
Investigating Insider Threat Indicators
FreeStreamline investigations of insider threats with SIEM analytics.
Free · Opens the source repo
What Investigating Insider Threat Indicators does
The Investigating Insider Threat Indicators skill is designed to assist security operations center (SOC) teams in effectively investigating potential insider threats. It leverages a combination of Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) analytics, Data Loss Prevention (DLP) alerts, and Human Resources (HR) data correlation to identify and analyze suspicious behaviors such as data exfiltration attempts, unauthorized access patterns, and policy violations. This skill is particularly useful when HR refers an employee for monitoring during their notice period or when anomalous data movement is detected by DLP systems.
To initiate an investigation, the skill requires proper legal authorization and a referral from HR, ensuring compliance with legal and privacy regulations. Once authorized, users can build a comprehensive activity timeline using SIEM data, allowing them to visualize user behavior over time. The skill provides specific queries to detect indicators of data exfiltration, such as bulk file downloads, USB usage, and unauthorized access to sensitive systems, enabling teams to pinpoint potential threats effectively.
This skill is ideal for organizations looking to enhance their insider threat detection capabilities and streamline their investigation processes. By correlating data from various sources, including DLP alerts and HR information, it helps SOC teams build a clearer picture of an employee's activities and intentions. The structured workflow ensures that investigations are thorough and compliant, making it a valuable tool for security professionals.
However, it is crucial to use this skill responsibly and only when appropriate legal and organizational protocols are in place. Insider threat investigations can be sensitive and must be handled with care to protect employee privacy and ensure compliance with applicable laws.
When to use it
Use this skill when there is a need to monitor an employee during their notice period or when DLP alerts indicate unusual data movement.
When not to use it
Do not use this skill without proper legal authorization, as insider threat investigations require coordination with HR, Legal, and Privacy teams.
What you can build with it
Monitoring Departing Employees
Use this skill to monitor employees who have submitted their resignation, ensuring compliance during their notice period.
Detecting Anomalous Data Movement
Leverage this skill when DLP alerts indicate unusual bulk data downloads or transfers to personal storage.
Building Investigation Timelines
Utilize the skill to create detailed timelines of employee activities based on SIEM data, aiding in thorough investigations.
How to install Investigating Insider Threat Indicators
View source1. Install with the skills CLI
npx skills add mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills/investigating-insider-threat-indicators --agent claude-code2. Or install it manually
Download the skill folder and drop it into ~/.claude/skills/ for all projects, or .claude/skills/ to scope it to one repo. Restart Claude Code so it picks up the new skill.
Anthropic's agentic coding CLI, and the reference implementation of Agent Skills. Drop a skill folder into ~/.claude/skills and Claude Code loads it automatically whenever a task matches the skill's description. Claude Code docs
Inside SKILL.md
Written by mukul975Investigating Insider Threat Indicators
When to Use
Use this skill when:
- HR refers a departing employee for monitoring during their notice period
- DLP alerts indicate bulk data downloads or transfers to personal storage
- UEBA detects anomalous access patterns deviating significantly from peer baselines
- Management reports concerns about an employee accessing sensitive data outside their role
Do not use without proper legal authorization — insider threat investigations must be coordinated with HR, Legal, and Privacy teams before monitoring begins.
Prerequisites
- Legal authorization and HR referral documenting investigation justification
- SIEM with DLP, endpoint, email, proxy, and authentication log sources
- Data Loss Prevention (DLP) system (Microsoft Purview, Symantec, Forcepoint) with policy alerts
- Endpoint monitoring capability (EDR with USB/removable media logging)
- HR data feed providing employment status, notice dates, and access entitlements
- Chain of custody procedures for evidence preservation
Workflow
Step 1: Establish Investigation Scope and Legal Authorization
Before any monitoring, ensure proper authorization:
INSIDER THREAT INVESTIGATION AUTHORIZATION
