
Search Strategy
OfficialFreeTransform natural language queries into targeted searches.
Free · Opens the source repo
What Search Strategy does
Search Strategy is designed to enhance enterprise search capabilities by breaking down natural language questions into structured, source-specific queries. When a user poses a question, such as "What did we decide about the API migration timeline?", this skill decomposes it into multiple targeted searches across various connected sources like chat, knowledge bases, and project trackers. Each search is tailored to the specific syntax and capabilities of the source, ensuring that the most relevant information is retrieved efficiently.
The skill employs a systematic approach to query decomposition, first identifying the type of query to apply the appropriate search strategy. It categorizes queries into types such as Decision, Status, Document, and others, allowing it to prioritize sources based on the user's intent. By extracting keywords, entities, and constraints from the original question, Search Strategy crafts precise sub-queries that maximize the chances of finding relevant results.
Once the queries are executed in parallel across all available sources, the results are ranked and deduplicated. The ranking process considers factors such as keyword match, freshness, and authority, ensuring that the most pertinent information is synthesized into a coherent answer for the user. Additionally, the skill includes fallback strategies for handling ambiguous queries or when sources are unavailable, enhancing its robustness in diverse scenarios.
This skill is particularly useful for teams that rely on multiple information sources and need to quickly synthesize insights from them. It is ideal for project managers, developers, and any knowledge workers who require efficient access to information spread across various platforms.
When to use it
Use this skill when you need to extract information from multiple enterprise sources based on natural language questions.
When not to use it
It may not be suitable for simple queries that can be answered from a single source or when the sources are not connected.
What you can build with it
Project Status Inquiry
A project manager asks about the status of a specific project, and the skill retrieves the latest updates from task trackers and chat.
API Migration Decision Retrieval
A developer queries about decisions made on API migration, and the skill synthesizes results from emails and meeting notes.
Policy Information Search
An employee requests information on company policy, and the skill searches through the knowledge base and official documents to provide a comprehensive answer.
How to install Search Strategy
View source1. Install with the skills CLI
npx skills add anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins/search-strategy --agent claude-code2. Or install it manually
Download the skill folder and drop it into ~/.claude/skills/ for all projects, or .claude/skills/ to scope it to one repo. Restart Claude Code so it picks up the new skill.
Anthropic's agentic coding CLI, and the reference implementation of Agent Skills. Drop a skill folder into ~/.claude/skills and Claude Code loads it automatically whenever a task matches the skill's description. Claude Code docs
Inside SKILL.md
Written by anthropicsSearch Strategy
If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.
The core intelligence behind enterprise search. Transforms a single natural language question into parallel, source-specific searches and produces ranked, deduplicated results.
The Goal
Turn this:
"What did we decide about the API migration timeline?"
Into targeted searches across every connected source:
~~chat: "API migration timeline decision" (semantic) + "API migration" in:#engineering after:2025-01-01
~~knowledge base: semantic search "API migration timeline decision"
~~project tracker: text search "API migration" in relevant workspace
Then synthesize the results into a single coherent answer.
Query Decomposition
Step 1: Identify Query Type
Classify the user's question to determine search strategy:
| Query Type | Example | Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Decision | "What did we decide about X?" | Prioritize conversations (~~chat, email), look for conclusion signals |
| Status | "What's the status of Project Y?" | Prioritize recent activity, task trackers, status updates |
| Document | "Where's the spec for Z?" | Prioritize Drive, wiki, shared docs |
| Person | "Who's working on X?" | Search task assignments, message authors, doc collaborators |
| Factual | "What's our policy on X?" | Prioritize wiki, official docs, then confirmatory conversations |
| Temporal | "When did X happen?" | Search with broad date range, look for timestamps |
| Exploratory | "What do we know about X?" | Broad search across all sources, synthesize |
Step 2: Extract Search Components
From the query, extract:
- Keywords: Core terms that must appear in results
- Entities: People, projects, teams, tools (use memory system if available)
- Intent signals: Decision words, status words, temporal markers
- Constraints: Time ranges, source hints, author filters
- Negations: Things to exclude
Step 3: Generate Sub-Queries Per Source
For each available source, create one or more targeted queries:
Prefer semantic search for:
- Conceptual questions ("What do we think about...")
