
Precision Medicine Stratification
FreeOptimize patient treatment through genomic insights.
Free · Opens the source repo
What Precision Medicine Stratification does
The Precision Medicine Patient Stratification skill enables healthcare professionals to transform genomic and clinical data into actionable insights for patient treatment. By integrating various data types, this skill allows users to categorize patients into responder/non-responder groups, risk tiers, or treatment-decision groups based on their unique profiles. This stratification is crucial for personalized medicine, where understanding the nuances of each patient's genetic makeup can directly influence treatment decisions and outcomes.
The skill emphasizes a structured approach to patient stratification, guiding users through key questions that must be answered before utilizing any tools. It highlights the importance of identifying actionable molecular features that can predict treatment responses, ensuring that the selected biomarkers have therapeutic implications. By following a rigorous evidence-based framework, users can assess the strength of their findings and make informed decisions about treatment options.
With a focus on multi-level integration of data, the skill supports a variety of disease types, including cancer, metabolic disorders, cardiovascular diseases, and rare conditions. It provides a comprehensive workflow that includes disease disambiguation, genetic risk assessment, and pharmacogenomic profiling, ultimately leading to personalized therapeutic strategies. The output is quantitatively assessed through a Precision Medicine Risk Score, allowing for clear communication of risk levels and treatment recommendations.
This skill is particularly suited for oncologists, geneticists, and healthcare professionals involved in precision medicine initiatives. By utilizing this tool, they can enhance their ability to deliver tailored treatment plans that consider the genetic and clinical complexities of their patients.
When to use it
Use this skill when you need to stratify patients for precision medicine based on genomic and clinical data, particularly for treatment selection and prognosis prediction.
When not to use it
This skill is not suitable for single variant interpretation or immunotherapy-specific predictions; consider other specialized tools for those needs.
What you can build with it
Cancer Treatment Selection
Use this skill to stratify cancer patients based on genomic data to determine the most effective treatment options.
Metabolic Disorder Risk Assessment
Apply this skill to assess risk levels in patients with metabolic disorders, guiding personalized management plans.
Comprehensive Patient Profiling
Leverage this skill for integrated patient profiling that combines genomic, clinical, and therapeutic data for better healthcare outcomes.
How to install Precision Medicine Stratification
View source1. Install with the skills CLI
npx skills add mims-harvard/tooluniverse/tooluniverse-precision-medicine-stratification --agent claude-code2. Or install it manually
Download the skill folder and drop it into ~/.claude/skills/ for all projects, or .claude/skills/ to scope it to one repo. Restart Claude Code so it picks up the new skill.
Anthropic's agentic coding CLI, and the reference implementation of Agent Skills. Drop a skill folder into ~/.claude/skills and Claude Code loads it automatically whenever a task matches the skill's description. Claude Code docs
Inside SKILL.md
Written by mims-harvardPrecision Medicine Patient Stratification
Transform patient genomic and clinical profiles into actionable risk stratification, treatment recommendations, and personalized therapeutic strategies.
Reasoning Before Searching
Stratification means splitting patients into groups that respond differently to a treatment or have different prognoses. Ask these questions before running any tools:
- What molecular feature predicts response? Candidates: somatic mutation (e.g., EGFR L858R), germline variant (e.g., BRCA1 LoF), expression level (e.g., HER2 overexpression), germline pharmacogenomic variant (e.g., CYP2C19 PM), or composite biomarker (e.g., TMB-H + MSI-H).
- Is the predictive feature actionable? Knowing it must change treatment — either the drug choice, dose, or monitoring plan. A variant with prognostic value but no therapeutic consequence is not a stratification biomarker.
- What is the evidence level for the stratifier? FDA-approved companion diagnostic (T1) vs. exploratory (T4) changes how much weight to place on the finding.
Route to the correct Phase 3 path BEFORE running Phase 2 tools — cancer, metabolic, CVD, rare disease, and autoimmune pipelines require different stratifiers.
LOOK UP DON'T GUESS: Never assume a variant is pathogenic, never assume a gene is relevant to a disease, never assign metabolizer status without PharmGKB or CPIC evidence.
KEY PRINCIPLES:
- Report-first - Create report file FIRST, then populate progressively
- Disease-specific logic - Cancer vs metabolic vs rare disease pipelines diverge at Phase 3
- Multi-level integration - Germline + somatic + expression + clinical data layers
- Evidence-graded - Every finding has an evidence tier (T1-T4)
- Quantitative output - Precision Medicine Risk Score (0-100)
- Source-referenced - Every statement cites the tool/database source
- English-first queries - Always use English terms in tool calls
Reference files (same directory):
TOOLS_REFERENCE.md- Tool parameters, response formats, phase-by-phase tool listsSCORING_REFERENCE.md- Scoring matrices, risk tiers, pathogenicity tables, PGx tablesREPORT_TEMPLATE.md- Output report template, treatment algorithms, completeness requirementsEXAMPLES.md- Six worked examples (cancer, metabolic, NSCLC, CVD, rare, neuro)QUICK_START.md- Sample prompts and output summary
COMPUTE, DON'T DESCRIBE
When analysis requires computation (statistics, data processing, scoring, enrichment), write and run Python code via Bash. Don't describe what you would do — execute it and report actual results. Use ToolUniverse tools to retrieve data, then Python (pandas, scipy, statsmodels, matplotlib) to analyze it.