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Case ID: IT-2024-0089
Subject: [Employee Name] — [Department]
Authorized By: [CISO / General Counsel]
Referral Source: HR — Employee submitted resignation, 2-week notice
Justification: Employee has access to trade secrets and customer PII
Scope: Email, file access, USB, cloud storage, printing
Duration: 2024-03-15 to 2024-03-29 (notice period)
Privacy Review: Completed — compliant with acceptable use policy
Step 2: Build Activity Timeline from SIEM
Query comprehensive activity for the subject:
index=* (user="jsmith" OR src_user="jsmith" OR sender="jsmith@company.com"
OR SubjectUserName="jsmith")
earliest="2024-03-01" latest=now
| eval event_category = case(
sourcetype LIKE "%dlp%", "DLP",
sourcetype LIKE "%proxy%", "Web Access",
sourcetype LIKE "%email%", "Email",
sourcetype LIKE "%WinEventLog%", "Endpoint",
sourcetype LIKE "%o365%", "Cloud",
sourcetype LIKE "%vpn%", "VPN",
sourcetype LIKE "%badge%", "Physical Access",
1=1, sourcetype
)
| stats count by event_category, sourcetype, _time
| timechart span=1d count by event_category
Step 3: Detect Data Exfiltration Indicators
Bulk File Downloads (SharePoint/OneDrive):
index=o365 sourcetype="o365:management:activity" Operation IN ("FileDownloaded", "FileSynced")
UserId="jsmith@company.com" earliest=-30d
| stats count AS downloads, sum(eval(if(isnotnull(FileSize), FileSize, 0))) AS total_bytes,
dc(SourceFileName) AS unique_files
by UserId, SiteUrl, _time
| bin _time span=1d
| eval total_gb = round(total_bytes / 1073741824, 2)
| where downloads > 50 OR total_gb > 1
| sort - total_gb
USB/Removable Media Usage:
index=sysmon EventCode=1 Computer="WORKSTATION-JSMITH"
(CommandLine="*removable*" OR CommandLine="*usb*"
OR Image="*\\xcopy*" OR Image="*\\robocopy*")
| table _time, Computer, User, Image, CommandLine
| append [
search index=endpoint sourcetype="endpoint:device_connect"
user="jsmith" device_type="removable"
| table _time, user, device_name, device_serial, action
]
| sort _time
Email-Based Exfiltration:
index=email sourcetype="o365:messageTrace"
SenderAddress="jsmith@company.com"
| eval is_external = if(match(RecipientAddress, "@company\.com$"), 0, 1)
| eval has_attachment = if(isnotnull(AttachmentName), 1, 0)
| stats count AS total_emails,
sum(is_external) AS external_emails,
sum(has_attachment) AS with_attachments,
sum(eval(if(is_external=1 AND has_attachment=1, 1, 0))) AS external_with_attach,
sum(Size) AS total_size_bytes
by SenderAddress
| eval external_attach_pct = round(external_with_attach / total_emails * 100, 1)
| eval total_size_mb = round(total_size_bytes / 1048576, 1)
Cloud Storage Upload Detection:
index=proxy user="jsmith"
(dest IN ("*dropbox.com", "*drive.google.com", "*onedrive.live.com",
"*box.com", "*wetransfer.com", "*mega.nz")
OR category="cloud-storage")
http_method=POST
| stats count AS uploads, sum(bytes_out) AS total_uploaded
by user, dest, category
| eval uploaded_mb = round(total_uploaded / 1048576, 1)
| sort - uploaded_mb
Step 4: Analyze Access Pattern Anomalies
Accessing Sensitive Systems Outside Normal Scope:
index=auth user="jsmith" action=success earliest=-30d
| stats dc(app) AS unique_apps, values(app) AS apps_accessed by user
| join user type=left [
| inputlookup role_app_mapping.csv
| search role="Financial Analyst"
| stats values(authorized_app) AS authorized_apps by role
| eval user="jsmith"
]
| eval unauthorized = mvfilter(NOT match(apps_accessed, mvjoin(authorized_apps, "|")))
| where isnotnull(unauthorized)
| table user, unauthorized, authorized_apps
After-Hours and Weekend Activity:
index=* user="jsmith" earliest=-30d
| eval hour = tonumber(strftime(_time, "%H"))
| eval is_offhours = if(hour < 7 OR hour > 19, 1, 0)
| eval day = strftime(_time, "%A")
| eval is_weekend = if(day IN ("Saturday", "Sunday"), 1, 0)
| stats count AS total, sum(is_offhours) AS offhours, sum(is_weekend) AS weekend by user
| eval offhours_pct = round(offhours / total * 100, 1)
| eval weekend_pct = round(weekend / total * 100, 1)
Step 5: Correlate with HR and Physical Security Data
Compare activity to resignation timeline:
| makeresults
| eval user="jsmith",
resignation_date="2024-03-15",
last_day="2024-03-29",
access_revocation="2024-03-29 17:00"
| join user [
search index=* user="jsmith" earliest=-90d
| bin _time span=1d
| stats count AS daily_events, dc(sourcetype) AS data_sources by user, _time
]
| eval phase = case(
_time < relative_time(now(), "-30d"), "Normal (Pre-Resignation)",
_time >= strptime(resignation_date, "%Y-%m-%d") AND _time <= strptime(last_day, "%Y-%m-%d"),
"Notice Period",
1=1, "Transition"
)
| chart avg(daily_events) AS avg_events by phase
Badge/Physical Access Correlation:
index=badge_access employee_id="jsmith" earliest=-30d
| stats count AS badge_events, values(door_name) AS doors_accessed,
