
Policy Rule Definition Generator
OfficialFreeStreamline Salesforce policy authoring with templates and validation.
Free · Opens the source repo
What Policy Rule Definition Generator does
The Policy Rule Definition Generator skill is designed for developers and designers working with Salesforce's Enforce-O-Matic metadata API. This skill provides a comprehensive framework for authoring PolicyRuleDefinition and PolicyRuleDefinitionSet XML files, which are essential for managing Data Cloud governance policies. By utilizing this skill, users can easily create and validate metadata files, ensuring they adhere to the required schema and UI compatibility rules. The skill includes a variety of templates and reference documents that simplify the authoring process, making it accessible even for those who may not be deeply familiar with the underlying XML structure.
When using this skill, developers will benefit from a structured approach to writing policy rules. It covers the full schema for different policy variants, including ACCESS, GOVERNANCE, RECORD, and TRANSFORM, allowing users to select the appropriate category and effect for their policies. The skill also provides validation guardrails that help prevent common errors during the authoring process. This is particularly useful when working on complex projects that require precise metadata definitions.
The skill is specifically tailored for tasks involving the creation of *.policyRuleDefinition and *.policyRuleDefinitionSet files, as well as adding fixtures for testing. It is not intended for other access-control metadata types such as UserAccessPolicy or PermissionSet, which are managed separately. By focusing on the Enforce-O-Matic API, this skill ensures that users can efficiently manage their governance policies without getting bogged down by irrelevant metadata types.
In summary, the Policy Rule Definition Generator skill is an invaluable tool for Salesforce developers looking to streamline their policy authoring process. With its focus on templates, validation, and comprehensive reference materials, it empowers users to create accurate and effective governance policies with ease.
When to use it
Use this skill when you need to create or edit PolicyRuleDefinition and PolicyRuleDefinitionSet files for Salesforce governance policies.
When not to use it
Do not use this skill for other types of access-control metadata, such as UserAccessPolicy or PermissionSet, as it is specifically designed for Enforce-O-Matic policies only.
What you can build with it
Creating Policy Definitions
Use this skill to generate new PolicyRuleDefinition files quickly and accurately, ensuring compliance with the required schema.
Editing Existing Policies
Leverage the templates and validation features to modify existing policy files while maintaining their integrity.
Testing Policy Rules
Add fixtures for testing your policy definitions to validate their functionality before deployment.
How to install Policy Rule Definition Generator
View source1. Install with the skills CLI
npx skills add forcedotcom/sf-skills/platform-policy-rule-generate --agent claude-code2. Or install it manually
Download the skill folder and drop it into ~/.claude/skills/ for all projects, or .claude/skills/ to scope it to one repo. Restart Claude Code so it picks up the new skill.
Anthropic's agentic coding CLI, and the reference implementation of Agent Skills. Drop a skill folder into ~/.claude/skills and Claude Code loads it automatically whenever a task matches the skill's description. Claude Code docs
Inside SKILL.md
Written by forcedotcomAuthoring Policy Rule Definitions
Gating: @WsdlGuard("EnforceOMatic.orgCanUsePolicyRuleMDAPI") = OrgPermissions.EnforceOMatic && OrgPermissions.PolicyRuleMDAPI
Min API version: 64.0 (66.0 for conditions using PolicyJsonExpression)
For human maintainers (not the agent): the Java source-of-truth lives at
enforce-o-matic-impl/java/src/enforce/o/matic/metadata/and reference fixtures atenforce-o-matic-impl/test/func/filemetadata/<name>/. The agent should rely on the templates and reference docs in this skill bundle — those impl paths are not readable from the Vibes/MCP runtime.
This skill covers the on-disk metadata XML format for authoring policies. Use it whenever a task asks to write a *.policyRuleDefinition or *.policyRuleDefinitionSet file, add a fixture under test/func/filemetadata/, or ship a metadata package. The runtime side (RuleProvider, hooks) is out of scope.
Eval coverage: This skill is exercised by the team's ADK eval framework, not by
tests/evals/under the skill directory. Five datasets covering the ACCESS / GOVERNANCE / RECORD / TRANSFORM variants live inpackages/adk-eval/eval/domains/platform-policy-rule-generate/datasets/.
