
Research
FreeMulti-agent web research with verified outputs.
Free · Opens the source repo
What Research does
The Research skill enables users to conduct comprehensive web research across multiple sources while ensuring the accuracy of the information retrieved. It employs a multi-agent approach, utilizing different AI agents to gather data and cross-verify findings before delivering the results to the user. This skill is particularly useful for those who require reliable information quickly, as it can scale from quick lookups to in-depth investigations, depending on the user's needs.
The skill offers four distinct modes of research: Quick, Standard, Extensive, and Deep Investigation. Each mode varies in the number of agents involved and the depth of the investigation. For instance, the Quick mode utilizes a single agent for fast responses, while the Extensive mode engages multiple agents and independent verifiers for a more thorough analysis. This flexibility allows users to choose the appropriate depth based on their specific requirements.
A key feature of the Research skill is its mandatory URL verification process, which ensures that every link provided in the output is valid and leads to credible sources. This is crucial as it minimizes the risk of hallucinated URLs that could mislead users. Additionally, the skill is designed to handle sentiment analysis by routing relevant queries to community sources like Reddit and YouTube before performing standard web searches. This ensures that user inquiries about public opinion or community sentiment are addressed accurately.
Overall, the Research skill is an essential tool for developers, designers, and professionals who need reliable information quickly and efficiently. By leveraging multiple agents and rigorous verification processes, it addresses common pitfalls associated with traditional single-agent research methods, providing users with confidence in the information they receive.
When to use it
Use this skill whenever you need to conduct research on a topic, whether it's a quick lookup or an extensive investigation.
When not to use it
Avoid using this skill for deep background checks on people or entities, or for academic papers, as it is not designed for those purposes.
What you can build with it
Quick Lookup for Product Reviews
Use the Quick mode to rapidly gather product reviews and user opinions from various sources.
In-Depth Competitive Analysis
Engage the Extensive mode to analyze competitors by cross-referencing multiple sources and verifying claims.
Community Sentiment Research
Utilize the skill to investigate public sentiment on recent events by routing queries to community platforms before broader searches.
How to install Research
View source1. Install with the skills CLI
npx skills add danielmiessler/lifeos/Research --agent claude-code2. Or install it manually
Download the skill folder and drop it into ~/.claude/skills/ for all projects, or .claude/skills/ to scope it to one repo. Restart Claude Code so it picks up the new skill.
Anthropic's agentic coding CLI, and the reference implementation of Agent Skills. Drop a skill folder into ~/.claude/skills and Claude Code loads it automatically whenever a task matches the skill's description. Claude Code docs
Inside SKILL.md
Written by danielmiessler⚠️ MANDATORY TRIGGER
When user says "research" (in any form), ALWAYS invoke this skill.
| User Says | Action |
|---|---|
| "research" / "do research" / "research this" | → Standard mode (3 agents: Claude + Gemini + Perplexity + cross-check) |
| "quick research" / "minor research" | → Quick mode (1 Perplexity agent) |
| "extensive research" / "deep research" | → Extensive mode (7 explorers + 2 verifiers) |
| "deep investigation" / "investigate [topic]" / "map the [X] landscape" | → Deep Investigation (iterative + verification) |
"Research" alone = Standard mode. No exceptions.
Deterministic alternative (EXPERIMENTAL — not yet run in the harness): Workflows/research.mjs ports Standard + Extensive into a Workflow-tool script — fixed researcher roster, single batch URL-verify, cross-checked synthesis. It is parse-verified and contract-checked but has NOT yet had a live harness run, so the prose StandardResearch.md / ExtensiveResearch.md stay the default path. Do not route real research through the .mjs until one smoke run lands. To do that smoke run: Workflow({ scriptPath: "skills/Research/Workflows/research.mjs", args: { question: "<trivial test>", depth: "standard" } }). Once it runs clean, drop this experimental caveat.
Customization
Before executing, check for user customizations at:
~/.claude/LIFEOS/USER/CUSTOMIZATIONS/SKILLS/Research/
If this directory exists, load and apply any PREFERENCES.md, configurations, or resources found there. These override default behavior. If the directory does not exist, proceed with skill defaults.