earliest(_time) AS first_badge, latest(_time) AS last_badge by employee_id
| eval areas = mvcount(doors_accessed)
Step 6: Preserve Evidence and Document Findings
Maintain chain of custody for all collected evidence:
import hashlib
import json
from datetime import datetime
evidence_log = {
"case_id": "IT-2024-0089",
"investigator": "soc_analyst_tier2",
"collection_time": datetime.utcnow().isoformat(),
"items": [
{
"item_id": "EV-001",
"description": "Splunk export — all user activity 2024-03-01 to 2024-03-15",
"file": "jsmith_activity_export.csv",
"sha256": hashlib.sha256(open("jsmith_activity_export.csv", "rb").read()).hexdigest(),
"collected_by": "analyst_doe",
"collection_method": "Splunk search export"
},
{
"item_id": "EV-002",
"description": "DLP alert details — 47 policy violations",
"file": "dlp_alerts_jsmith.json",
"sha256": hashlib.sha256(open("dlp_alerts_jsmith.json", "rb").read()).hexdigest(),
"collected_by": "analyst_doe",
"collection_method": "Microsoft Purview export"
}
]
}
with open(f"evidence_log_{evidence_log['case_id']}.json", "w") as f:
json.dump(evidence_log, f, indent=2)
Key Concepts
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Insider Threat | Risk posed by individuals with legitimate access who misuse it for unauthorized purposes |
| Data Exfiltration | Unauthorized transfer of data outside the organization via email, USB, cloud, or other channels |
| DLP | Data Loss Prevention — technology monitoring and blocking unauthorized data transfers based on content policies |
| Notice Period Monitoring | Enhanced surveillance of departing employees during their resignation-to-departure window |
| Chain of Custody | Documented evidence handling procedures ensuring forensic integrity for potential legal proceedings |
| Need-to-Know Violation | Accessing information or systems beyond what is required for an employee's role or current tasks |
Tools & Systems
- Microsoft Purview (formerly DLP): Data classification and loss prevention platform monitoring endpoints, email, and cloud storage
- Splunk UBA: User behavior analytics detecting insider threat patterns through ML-based anomaly detection
- Forcepoint Insider Threat: Dedicated insider threat detection platform with behavioral indicators and risk scoring
- DTEX InTERCEPT: Endpoint-based insider threat detection focusing on user activity metadata collection
- Code42 Incydr: Data risk detection platform specializing in file exfiltration monitoring across endpoints and cloud
Common Scenarios
- Departing Employee: Bulk download of customer lists and product roadmaps during two-week notice period
- Disgruntled Employee: After negative performance review, employee accesses executive salary data outside their role
- Contractor Overreach: External consultant accessing systems beyond contracted scope, downloading source code
- Account Misuse: Employee sharing credentials with unauthorized third party for competitive intelligence
- Sabotage Indicator: IT admin creating backdoor accounts and modifying system configurations before departure
Output Format
INSIDER THREAT INVESTIGATION REPORT — IT-2024-0089
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Subject: jsmith (Financial Analyst, Finance Dept)
Period: 2024-03-01 to 2024-03-15
Status: Employee resigned 2024-03-15, last day 2024-03-29
Key Findings:
[HIGH] 3,847 files downloaded from SharePoint (12.4 GB) — 10x peer average
[HIGH] USB device connected 14 times during notice period (0 times prior month)
[HIGH] 187 emails with attachments sent to personal Gmail
[MEDIUM] After-hours activity increased 340% during notice period
[MEDIUM] Accessed HR salary database 3 times (not authorized for role)
Timeline:
Mar 01-14: Normal activity baseline (avg 150 events/day)
Mar 15: Resignation submitted (activity spike to 890 events)
Mar 16-17: Weekend access — 2,100 SharePoint downloads
Mar 18: USB device first connected, DLP alert triggered
Evidence Collected: 4 items (SHA-256 verified, chain of custody documented)
Recommendation: Immediate access revocation recommended
Evidence package prepared for Legal review
Frequently asked questions about Investigating Insider Threat Indicators
Similar skills
Asset Criticality Scoring for Vulns
Prioritize vulnerabilities based on asset criticality.
Performing Alert Triage with Elastic SIEM
Streamline alert triage processes in Elastic Security.
Active Directory Vulnerability Assessment
Secure your Active Directory with comprehensive assessments.
Active Directory Investigation
Streamline your Active Directory compromise investigations.
Parsing Artifacts with Eric Zimmerman Tools
Efficiently parse Windows forensic artifacts for analysis.
Operationalizing MISP Threat Feeds
Enhance threat detection with curated MISP feeds.