1. Package Layout
A deployable package always contains:
<fixture>/
package.xml
policyRuleDefinitionSets/<setName>.policyRuleDefinitionSet
policyRuleDefinitions/<ruleName>.policyRuleDefinition
package.xml template (use <version>[ftest]</version> for ftests, 64.0 or higher for real orgs):
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<Package xmlns="http://soap.sforce.com/2006/04/metadata">
<types>
<members>Rule0</members>
<name>PolicyRuleDefinition</name>
</types>
<types>
<members>Set1</members>
<name>PolicyRuleDefinitionSet</name>
</types>
<version>64.0</version>
</Package>
2. PolicyRuleDefinitionSet Schema
<PolicyRuleDefinitionSet xmlns="http://soap.sforce.com/2006/04/metadata">
<label>Set1</label>
<description>Optional free text</description>
<replicated>false</replicated> <!-- MinAppVersion 260 -->
<builderCompatible>true</builderCompatible> <!-- MinAppVersion 262, author-settable -->
<!-- builderValidated: server-managed — do not set in authored XML -->
</PolicyRuleDefinitionSet>
| Element | Req | Notes |
|---|---|---|
<label> | yes | Master label. File basename (devName) is the MDAPI identifier, not the label. |
<description> | no | Free text. |
<replicated> | no | true triggers placeholder transformation across companion orgs. Omit for null/false. |
<builderCompatible> | no | true = rules audited per §7 checklist. false = API-only. Omit = unaudited. Informational only — no deploy/runtime effect. |
<builderValidated> | no | Server-managed. Never set in authored XML. Server overwrites on validation. |
3. PolicyRuleDefinition — Core Fields
| Element | Req | Notes |
|---|---|---|
<label> | yes | MasterLabel. |
<category> | yes | See §4. Drives resourceScopeType and whether policyRuleResourceDomains/resourceTransform are required. Does NOT constrain effect outside of TRANSFORM. |
<effect> | yes | Permit, Forbid, or Transform. The only category-coupling enforced by core: effect=Transform ↔ category=TRANSFORM_POLICY_RULE_DEFINITION (bidirectional). All other categories accept Permit and Forbid freely. |
<action> | yes (≥1) | Read, TupleRead, Create, etc. Multiple elements OR-combine. |
<policyRuleDefinitionSetName> | yes | Developer name of parent set. |
<principalScopeType> | yes | Always ANY. |
<resourceScopeType> | yes | ANY, FIELD, RECORD, DATASPACE, or SPAN. Must match category (§4). |
<principalAuthenticationLevel> | no | INTERNAL, AUTHENTICATED, UNIDENTIFIED, IDENTIFIED. |
<ruleConsumer> | no | ALL, DATACLOUD, MULESOFT, TABLEAU, CORE. |
<policyRuleResourceDomains> | no | Required for RECORD (RLS) and FIELD-scope TRANSFORM rules only. Forbidden on ACCESS/GOVERNANCE. |
<resourceTransform> | no | Required (and only valid) when category=TRANSFORM. |
<whenPolicyRuleDefinitionClauseConjunction> | no | WHEN conditions. |
<unlessPolicyRuleDefinitionClauseConjunction> | no | UNLESS conditions. Not UI-editable — prefer WHEN + negated operator. |
4. Category Decision Tree
Category names a domain (where in the platform's enforcement layers the rule applies). Effect names the action (allow / deny / transform). They are independent except for TRANSFORM.
The only Category × Effect rule the platform validates
(enforce-o-matic-api/java/src/enforce/o/matic/api/module/api/RuleBuilder.java):
effect=Transform⇔category=TRANSFORM_POLICY_RULE_DEFINITION(bidirectional; mismatched throwsINVALIDFORCATEGORY).- All other categories (
ACCESS,GOVERNANCE,RECORD,IDENTIFIED_RECORD) accept eitherPermitorForbid.
Note on the platform's auto-fill default: When
<category>is omitted from authored XML, the impl-side save hook (PolicyRuleDefinitionObject.saveHook_Validate) fills it in fromeffect:Permit→ACCESS,Forbid→GOVERNANCE,Transform→TRANSFORM. This is a default-fill, not a validation. If you author an explicit category that contradicts this default, it is accepted and persisted as-is.