When to Use
Apply when user asks about patient risk stratification, treatment selection, prognosis prediction, or personalized therapeutic strategy for any disease with genomic/clinical data.
NOT for (use other skills instead):
- Single variant interpretation ->
tooluniverse-variant-interpretation - Immunotherapy-specific prediction ->
tooluniverse-immunotherapy-response-prediction - Drug safety profiling only ->
tooluniverse-adverse-event-detection - Target validation ->
tooluniverse-drug-target-validation - Clinical trial search only ->
tooluniverse-clinical-trial-matching - Drug-drug interaction only ->
tooluniverse-drug-drug-interaction - PRS calculation only ->
tooluniverse-polygenic-risk-score
Input Parsing
Required
- Disease/condition: Free-text disease name
- At least one of: Germline variants, somatic mutations, gene list, or clinical biomarkers
Optional (improves stratification)
- Age, sex, ethnicity, disease stage, comorbidities, prior treatments, family history
- Current medications (for DDI and PGx), stratification goal
Disease Type Classification
Classify into one category (determines Phase 3 routing):
| Category | Examples |
|---|---|
| CANCER | Breast, lung, colorectal, melanoma |
| METABOLIC | Type 2 diabetes, obesity, NAFLD |
| CARDIOVASCULAR | CAD, heart failure, AF |
| NEUROLOGICAL | Alzheimer, Parkinson, epilepsy |
| RARE/MONOGENIC | Marfan, CF, sickle cell, Huntington |
| AUTOIMMUNE | RA, lupus, MS, Crohn's |
Critical Tool Parameter Notes
See TOOLS_REFERENCE.md for full details. Key gotchas:
- MyGene_query_genes: param is
query(NOTq) - EnsemblVEP_annotate_rsid: param is
variant_id(NOTrsid) - ensembl_lookup_gene: REQUIRES
species='homo_sapiens' - DrugBank tools: ALL require 4 params:
query,case_sensitive,exact_match,limit - cBioPortal_get_mutations:
gene_listis a STRING (space-separated), not array - PubMed_search_articles: Returns a plain list of dicts, NOT
{articles: [...]} - fda_pharmacogenomic_biomarkers: Use
limit=1000for all results - gnomAD: May return "Service overloaded" - skip gracefully
- OpenTargets: Always nested
{data: {entity: {field: ...}}}structure
Workflow Overview
Phase 1: Disease Disambiguation & Profile Standardization
Phase 2: Genetic Risk Assessment
Phase 3: Disease-Specific Molecular Stratification (routes by disease type)
Phase 4: Pharmacogenomic Profiling
Phase 5: Comorbidity & Drug Interaction Risk
Phase 6: Molecular Pathway Analysis
Phase 7: Clinical Evidence & Guidelines
Phase 8: Clinical Trial Matching
Phase 9: Integrated Scoring & Recommendations
Phase 1: Disease Disambiguation & Profile Standardization
- Resolve disease to EFO ID using
OpenTargets_get_disease_id_description_by_name - Classify disease type (CANCER/METABOLIC/CVD/NEUROLOGICAL/RARE/AUTOIMMUNE)
- Parse genomic data into structured format (gene, variant, type)
- Resolve gene IDs using
MyGene_query_genesto get Ensembl/Entrez IDs
Phase 2: Genetic Risk Assessment
- Germline variant pathogenicity:
ClinVar_search_variants,EnsemblVEP_annotate_rsid/_hgvs - Gene-disease association:
OpenTargets_target_disease_evidence - GWAS polygenic risk:
gwas_get_associations_for_trait,OpenTargets_search_gwas_studies_by_disease - Population frequency:
gnomad_get_variant - Gene constraint:
gnomad_get_gene_constraints(pLI, LOEUF scores)
Scoring: See SCORING_REFERENCE.md for genetic risk score component (0-35 points).
