases.
How to install Apex Test Class Generator
View source1. Install with the skills CLI
npx skills add forcedotcom/sf-skills/platform-apex-test-generate --agent claude-code2. Or install it manually
Download the skill folder and drop it into ~/.claude/skills/ for all projects, or .claude/skills/ to scope it to one repo. Restart Claude Code so it picks up the new skill.
Anthropic's agentic coding CLI, and the reference implementation of Agent Skills. Drop a skill folder into ~/.claude/skills and Claude Code loads it automatically whenever a task matches the skill's description. Claude Code docs
Inside SKILL.md
Written by forcedotcomGenerating Apex Tests
Generate production-ready Apex test classes and run disciplined test-fix loops with coverage analysis.
Core Principles
- One behavior per method — each test method validates a single scenario. Separate positive, negative, and bulk tests. NEVER combine related-but-distinct inputs (e.g., null and empty) in one method — create
_NullInput_and_EmptyInput_as separate test methods - Bulkify tests — test with 251+ records to cross the 200-record trigger batch boundary. Batch Apex exception: in test context only one
execute()invocation runs, so setbatchSize >= testRecordCount. See references/async-testing.md - Isolate test data — every
@TestSetupmust delegate record creation to aTestDataFactoryclass. If none exists, create one first. Never build record lists inline in@TestSetup. Never rely on org data (SeeAllData=false) or hardcoded IDs. For duplicate rule handling, see references/test-data-factory.md - Assert meaningfully — use exact expected values computed from test data setup. NEVER use range assertions or approximate counts when the value is deterministic. Always include failure messages. See references/assertion-patterns.md
- Use
Assertclass only —Assert.areEqual,Assert.isTrue,Assert.fail, etc. Never use legacySystem.assert,System.assertEquals, orSystem.assertNotEquals - Mock external boundaries — use
HttpCalloutMockfor callouts,Test.setFixedSearchResultsfor SOSL, DML mock classes for database isolation. Design for testability via constructor injection. See references/mocking-patterns.md - Test negative paths — validate error handling and exception scenarios, not just happy paths
- Wrap with start/stop — pair
Test.startTest()withTest.stopTest()to reset governor limits and force async execution
Test.startTest() / Test.stopTest()
Always wrap the code under test in Test.startTest() / Test.stopTest():
- Resets governor limits so the test measures only the code under test
- Executes async operations synchronously (queueables, batch, future methods)
- Fires scheduled jobs immediately
Test Code Anti-Patterns
| Anti-Pattern | Fix |
|---|---|
| SOQL/DML inside loops | Query once before the loop; use Map<Id, SObject> for lookups |
| Magic numbers in assertions | Derive expected values from setup constants |
| God test class (>500 lines) | Split into multiple test classes by behavior area |
| Long test methods (>30 lines) | Extract Given/When/Then into helper methods |
Generic Exception catch | Catch the specific expected type (e.g., DmlException) |
Workflow
Step 1 — Gather Context
Before generating or fixing tests, identify:
- the target production class(es) under test
- existing test classes, test data factories, and setup helpers
- desired test scope (single class, specific methods, suite, or local tests)
- coverage threshold (75% minimum for deploy, 90%+ recommended)
- org alias when running tests against an org
Step 2 — Generate the Test Class
Apply the structure, naming conventions, and patterns from the asset templates and reference docs.
MANDATORY — File Deliverables: For every test class, create BOTH files:
{ClassName}Test.cls— the test class (use assets/test-class-template.cls as starting point){ClassName}Test.cls-meta.xml— the metadata file:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ApexClass xmlns="http://soap.sforce.com/2006/04/metadata">
<apiVersion>66.0</apiVersion>
<status>Active</status>
</ApexClass>
If no TestDataFactory exists in the project, create TestDataFactory.cls + TestDataFactory.cls-meta.xml using assets/test-data-factory-template.cls.