🚨 MANDATORY: Voice Notification (REQUIRED BEFORE ANY ACTION)
You MUST send this notification BEFORE doing anything else when this skill is invoked.
-
Send voice notification:
curl -s -X POST http://localhost:31337/notify \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"message": "Running the WORKFLOWNAME workflow in the Research skill to ACTION"}' \ > /dev/null 2>&1 & -
Output text notification:
Running the **WorkflowName** workflow in the **Research** skill to ACTION...
This is not optional. Execute this curl command immediately upon skill invocation.
Research Skill
What It Does
Researches a topic across multiple sources and verifies every claim before delivery. Four depth modes scale from a single fast lookup to a multi-session investigation: Quick (1 agent, ~10-15s), Standard (3 agents cross-checked, ~30-60s), Extensive (7 explorers + 2 independent verifiers, ~60-90s), and Deep Investigation (progressive iteration with a persistent vault, ~3-60min). Output is confidence-tagged: [HIGH] [MED] [LOW] [CONFLICT].
The Problem
A single AI agent doing research has two failure modes that quietly wreck the result. It hallucinates URLs — confident links that go nowhere, which destroys trust in the whole report. And it answers from one angle, so it parrots whatever the first few search results said and misses conflicts, gaps, and what real people actually thought. Recap journalism is the worst offender: ask "what did fans think of X" and a lone agent hands back promoter copy dressed as consensus. This skill runs several agents in parallel, cross-checks and independently verifies their findings, checks every URL before it ships, and routes sentiment questions to community sources first.
How It Works
Multiple agents work in parallel and their findings get reconciled. Verification runs in three layers at zero added latency: each agent self-verifies its own URLs, a synthesis step cross-checks for conflicts, and dedicated verifier agents (Extensive/Deep) check findings with no access to the explorers' reasoning. Step 0 of every workflow routes sentiment questions to community scrapers before web search, and every URL is verified before delivery — a hallucinated link is a catastrophic failure.
MANDATORY: URL Verification
READ: UrlVerificationProtocol.md - Every URL must be verified before delivery.
Research agents hallucinate URLs. A single broken link is a catastrophic failure.
MANDATORY: Source Routing (Step 0 of every workflow)
READ: SourceRoutingProtocol.md — sentiment-signal detection + scraper-first paths for Reddit / YouTube / X / TikTok.
The rule: web search answers "what was published about X." Community scrapers answer "what people said about X." If the question is about fan sentiment, ratings, reactions, opinions, or what real people thought — route to Reddit (JSON API first, Apify fallback), YouTube comments, and X before spawning Perplexity/Claude/Gemini web-search agents. Recap journalism is the secondary source, not the primary one.
Sentiment signal triggers (run at Step 0 of Quick / Standard / Extensive):
- "what did fans / people / the community think (of|about)"
- "ratings of" / "fan ratings" / "best | worst | favorite (sets | episodes | moments)"
- "reactions to" / "what people are saying"
- "is X any good" / "consensus on"
- Event name + ("last night" | "last weekend" | recent date)
Detection fires → sentiment-mode routing per SourceRoutingProtocol.md. Detection does not fire → standard routing.
Sufficiency Check (Algorithm v6.7.0 Step 0)
Before executing any workflow, verify context sufficiency: do I have what I need to produce a hard-to-vary research artifact, or am I about to speculate? If the question shape and target sources are clear, proceed. If speculating, emit a one-line ambiguity flag and ship best-effort. If clearly insufficient, emit ≤3 questions with proceed override.