Picking the category
What kind of policy?
│
├── OLS/FLS allow/deny on tagged or classified resources
│ category = ACCESS_POLICY_RULE_DEFINITION (allow/deny attestation in the access plane)
│ | GOVERNANCE_POLICY_RULE_DEFINITION (governance-audited)
│ effect = Permit | Forbid (chosen independently from category)
│ resourceScopeType = ANY | FIELD | DATASPACE
│ NO <policyRuleResourceDomains>
│ condition: resourcePath=TAG|CLASSIFICATION CONTAINS_ANY <ref>
│ For "objects AND all their fields" → action=TupleRead + OR-of-ENTITYTYPE clause (§7)
│ Note: "Block access to Foo object" → tag Foo with <yourTag>, write rule on tag
│ Do NOT use <resourceDomain>Foo</resourceDomain> — forbidden for ACCESS/GOVERNANCE
│
├── Row-level filter on a DMO/DLO
│ category = RECORD_POLICY_RULE_DEFINITION
│ effect = Permit | Forbid
│ resourceScopeType = RECORD
│ <policyRuleResourceDomains> = the DMO/DLO API name ← entity targeting allowed here
│
├── Identified-Guest record access
│ NOT authorable via MDAPI — SESSION_CONSUMER_ID is not in RuleContextPathType
│ Must be implemented as a runtime RuleProvider.
│
└── Field masking
category = TRANSFORM_POLICY_RULE_DEFINITION ← required by RuleBuilder validator
effect = Transform ← required by RuleBuilder validator
resourceScopeType = FIELD (structured) or SPAN (unstructured)
<policyRuleResourceDomains> = the DMO whose field is masked
<resourceTransform> required (e.g. NULL_RESOURCE_TRANSFORM, LAST_N_CHARS_RESOURCE_TRANSFORM)
ACCESS vs GOVERNANCE — how to choose
Both legally accept Permit and Forbid. Pick by which enforcement layer should record/audit the rule and what the prompt literally asks for:
| Use case | Pick | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| The prompt names "ACCESS policy rule" / "access rule" / "OLS/FLS" explicitly | ACCESS_POLICY_RULE_DEFINITION | Matches the prompt's vocabulary; sits in the data-access enforcement layer. |
| The prompt names "governance" / "audit" / "policy framework" / data-residency or compliance language | GOVERNANCE_POLICY_RULE_DEFINITION | Matches the prompt's vocabulary; rules surface in governance reporting. |
| Prompt is ambiguous and only describes allow/deny semantics | Default to ACCESS for Permit, GOVERNANCE for Forbid (mirrors the platform's auto-fill default; safe and deployable, but not required) |
Important — honor the explicit category in the prompt. If the prompt says "ACCESS policy rule that denies …" or "GOVERNANCE policy rule that permits …", emit exactly that category. Do not silently swap to the auto-fill default just because effect is Forbid (or Permit). The platform accepts both. The agent must not override the user's stated intent.
Scope × category compatibility — any combination outside this matrix throws INVALIDFORCATEGORY:
ACCESS | GOVERNANCE | TRANSFORM | RECORD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ANY | Yes | Yes | No | No |
DATASPACE | Yes | Yes | No | No |
FIELD | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
RECORD | No | No | No | Yes |
SPAN | No | No | Yes | No |
5. Condition Patterns (Quick Reference)
Every <conditions> block needs all four: <clause>, <operator>, one path element, and the value.