Phase 3: Disease-Specific Molecular Stratification
CANCER PATH
- Molecular subtyping:
cBioPortal_get_mutations,HPA_get_cancer_prognostics_by_gene - TMB/MSI/HRD:
fda_pharmacogenomic_biomarkersfor FDA cutoffs - Prognostic stratification: Combine stage + molecular features
METABOLIC PATH
- Genetic risk integration:
GWAS_search_associations_by_gene,OpenTargets_target_disease_evidence - Complication risk: Based on HbA1c, duration, existing complications
CVD PATH
- FH gene check:
ClinVar_search_variantsfor LDLR, APOB, PCSK9 - Statin PGx:
PharmGKB_get_clinical_annotationsfor SLCO1B1
RARE DISEASE PATH
- Causal variant identification:
ClinVar_search_variants - Genotype-phenotype:
UniProt_get_disease_variants_by_accession
Scoring: See SCORING_REFERENCE.md for disease-specific tables.
Phase 4: Pharmacogenomic Profiling
- Drug-metabolizing enzymes:
PharmGKB_get_clinical_annotations,PharmGKB_get_dosing_guidelines - FDA PGx biomarkers:
fda_pharmacogenomic_biomarkers(uselimit=1000) - Treatment-specific PGx:
PharmGKB_get_drug_details
Scoring: See SCORING_REFERENCE.md for PGx risk score (0-10 points).
Phase 5: Comorbidity & Drug Interaction Risk
- Disease overlap:
OpenTargets_get_associated_targets_by_disease_efoId - DDI check:
drugbank_get_drug_interactions_by_drug_name_or_id,FDA_get_drug_interactions_by_drug_name - PGx-amplified DDI: If PM genotype + CYP inhibitor, flag compounded risk
Phase 6: Molecular Pathway Analysis
- Pathway enrichment:
enrichr_gene_enrichment_analysis(libs:KEGG_2021_Human,Reactome_2022,GO_Biological_Process_2023) - Reactome mapping:
ReactomeAnalysis_pathway_enrichment,Reactome_map_uniprot_to_pathways - Network analysis:
STRING_get_interaction_partners,STRING_functional_enrichment - Druggable targets:
OpenTargets_get_target_tractability_by_ensemblID
Phase 7: Clinical Evidence & Guidelines
- Guidelines search:
PubMed_Guidelines_Search(fallback:PubMed_search_articles) - FDA-approved therapies:
OpenTargets_get_associated_drugs_by_disease_efoId,FDA_get_indications_by_drug_name - Biomarker-drug evidence:
civic_search_evidence_items,civic_search_assertions
Phase 8: Clinical Trial Matching
- Biomarker-driven trials:
search_clinical_trialswith condition + intervention - Precision medicine trials:
search_clinical_trialsfor basket/umbrella trials
Phase 9: Integrated Scoring & Recommendations
Score Components (total 0-100)
- Genetic Risk (0-35): Pathogenicity + gene-disease association + PRS
- Clinical Risk (0-30): Stage/biomarkers/comorbidities
- Molecular Features (0-25): Driver mutations, subtypes, actionable targets
- Pharmacogenomic Risk (0-10): Metabolizer status, HLA alleles
Risk Tiers
| Score | Tier | Management |
|---|---|---|
| 75-100 | VERY HIGH | Intensive treatment, subspecialty referral, clinical trial |
| 50-74 | HIGH | Aggressive treatment, close monitoring |
| 25-49 | INTERMEDIATE | Standard guideline-based care, PGx-guided dosing |
| 0-24 | LOW | Surveillance, prevention, risk factor modification |
Output
Generate report per REPORT_TEMPLATE.md. See SCORING_REFERENCE.md for detailed scoring matrices.
Common Use Patterns
See EXAMPLES.md for six detailed worked examples:
- Cancer + actionable mutation: Breast cancer, BRCA1, ER+/HER2- -> Score ~55-65 (HIGH)
- Metabolic + PGx concern: T2D, CYP2C19 PM on clopidogrel -> Score ~55-65 (HIGH)
- NSCLC comprehensive: EGFR L858R, TMB 25, PD-L1 80% -> Score ~75-85 (VERY HIGH)
- CVD risk: LDL 190, SLCO1B1*5, family hx MI -> Score ~50-60 (HIGH)
- Rare disease: Marfan, FBN1 variant -> Score ~55-65 (HIGH)
- Neurological risk: APOE e4/e4, family hx Alzheimer's -> Score ~60-72 (HIGH)
Frequently asked questions about Precision Medicine Stratification
Similar skills
Power BI Semantic Modeling
Optimize your Power BI data models with best practices.
Data Context Extractor
Tailor data analysis skills to your company's needs.
Power BI Performance Troubleshooting
Systematic guidance for optimizing Power BI performance.
Power BI Model Design Review
Optimize your Power BI data models with expert reviews.
Power BI DAX Formula Optimizer
Optimize your DAX formulas for better performance and clarity.
Fabric Lakehouse
Optimize your data solutions with Lakehouse best practices.