Workflow Routing
CRITICAL: For due diligence, company/person background checks, or vetting -> use a dedicated OSINT/entity-investigation skill instead
| Workflow | Trigger | File |
|---|---|---|
| QuickResearch | Quick/minor research; Perplexity API research (1 Perplexity agent, 1 query) | Workflows/QuickResearch.md |
| StandardResearch | Standard research — DEFAULT (3 agents: Claude + Gemini + Perplexity, cross-checked) | Workflows/StandardResearch.md |
| ExtensiveResearch | Extensive research (7 explorers + 2 verifiers = 9 agents) | Workflows/ExtensiveResearch.md |
| DeepInvestigation | Deep investigation / iterative research / map the [X] landscape (progressive deepening, loop-compatible) | Workflows/DeepInvestigation.md |
| DeepVerifiedResearch | Deep verified / fact-checked research — slowest tier, claim-level adversarial verification (see notes below) | Workflows/DeepVerifiedResearch.mjs |
| research.mjs | EXPERIMENTAL deterministic port of Standard + Extensive — do NOT route real research here until a smoke run lands (see Mandatory Trigger note) | Workflows/research.mjs |
| Verify | Verify research findings / cross-check claims / confidence scoring | Workflows/Verify.md |
| ExtractAlpha | Extract alpha / deep analysis / highest-alpha insights | Workflows/ExtractAlpha.md |
| Retrieve | Difficulty accessing content (CAPTCHA, bot detection, blocking) | Workflows/Retrieve.md |
| YoutubeExtraction | YouTube URL extraction (use fabric -y URL immediately) | Workflows/YoutubeExtraction.md |
| WebScraping | Web scraping | Workflows/WebScraping.md |
| ClaudeResearch | Claude WebSearch only (free, no API keys) | Workflows/ClaudeResearch.md |
| InterviewResearch | Interview preparation (Tyler Cowen style) | Workflows/InterviewResearch.md |
| AnalyzeAiTrends | AI trends analysis | Workflows/AnalyzeAiTrends.md |
| Fabric | Use Fabric patterns (242+ specialized prompts) | Workflows/Fabric.md |
| Enhance | Enhance/improve content | Workflows/Enhance.md |
| ExtractKnowledge | Extract knowledge from content | Workflows/ExtractKnowledge.md |
DeepVerifiedResearch notes: run via Workflow({scriptPath: 'skills/Research/Workflows/DeepVerifiedResearch.mjs', args: {question: '...'}}) (pass args as an OBJECT, never a JSON string). Does NOT replace Extensive — it sits below it. Measured ~150-190s vs Extensive's ~60-90s, because claim-level verification needs one extra serial hop (you can't vote on claims until they're extracted). Reach for it only when claims must be bulletproof: each extracted claim is attacked by three skeptics from different lenses (quote-support, contradiction, source-strength), survives only on a quorum of non-refuting votes (all-abstain never survives), then a written synthesis frames the survivors with [HIGH]/[MED]/[LOW]/[CONFLICT] tags and refuted-claim transparency. Dedup, ranking, vote-counting, and the abstention guard run deterministically in the script. research.mjs is the faster sibling and the place multi-vendor diversity lives (Standard/Extensive rosters + URL verify).
Quick Reference
READ: QuickReference.md for detailed examples and mode comparison.
| Trigger | Mode | Speed |
|---|---|---|
| "quick research" | 1 Perplexity agent | ~10-15s |
| "do research" | 3 agents + cross-check | ~30-60s |
| "extensive research" | 7 explorers + 2 verifiers | ~60-90s |
| "deep investigation" | Progressive iteration + verification | ~3-60min |
Verification Architecture
Inspired by Nomad (arXiv:2603.29353). Three layers of verification, zero added latency:
| Layer | What | Where | Cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Self-Verification | Each agent verifies own URLs and tags confidence before returning | All agents | 0s (inside parallel window) |
| Cross-Check | Synthesis step detects conflicts and cross-references findings | Standard, Extensive, Deep | 2-3s (within synthesis) |
| Independent Verification | Dedicated verifier agents with no access to explorer reasoning | Extensive, Deep only | 0s (parallel with explorers) |
Confidence tags in output: [HIGH] [MED] [LOW] [CONFLICT]
See Workflows/Verify.md for full verification protocol.