| Goal | path element | operator | value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Resource has tag | <resourcePath>TAG</resourcePath> | CONTAINS_ANY | <valueReferenceType>CUSTOM_TAG | STANDARD_TAG</valueReferenceType> |
| Resource has classification | <resourcePath>CLASSIFICATION</resourcePath> | CONTAINS_ANY | CUSTOM_CLASSIFICATION | STANDARD_CLASSIFICATION |
| Principal has permission | <principalPath>ASSIGNED_PERMISSIONS_PATH</principalPath> | CONTAINS_ANY | CONTAINS_NONE | <valueReferenceType>CUSTOM_PERMISSION</valueReferenceType> |
| Session in dataspace | <contextPath>SESSION_DATASPACE</contextPath> | CONTAINS_ANY | <valueReferenceType>DATASPACE</valueReferenceType> |
| Record field = user attribute | <resourcePath>RECORDFIELD</resourcePath> + <valueDomain>Schema:field</valueDomain> | EQUALS | <valuePrincipalPath>USER_ID | ORGANIZATION_ID | USER_ROLE_ID</valuePrincipalPath> |
| Entity type check | <resourcePath>ENTITYTYPE</resourcePath> | IS | <valueString>{"t":"Text","v":"FIELD"}</valueString> |
<conjunctionExpression> is 1-indexed prefix notation: 1, (AND 1 2), (OR 1 2), (AND (OR 1 2) (AND 3)). A bare top-level index like 1 is valid for deploy (impl fixtures use it) but crashes the Data Governance Policy Builder UI — see §7 if UI editability matters.
For full path enums (RulePrincipalPathType, RuleResourcePathType, RuleContextPathType), operators, and JSON expressions (PROJECTION / ARGLIST / SOQLTARGETLISTEXPR), see references/policy-schema-full.md.
For copy-paste templates for all policy variants, see references/templates.md.
6. Validation Guardrails
- Every
<conditions>needs an<operator>. Missing operator → reject. - Every
<conditions>needs at least one path element (<resourcePath>,<principalPath>,<contextPath>, or<valueDomain>). <contextPath>is exclusivelySESSION_DATASPACE. Never put a resource path value there.- Scope × category must be in the §4 matrix. Common offenders: ACCESS/GOVERNANCE + RECORD scope; RECORD + ANY/FIELD scope; TRANSFORM + ANY/RECORD scope. (Effect is independent of category except for TRANSFORM — see §4.)
<resourceTransform>andeffect=Transformare coupled. Transform effect needs a resourceTransform. Permit/Forbid must not have one.<policyRuleResourceDomains>is required for RECORD (RLS) and FIELD-scope TRANSFORM; forbidden on ACCESS/GOVERNANCE.<conjunctionExpression>indices must match actual<conditions>count. Off-by-one → reject.<clause>inside<conditions>must match the wrapper (WHENinside<when…>,UNLESSinside<unless…>).- JSON literals in
<valueString>must escape"to". Wrong escaping silently corrupts the literal. - Reference targets (
<valueReference>,<resourceDomain>) must exist in the target org at deploy time. SCALAR_ATTRIBUTE/PLURAL_ATTRIBUTEare not inRulePrincipalPathType— not in MDAPI contract. Use a runtime RuleProvider for those shapes.IDENTIFIED_RECORDis not authorable via MDAPI —SESSION_CONSUMER_IDnot inRuleContextPathType.- Standard tag/classification dev names are fully-qualified dotted paths (e.g.
DataGovernanceTags.ExternalData.Visibility.Public). Retrieve an existing rule to get the exact string before authoring. - Min API versions:
PolicyRuleDefinition= 64.0;PolicyJsonExpressionconditions = 66.0;<replicated>= 260+;<builderCompatible>/<builderValidated>= 262+.
Note on
<conjunctionExpression>shape: A bare top-level index (e.g.<conjunctionExpression>1</conjunctionExpression>) deploys cleanly — the impl-side parser accepts bare tokens at the top level, and most positive single-condition fixtures inenforce-o-matic-impl/test/func/filemetadata/use it. It is not a deploy-time validation error. It does, however, crash the Data Governance Policy Builder UI on load — see §7.
7. UI Compatibility — Core Rules
The Data Governance Policy Builder edits a strict subset of the MDAPI. Default goal: produce UI-compatible policies. Always confirm with the operator before producing API-only XML.
