
Auditing LLM Gateway Parity
FreeEnsure consistent API behavior between gateways.
Free Β· Opens the source repo
What Auditing LLM Gateway Parity does
The Auditing LLM Gateway Parity skill is designed to facilitate the comparison and auditing of the implementations between the Python-based llm-gateway and the Go-based ai-gateway within the PostHog ecosystem. This skill helps developers and engineers maintain a clear understanding of the current state of both gateways by updating the PARITY.md file based on the latest implementation evidence. It is particularly useful when changes occur in various aspects such as authentication, billing, or routing, ensuring that the gateways remain aligned in functionality and behavior.
When using this skill, it first fetches the latest commits from the PostHog repository to establish a baseline for comparison. It then inspects the relevant directories and files in both gateways to gather detailed information about routes, authentication methods, billing policies, and other critical components. The skill classifies the evidence into categories such as supported, blocking, or needing verification, allowing users to quickly identify any discrepancies that may affect the migration of callers between the two gateways.
This skill is particularly valuable for teams who are actively developing or maintaining integrations with the PostHog services, as it provides a systematic approach to auditing and documenting the parity between the two gateways. By keeping the PARITY.md file up to date, teams can ensure that they are aware of any changes that could impact their applications or services, thereby reducing the risk of unexpected behavior in production environments.
Overall, the Auditing LLM Gateway Parity skill is essential for developers and engineers working with PostHog's LLM gateways, enabling them to maintain consistency and reliability in their API integrations.
When to use it
Use this skill when changes are made to either gateway that could affect authentication, billing, or routing, or when reviewing changes in the Python gateway.
When not to use it
This skill is not suitable for migrating callers or for auditing unrelated services outside the LLM gateways.
What you can build with it
Auditing after Gateway Changes
After a change is made to the authentication method in the AI gateway, use this skill to audit and update the parity documentation.
Maintaining API Consistency
Regularly run this skill to ensure that any updates in the llm-gateway are reflected in the ai-gateway documentation.
Preparing for Migration
Before migrating callers from the Python gateway to the Go gateway, use this skill to identify any potential issues.
How to install Auditing LLM Gateway Parity
View source1. Install with the skills CLI
npx skills add posthog/posthog/auditing-llm-gateway-parity --agent claude-code2. Or install it manually
Download the skill folder and drop it into ~/.claude/skills/ for all projects, or .claude/skills/ to scope it to one repo. Restart Claude Code so it picks up the new skill.
Anthropic's agentic coding CLI, and the reference implementation of Agent Skills. Drop a skill folder into ~/.claude/skills and Claude Code loads it automatically whenever a task matches the skill's description. Claude Code docs
Inside SKILL.md
Written by posthogAuditing LLM gateway parity
Compare the current implementations of both gateways and update services/llm-gateway/PARITY.md. Keep this audit separate from caller migration.
Record source revisions
- Fetch
origin/masterand record its SHA as the PostHog baseline. - Audit the current working tree, including committed and uncommitted changes relative to that baseline. Do not ignore an in-flight gateway change because it is not on
masteryet. - Read the current
PostHog/ai-gatewaymain SHA withgh api repos/PostHog/ai-gateway/commits/mainand record it as the Go baseline. - If the audit is for an in-flight Go change, inspect that PR branch or working tree relative to
main. Treat its contracts as pending until the change merges; do not record them as currently supported. - Otherwise, inspect an authenticated checkout of
PostHog/ai-gatewayatmain.
Audit implementation code. README files and the existing parity table are starting points, not proof.
Inspect each contract
For the Python gateway, inspect:
services/llm-gateway/src/llm_gateway/api/for routes and wire behaviorservices/llm-gateway/src/llm_gateway/auth/for accepted credentialsservices/llm-gateway/src/llm_gateway/products/config.pyfor trusted product policy, models, and billingservices/llm-gateway/src/llm_gateway/rate_limiting/for budgets and limitsservices/llm-gateway/src/llm_gateway/callbacks/for event attributionposthog/llm/gateway_client.pyand real call sites for required contracts
For the Go gateway, inspect:
internal/httpapi/routes.goand dispatch packages for API shapesinternal/auth/andinternal/principal/for credential and identity policyinternal/httpapi/admission.go,internal/ledger/, andinternal/quota/for billing and limitsinternal/catalog/,internal/router/, andinternal/dispatch/for models, providers, translation, and failoverinternal/emitter/and request parsing for attribution and metadatadocs/product.mdfor intended and deferred contracts, verified against code
Check both request and response behavior. Matching route names do not prove parity for headers, streaming, errors, timeouts, retries, billing, or emitted events.
Classify the evidence
- β Supported: the Go gateway satisfies the contract.
- β Blocking: an active use case would lose auth, trusted attribution, billing policy, API, provider, or wire behavior.
- π Verify: support exists, but a caller must confirm configuration or behavior.
Do not treat caller-supplied telemetry as trusted policy. An ai_product event property does not replace product authentication, authorization, or billing.
Do not treat Python's unbilled flag as an automatic blocker. An internal workload can move to Go with a PostHog-owned team credential when debiting that wallet is the intended way to attribute PostHog spend. It is blocked only when it must preserve customer-specific billing policy or must debit no wallet.
For each difference, identify at least one affected use-case class. Remove details that do not change a migration decision.
Update the parity record
Update services/llm-gateway/PARITY.md with the evidence:
- Move use cases between supported, blocked, and verify sections.
- Add or remove migration-relevant contracts in the parity map.
- Update the source SHAs and verification date.
- Keep detailed Go design in
PostHog/ai-gateway.
When a gap closes, name obvious caller classes that are newly eligible to migrate. Do not modify those callers unless the user also asks for migration work. Use /migrating-llm-gateway-callers for that separate job.
Validate
Run:
pnpm exec oxfmt services/llm-gateway/PARITY.md .agents/skills/auditing-llm-gateway-parity/SKILL.md
pnpm exec markdownlint-cli2 --config .config/.markdownlint-cli2.jsonc services/llm-gateway/PARITY.md .agents/skills/auditing-llm-gateway-parity/SKILL.md
git diff --check
Frequently asked questions about Auditing LLM Gateway Parity
Similar skills
WinMD API Search
Easily find and explore Windows desktop APIs.
WebMCPify
Transform any web app into an agent-ready platform.
Phoenix Tracing
Instrument LLM applications with OpenInference tracing.
Foundry Hosted Agent CopilotKit
Guidance for developing agentic web apps on Azure.
Power Automate Foundation
Connect AI agents to Power Automate seamlessly.
Power Automate Flow Builder
Efficiently build and deploy Power Automate flows programmatically.