Integration
Feeds Into
- A blog-authoring skill - Research for blog posts
- A newsletter skill - Research for newsletters
- A social-post skill - Create posts from research
Uses
- be-creative - deep thinking for extract alpha
- OSINT/entity investigation - MANDATORY for company/people comprehensive research
- BrightData MCP - CAPTCHA solving, advanced scraping
- Apify MCP - RAG browser, specialized site scrapers
Deep Investigation Mode
Progressive iterative research that builds a persistent knowledge vault. Works in both single-run (one cycle) and loop mode (Algorithm-driven iterations).
Concept: Broad landscape → discover entities → score importance/effort → deep-dive one at a time → loop until coverage complete.
Domain template packs customize the investigation for specific domains:
Templates/MarketResearch.md— Companies, Products, People, Technologies, Trends, InvestorsTemplates/ThreatLandscape.md— Threat Actors, Campaigns, TTPs, Vulnerabilities, Tools, Defenders- No template? The workflow creates entity categories dynamically from the landscape research.
Example invocation:
"Do a deep investigation of the AI agent market"
→ Loads MarketResearch.md template
→ Iteration 1: Broad landscape + first entity deep-dive
→ Loop mode: Each iteration deep-dives the next highest-priority entity
→ Exit: When all CRITICAL/HIGH entities researched + all categories covered
Artifacts persist at ~/.claude/LIFEOS/MEMORY/RESEARCH/{date}_{topic}/ — the vault survives across sessions.
See Workflows/DeepInvestigation.md for full workflow details.
File Organization
Working files (temporary work artifacts): ~/.claude/LIFEOS/MEMORY/WORK/{current_work}/
- Read
~/.claude/to get thework_dirvalue - All iterative work artifacts go in the current work item directory
- This ties research artifacts to the work item for learning and context
History (permanent): ~/.claude/History/research/YYYY-MM/YYYY-MM-DD_[topic]/
Gotchas
- X/Twitter-URL gate (check before anything else). Machine-checkable precheck: scan the prompt for
x\.com|twitter\.com(e.g.rg -q 'x\.com|twitter\.com'on the request text) BEFORE spawning any research agents. X blocks WebFetch and generic scraping, so generic research agents burn turns and return nothing. When the gate fires, do NOT spawn generic agents at the URL — take the first path below that is actually available, and say in the response which path you took and why (a silent skip is a failure):- A dedicated X/Twitter reader skill, if one is installed — it is the highest-fidelity path.
X_BEARER_TOKENin the environment → read the post via X API v2 directly.- The Apify Twitter actor (
skills/Apify/skills/get-user-tweets.ts) or the BrightData ladder, if either is configured. - None of the above → tell the user plainly that X blocks automated reads here and ask them to paste the post text. Then research the substance normally. Research the rest of the request either way — one unreadable X URL never cancels the whole task.
- Research agents hallucinate URLs. EVERY URL must be verified before delivery. A single broken link is a catastrophic failure.
- Recap journalism is not fan sentiment. When the question is "what did fans think of X" — press articles invent consensus, fabricate timestamps, and parrot promoter copy. Route to Reddit JSON API + X (via the X-URL gate ladder above) + YouTube first per
SourceRoutingProtocol.md. Recap web search is the secondary source for community-sentiment questions, not the primary one. Quick mode can return recap-only and miss the actual fan data — pull Reddit directly rather than waiting to be asked again. Do not repeat. - API first, scraper second, web search last. Never invert. For every platform: try the official API path (Reddit JSON, X API v2 if
X_BEARER_TOKENis set, YouTube Data API v3 ifYOUTUBE_API_KEYis set) before reaching for Apify or BrightData. Scrapers are fallback for when the API path is unavailable, rate-limited, or doesn't expose the data shape needed (e.g., YouTube transcripts — usefabric -yeven when the Data API key is set). The cascade inversion is the recurring failure mode. SeeSourceRoutingProtocol.mdCascade Priority section for the per-platform table. - Reddit JSON API is free and unauth'd — it IS the Tier-1 path for Reddit. Append
.jsonto any thread or listing URL. SetUser-Agent: LifeOS-Research/1.0or Reddit rate-limits the default UA. Apify Reddit scraper is Tier 2 (fallback), not Tier 1. - "research" alone = Standard mode (3 agents + cross-check). Never default to Quick. Users saying "research this" expect thorough results.