Hard blockers — any of these make the policy uneditable (and several crash the builder on load):
- Missing OR-of-ENTITYTYPE clause on ACCESS/GOVERNANCE rules → hard crash:
Cannot use 'in' operator to search for 'Permit' in undefined. Required even when paired withTupleRead(where it's functionally redundant at runtime). Must includeISconditions for{"t":"Text","v":"OBJECT"}and{"t":"Text","v":"FIELD"}. - Bare top-level condition index in
<conjunctionExpression>(e.g.1, or(AND (OR 1 2) 3)) → crash on builder load inbuildCriteria. Deploy is unaffected, but the policy is uneditable in the UI. Always wrap:(AND 1)for a single condition;(AND (OR 1 2) (AND 3))instead of(AND (OR 1 2) 3). category = ACCESS_POLICY_RULE_DEFINITION+effect = Forbid→ the Data Governance Policy Builder UI (not MDAPI) collapses it to GOVERNANCE on save; round-trip via the builder will rewrite the category. MDAPI deploy is unaffected — the original ACCESS+Forbid combination is valid and deploys without modification. If your goal is UI round-trippability, prefer GOVERNANCE for Forbid; if the source of truth is MDAPI, ACCESS+Forbid is fine.- Any
<unlessPolicyRuleDefinitionClauseConjunction>block → silently dropped on first UI save. - More than one
<action>→ only the first is kept. ruleConsumer≠DATACLOUD→ UI hardcodes DATACLOUD on save.- Top-level
(OR 1 2)conjunction → triggers// ERROR: Unsupported rule!path, rule silently dropped.
UI-compatible "unless" rewrite:
| Author intent | UI-compatible shape |
|---|---|
unless principal has permission X | WHEN ASSIGNED_PERMISSIONS_PATH CONTAINS_NONE X |
unless resource has tag X | WHEN TAG CONTAINS_NONE X |
unless record field = value | WHEN RECORDFIELD NOT_EQUALS value |
For the full UI-compatibility checklist, round-trip rules, and operator support matrix, see references/ui-compatibility.md.
8. Authoring Workflow
- Start from the closest template in
references/templates.md— modify from there, don't start blank. - Pick category first (§4). Category fixes effect, resourceScopeType, and whether policyRuleResourceDomains/resourceTransform are required.
- Lay out the bare rule: top-level fields only, no conditions. Match the category template in
references/templates.md. - Add conditions one at a time, each with all four anchors:
<clause>,<operator>, one path element, and the value. - Update
<conjunctionExpression>— 1-indexed prefix notation. Bare top-level index (e.g.1) deploys but breaks the UI; wrap as(AND 1)if UI editability matters (§7). - Run the UI-compatibility check (§7 /
references/ui-compatibility.md). If any item trips, attempt the "unless" rewrite first; if not possible, get explicit operator confirmation before continuing. - Update
package.xml— list each<members>for both types. - Set
<builderCompatible>on the set totrueif §7 checklist passes;falseif intentionally API-only. - Sanity-check against §6 (guardrails) before considering done.
- Validate with dry-run before any non-dry deploy to a persistent org. Surface errors using the error reference in
references/deploy-errors.md.
Three-layer correctness check before done:
- Runtime / Cedar — does the rule enforce what's intended? (action choice, condition shape)
- MDAPI deploy validity — does it deploy? (§6 guardrails, scope×category, tag dev names, org perms)
- UI editability — can the builder render and re-save it? (§7 checklist, OR-of-ENTITYTYPE requirement)
Reference Docs
| Detail | File |
|---|---|
| Full path enums, operators, value sets, JSON expressions (PROJECTION / ARGLIST / SOQLTARGETLISTEXPR) | references/policy-schema-full.md |
Copy-paste templates — index at references/templates.md; per-variant: templates-access.md, templates-record.md, templates-transform.md, templates-advanced.md | |
| Full UI-compatibility checklist, round-trip rules, operator/path support matrix | references/ui-compatibility.md |
Frequently asked questions about Policy Rule Definition Generator
Similar skills
WinMD API Search
Easily find and explore Windows desktop APIs.
WebMCPify
Transform any web app into an agent-ready platform.
Phoenix Tracing
Instrument LLM applications with OpenInference tracing.
Foundry Hosted Agent CopilotKit
Guidance for developing agentic web apps on Azure.
Power Automate Foundation
Connect AI agents to Power Automate seamlessly.
Power Automate Flow Builder
Efficiently build and deploy Power Automate flows programmatically.
