New to Claude Skills? Learn how to install them →

alirezarezvani on GitHub

General Counsel Review

Free

Streamline contract reviews with essential legal questions.

Get this skill

Free · Opens the source repo

What General Counsel Review does

The General Counsel Review skill is designed for developers and designers who need to navigate complex legal documents such as contracts, term sheets, and regulatory commitments. By using the command /cs:gc-review <plan>, users can systematically interrogate the key legal aspects of a document before engaging outside counsel. This proactive approach helps identify potential risks and ensures that critical issues are highlighted for further discussion.

This skill presents six essential questions that serve as a framework for evaluating legal documents. These questions cover important topics such as IP ownership, liability and indemnity, data processing, termination rights, regulatory exposure, and employment considerations. Each question is crafted to uncover specific risks that could have significant implications for the business, especially in high-stakes situations like signing contracts over $100K or entering regulated markets.

The workflow is straightforward: after reading the document in question, users run the six questions to pinpoint the top three issues that require legal review. The output is structured to provide a clear summary of identified risks, recommendations for negotiation, and action items for outside counsel. This structured approach not only saves time but also enhances the clarity of communication with legal advisors.

Overall, the General Counsel Review skill is particularly beneficial for startups and businesses that frequently engage in contractual agreements or are entering new markets. By leveraging this skill, users can ensure they are asking the right questions and addressing potential legal pitfalls before they escalate.

When to use it

Use this skill before signing significant contracts, responding to term sheets, or entering regulated markets to ensure all legal bases are covered.

When not to use it

This skill is not a substitute for legal advice and should not be used for binding decisions without consulting qualified counsel.

What you can build with it

Pre-signing Contract Review

Before signing a contract over $100K, run this skill to identify potential legal issues.

Term Sheet Evaluation

Use this skill to assess a term sheet response and ensure all critical questions are addressed.

Regulatory Market Entry

Before entering a regulated market, utilize this skill to evaluate regulatory exposure and compliance.

How to install General Counsel Review

View source

1. Install with the skills CLI

npx skills add alirezarezvani/claude-skills/gc-review --agent claude-code

2. Or install it manually

Download the skill folder and drop it into ~/.claude/skills/ for all projects, or .claude/skills/ to scope it to one repo. Restart Claude Code so it picks up the new skill.

Anthropic's agentic coding CLI, and the reference implementation of Agent Skills. Drop a skill folder into ~/.claude/skills and Claude Code loads it automatically whenever a task matches the skill's description. Claude Code docs

Inside SKILL.md

Written by alirezarezvani

/cs:gc-review — General Counsel Forcing Questions

Command: /cs:gc-review <plan>

The General Counsel lens. Six questions before any contract, term sheet, IP move, or regulatory commitment. This is a lane gstack has zero of — and one where a single missed clause costs more than a year of engineering.

⚠️ Not legal advice. This command surfaces the right questions to ask before talking to outside counsel. Always engage qualified counsel for binding decisions.

When to Run

  • Before signing any contract > $100K or > 1 year
  • Before issuing equity (employee grants, advisor grants)
  • Before a term sheet response
  • Before entering a regulated market (healthcare, fintech, defense)
  • Before any open-source license decision in core IP
  • Before an M&A LOI

The Six GC Questions

1. IP Ownership

Who owns the IP being created or shared in this transaction?

  • Work-for-hire vs license vs joint.
  • For employees and contractors: written IP assignment in place?
  • For OSS: license compatibility checked?

2. Liability & Indemnity

What's the liability cap, and what's carved out from it?

  • Standard cap: 12 months of fees.
  • Carve-outs: IP infringement, data breach, willful misconduct.
  • Mutual indemnity desirable.

3. Data Processing

What personal data is involved, and is a DPA in place?

  • GDPR / CCPA scope?
  • Subprocessor flow-down?
  • Data residency requirements?

4. Termination & Renewal

What's the termination right, what's the notice period, and what's auto-renew?

  • Termination for convenience vs cause.
  • Notice period (30 / 60 / 90 days).
  • Auto-renewal trap?

5. Regulatory Surface

Does this expose the company to a new regulatory regime?

  • Healthcare → HIPAA.
  • Fintech → BSA/AML, state money-transmitter.
  • Medical device → FDA, MDR, ISO 13485.
  • Data → GDPR, CCPA, state breach laws.

6. Employment / Equity

If this is a hire or contractor: jurisdiction, classification, equity grant, IP assignment?

  • Misclassification risk?
  • Equity vesting standard (4-year, 1-year cliff)?
  • Acceleration triggers?
  • 409A current?

Workflow

  1. Read the contract / term sheet end to end
  2. Run the six questions
  3. Identify the top-3 issues that need outside counsel review
  4. Apply the verdict

Output Format

# GC Review: <plan>
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD

## Document
- Type: <contract / term sheet / grant / DPA>
- Counterparty: <name>
- $ value or scope: <amount>

## Issues
| # | Issue | Risk | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | <e.g., uncapped IP indemnity> | HIGH | Cap at fees paid, mutual |
| 2 | <e.g., 5-year auto-renew> | MED | 1-year max, 60-day notice |
| 3 | <e.g., no DPA, EU data> | HIGH | Require DPA before sign |

## Regulatory Trigger
- New regime triggered? <yes/no>
- Specific frameworks: <HIPAA / GDPR / etc.>

## Outside Counsel Action Items
- [ ] <specific item 1>
- [ ] <specific item 2>
- [ ] <specific item 3>

## Verdict
🟢 SIGN AS-IS (rare)
🟡 NEGOTIATE — counter on top-3 issues
🔴 DO NOT SIGN — material risk

Routing

  • /cs:ciso-review — for any data-touching contract
  • /cs:cfo-review — for any commitment > 1 year or > 1% of revenue
  • /cs:decide — log the verdict after outside counsel review

Workflow Integration with general-counsel-advisor skill

Since v2.5.1, this command is backed by a full skill at ../../../skills/general-counsel-advisor/ with two Python tools:

# Automated contract scan (12 founder-killer patterns)
python ../../../skills/general-counsel-advisor/scripts/contract_risk_scanner.py path/to/contract.txt

# Term sheet scoring (0-100 founder-friendliness)
python ../../../skills/general-counsel-advisor/scripts/term_sheet_analyzer.py path/to/term_sheet.json

The cs-general-counsel-advisor agent orchestrates both tools plus 3 references (contracts playbook, IP + regulatory, term sheet decoder).

Related


Version: 1.0.0

Frequently asked questions about General Counsel Review

Similar skills