- Due diligence, background checks, people lookup → a dedicated OSINT/entity-investigation skill, NOT Research. Research handles general investigation; entity-specific deep investigation belongs to that skill.
- Don't spawn redundant research agents when you already have the answer in context. If prior work in the session already covers the topic, skip agent spawning.
- "extract alpha" routes to ExtractAlpha workflow — not the ExtractWisdom skill. Different things.
- YouTube extraction uses
fabric -y URLdirectly — don't try to scrape YouTube pages with WebFetch. - The inverse signal is signal. When pulling fan sentiment, what people hated is as informative as what they loved. Always include a "disappointments" / "Tier C" section.
DeepVerifiedResearch.mjsis a Workflow-tool script, not a markdown workflow. Invoke it with theWorkflowtool (scriptPath), never by reading it and "doing the steps" — the whole point is that dedup, fetch-budget, vote-counting, and the abstention guard run deterministically in code. Running it spawns many agents + live web calls, so it is opt-in multi-agent: confirm with the principal (or useargs.test: truefor a small smoke run) rather than firing a full ~30–95-agent run unprompted.- Deep-verified voters are native Claude, diverse by lens — NOT by vendor. A 2026-06-02 smoke test proved the external-API LifeOS researchers (Gemini/Perplexity, and the since-removed Grok) do NOT honor the Workflow structured-output contract: schema-forced, they complete without emitting a verdict, so cross-vendor voters all abstained and every claim died 0-0. The fix: voters are native workflow agents (reliable StructuredOutput), made diverse by attack lens (quote-support / contradiction / source-strength). Same lesson applies to the search and fetch stages — keep schema-gated phases on native agents. Multi-vendor diversity belongs in
research.mjs(text-returning researchers), not in the schema-gated verification engine. A claim only survives a quorum of valid votes with fewer than the kill threshold refuting; all-abstain does NOT survive (guards the false-survive bug).
Examples
Example 1: Quick lookup
User: "quick research on Hono SSR middleware patterns"
→ Invokes QuickResearch workflow (1 Claude agent)
→ Returns summary with key patterns and links
→ ~10-15 seconds
Example 2: Standard multi-source research
User: "research the current state of AI agent frameworks"
→ Invokes StandardResearch workflow (3 agents: Claude + Gemini + Perplexity, cross-checked)
→ Cross-references findings, confidence-tags, verifies URLs
→ Returns synthesized report with citations
→ ~30-60 seconds
Example 3: Deep investigation
User: "do a deep investigation of the AI agent market"
→ Invokes DeepInvestigation workflow
→ Broad landscape scan → entity discovery → priority scoring → deep-dives
→ Builds persistent knowledge vault in MEMORY/RESEARCH/
→ Loop-compatible for multi-session investigation
Execution Log
After completing any workflow, append a single JSONL entry:
echo '{"ts":"'$(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)'","skill":"Research","workflow":"WORKFLOW_USED","input":"8_WORD_SUMMARY","status":"ok|error","duration_s":SECONDS}' >> ~/.claude/LIFEOS/MEMORY/SKILLS/execution.jsonl
Replace WORKFLOW_USED with the workflow executed, 8_WORD_SUMMARY with a brief input description, and SECONDS with approximate wall-clock time. Log status: "error" if the workflow failed.
Frequently asked questions about Research
Similar skills
Eyeball
Analyze documents with visual proof.
Account Research
Efficiently gather insights on companies using Common Room data.
Last 30 Days Research
Analyze recent community and social trends in 30 days.
Last 30 Days
Research trending discussions across platforms in the last month.
NotebookLM Research Assistant
Query Google NotebookLM for precise, citation-backed answers.
Customer Research
Streamline multi-source customer inquiries with confidence scoring.