@TestSetup Example
@TestSetup
static void setupTestData() {
List<Account> accounts = TestDataFactory.createAccounts(251, true);
}
Test Method Structure
Use Given/When/Then:
@isTest
static void shouldUpdateStatus_WhenValidInput() {
// Given
List<Account> accounts = [SELECT Id FROM Account];
// When
Test.startTest();
MyService.processAccounts(accounts);
Test.stopTest();
// Then
List<Account> updated = [SELECT Id, Status__c FROM Account];
Assert.areEqual(251, updated.size(), 'All accounts should be processed');
}
Negative Test — Exception Pattern
Use try/catch with Assert.fail to verify expected exceptions:
@isTest
static void shouldThrowException_WhenInvalidInput() {
// Given
List<Account> emptyList = new List<Account>();
// When/Then
Test.startTest();
try {
MyService.processAccounts(emptyList);
Assert.fail('Expected MyCustomException to be thrown');
} catch (MyCustomException e) {
Assert.isTrue(e.getMessage().contains('cannot be empty'),
'Exception message should indicate empty input');
}
Test.stopTest();
}
Naming Convention
should[ExpectedResult]_When[Scenario]:shouldSendNotification_WhenOpportunityClosedWon[SubjectOrAction]_[Scenario]_[ExpectedResult]:AccountUpdate_ChangeName_Success
Step 3 — Run Tests
Start narrow when debugging; widen after the fix is stable.
# Single test class
sf apex run test --class-names MyServiceTest --result-format human --code-coverage --target-org <alias>
# Specific test methods
sf apex run test --tests MyServiceTest.shouldUpdateStatus_WhenValidInput --result-format human --target-org <alias>
# All local tests
sf apex run test --test-level RunLocalTests --result-format human --code-coverage --target-org <alias>
Step 4 — Analyze Results
Focus on:
- failing methods — exception types and stack traces
- uncovered lines and weak coverage areas
- whether failures indicate bad test data, brittle assertions, or broken production logic
Step 5 — Fix Loop
When tests fail, run a disciplined fix loop (max 3 iterations — stop and surface root cause if still failing):
- Read the failing test class and the class under test
- Identify root cause from error messages and stack traces
- Apply fix — adjust test data or assertions for test-side issues; delegate production code issues to the
platform-apex-generateskill - Rerun the focused test before broader regression
- Repeat until all tests pass, iteration limit reached, or root cause requires design change
Step 6 — Validate Coverage
| Level | Coverage | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Production deploy | 75% minimum | Required by Salesforce |
| Recommended | 90%+ | Best practice target |
| Critical paths | 100% | Business-critical code |
Cover all paths: positive, negative/exception, bulk (251+ records), callout/async.
What to Test by Component
| Component | Key Test Scenarios |
|---|---|
| Trigger | Bulk insert/update/delete, recursion guard, field change detection |
| Service | Valid/invalid inputs, bulk operations, exception handling |
| Controller | Page load, action methods, view state |
| Batch | start/execute/finish, scope matching (batch size >= record count), Database.Stateful tracking, error handling, chaining (separate methods — finish() calling Database.executeBatch() throws UnexpectedException) |
| Queueable | Chaining (only first job runs in tests), bulkification, error handling, callout mocks before Test.startTest() |
| Callout | Success response, error response, timeout |
| Selector | Valid/null/empty inputs, bulk (251+), field population, sort order, WITH USER_MODE via System.runAs |
| Scheduled | Direct execution via execute(null), CRON registration via CronTrigger query |
| Platform Event | Test.enableChangeDataCapture(), Test.getEventBus().deliver(), verify subscriber side effects |
Output Expectations
Deliverables per test class:
{ClassName}Test.cls+{ClassName}Test.cls-meta.xml(match API version of class under test; default66.0)TestDataFactory.cls+TestDataFactory.cls-meta.xml(if not already present)
Reference Files
Load on demand for detailed patterns:
| Reference | When to use |
|---|---|
| references/test-data-factory.md | TestDataFactory patterns, field overrides, duplicate rule handling |
| references/assertion-patterns.md | Assertion best practices, anti-patterns, common pitfalls |
| references/mocking-patterns.md | HttpCalloutMock, DML mocking, StubProvider, SOSL, Email, Platform Events |
| references/async-testing.md | Batch, Queueable, Future, Scheduled job testing |
Frequently asked questions about Apex Test Class Generator
Similar skills
Rhino 3D Scripting
Streamline your Rhinoceros 3D scripting tasks.
MVVM Toolkit
Streamline ViewModel development with source generators.
FreeCAD Scripts
Generate Python scripts for FreeCAD automation and modeling.
Azure Architecture Builder
Design and deploy Azure infrastructure using natural language.
Command Development
Streamline your command creation for Claude Code.
Create Cowork Plugin
Easily build and package plugins through guided sessions.