- Questions where exact keywords are unknown
- Exploratory queries
Prefer keyword search for:
- Known terms, project names, acronyms
- Exact phrases the user quoted
- Filter-heavy queries (from:, in:, after:)
Generate multiple query variants when the topic might be referred to differently:
User: "Kubernetes setup"
Queries: "Kubernetes", "k8s", "cluster", "container orchestration"
Source-Specific Query Translation
~~chat
Semantic search (natural language questions):
query: "What is the status of project aurora?"
Keyword search:
query: "project aurora status update"
query: "aurora in:#engineering after:2025-01-15"
query: "from:<@UserID> aurora"
Filter mapping:
| Enterprise filter | ~~chat syntax |
|---|---|
from:sarah | from:sarah or from:<@USERID> |
in:engineering | in:engineering |
after:2025-01-01 | after:2025-01-01 |
before:2025-02-01 | before:2025-02-01 |
type:thread | is:thread |
type:file | has:file |
~~knowledge base (Wiki)
Semantic search — Use for conceptual queries:
descriptive_query: "API migration timeline and decision rationale"
Keyword search — Use for exact terms:
query: "API migration"
query: "\"API migration timeline\"" (exact phrase)
~~project tracker
Task search:
text: "API migration"
workspace: [workspace_id]
completed: false (for status queries)
assignee_any: "me" (for "my tasks" queries)
Filter mapping:
| Enterprise filter | ~~project tracker parameter |
|---|---|
from:sarah | assignee_any or created_by_any |
after:2025-01-01 | modified_on_after: "2025-01-01" |
type:milestone | resource_subtype: "milestone" |
Result Ranking
Relevance Scoring
Score each result on these factors (weighted by query type):
| Factor | Weight (Decision) | Weight (Status) | Weight (Document) | Weight (Factual) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Keyword match | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.3 |
| Freshness | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Authority | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.4 |
| Completeness | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.2 |
Authority Hierarchy
Depends on query type:
For factual/policy questions:
Wiki/Official docs > Shared documents > Email announcements > Chat messages
For "what happened" / decision questions:
Meeting notes > Thread conclusions > Email confirmations > Chat messages
For status questions:
Task tracker > Recent chat > Status docs > Email updates
Handling Ambiguity
When a query is ambiguous, prefer asking one focused clarifying question over guessing:
Ambiguous: "search for the migration"
→ "I found references to a few migrations. Are you looking for:
1. The database migration (Project Phoenix)
2. The cloud migration (AWS → GCP)
3. The email migration (Exchange → O365)"
Only ask for clarification when:
- There are genuinely distinct interpretations that would produce very different results
- The ambiguity would significantly affect which sources to search
Do NOT ask for clarification when:
- The query is clear enough to produce useful results
- Minor ambiguity can be resolved by returning results from multiple interpretations
Fallback Strategies
When a source is unavailable or returns no results:
- Source unavailable: Skip it, search remaining sources, note the gap
- No results from a source: Try broader query terms, remove date filters, try alternate keywords
- All sources return nothing: Suggest query modifications to the user
- Rate limited: Note the limitation, return results from other sources, suggest retrying later
Query Broadening
If initial queries return too few results:
Original: "PostgreSQL migration Q2 timeline decision"
Broader: "PostgreSQL migration"
Broader: "database migration"
Broadest: "migration"
Remove constraints in this order:
- Date filters (search all time)
- Source/location filters
- Less important keywords
- Keep only core entity/topic terms
Parallel Execution
Always execute searches across sources in parallel, never sequentially. The total search time should be roughly equal to the slowest single source, not the sum of all sources.
[User query]
↓ decompose
[~~chat query] [~~email query] [~~cloud storage query] [Wiki query] [~~project tracker query]
↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓
(parallel execution)
↓
[Merge + Rank + Deduplicate]
↓
[Synthesized answer]
Frequently asked questions about Search Strategy
Similar skills
Canva Creator
Streamline your content campaign from brief to HubSpot.
Cowork Plugin Customization
Tailor your Claude Code plugin to fit your organization.
Impediment Prioritization
Rank and prioritize impediments effectively.
Chronicle
Streamline your Copilot session analysis and reporting.
Idea Refine
Transform vague ideas into actionable concepts.
App Store Optimization
Optimize your mobile app's visibility and performance.
