
Vulnerability Scanner
FreeAutomate your security validation with advanced scanning techniques.
Free Β· Opens the source repo
What Vulnerability Scanner does
The Vulnerability Scanner is designed to help developers and security professionals assess their applications against modern security threats. It incorporates principles from the OWASP 2025 guidelines, focusing on critical areas such as supply chain security and attack surface mapping. By utilizing the provided scripts, users can automate the validation of security principles applied in their projects, enhancing their overall security posture.
The core functionality is encapsulated in the security_scan.py script, which allows users to run automated scans on their projects by specifying the project path. This script evaluates various security principles and generates actionable insights based on the findings. Additionally, the included checklists in checklists.md serve as a reference for addressing common vulnerabilities, including those outlined in the OWASP Top 10, which is essential for maintaining a secure development lifecycle.
This skill is particularly useful for teams looking to integrate security into their development processes. The emphasis on a security expert mindset, such as the principles of Zero Trust and Defense in Depth, provides a framework for thinking critically about security at every stage of development. By mapping attack surfaces and prioritizing risks based on established methodologies, users can effectively identify and mitigate potential vulnerabilities before they can be exploited.
Overall, the Vulnerability Scanner is a valuable tool for any developer or security professional aiming to enhance their application's security posture in an increasingly complex threat landscape. It is suitable for both established teams and those just beginning to incorporate security practices into their workflows.
When to use it
Use this tool when you need to assess the security of your software projects against the latest OWASP guidelines and other security best practices.
When not to use it
This is not suitable for real-time attack detection or for environments where immediate threat response is required.
What you can build with it
Automated Security Audits
Integrate the Vulnerability Scanner into your CI/CD pipeline to perform automated security audits on every code push.
Compliance Checks
Use the provided checklists to ensure your application meets compliance standards as outlined by OWASP.
Supply Chain Risk Assessment
Evaluate your dependencies and CI/CD processes to identify potential supply chain vulnerabilities.
How to install Vulnerability Scanner
View source1. Install with the skills CLI
npx skills add vudovn/ag-kit/vulnerability-scanner --agent claude-code2. Or install it manually
Download the skill folder and drop it into ~/.claude/skills/ for all projects, or .claude/skills/ to scope it to one repo. Restart Claude Code so it picks up the new skill.
Anthropic's agentic coding CLI, and the reference implementation of Agent Skills. Drop a skill folder into ~/.claude/skills and Claude Code loads it automatically whenever a task matches the skill's description. Claude Code docs
Inside SKILL.md
Written by vudovnVulnerability Scanner
Think like an attacker, defend like an expert. 2025 threat landscape awareness.
π§ Runtime Scripts
Execute for automated validation:
| Script | Purpose | Usage |
|---|---|---|
scripts/security_scan.py | Validate security principles applied | python scripts/security_scan.py <project_path> |
π Reference Files
| File | Purpose |
|---|---|
| checklists.md | OWASP Top 10, Auth, API, Data protection checklists |
1. Security Expert Mindset
Core Principles
| Principle | Application |
|---|---|
| Assume Breach | Design as if attacker already inside |
| Zero Trust | Never trust, always verify |
| Defense in Depth | Multiple layers, no single point |
| Least Privilege | Minimum required access only |
| Fail Secure | On error, deny access |
Threat Modeling Questions
Before scanning, ask:
- What are we protecting? (Assets)
- Who would attack? (Threat actors)
- How would they attack? (Attack vectors)
- What's the impact? (Business risk)
2. OWASP Top 10:2025
Risk Categories
| Rank | Category | Think About |
|---|---|---|
| A01 | Broken Access Control | Who can access what? IDOR, SSRF |
| A02 | Security Misconfiguration | Defaults, headers, exposed services |
| A03 | Software Supply Chain π | Dependencies, CI/CD, build integrity |
| A04 | Cryptographic Failures | Weak crypto, exposed secrets |
| A05 | Injection | User input β system commands |
| A06 | Insecure Design | Flawed architecture |
| A07 | Authentication Failures | Session, credential management |
| A08 | Integrity Failures | Unsigned updates, tampered data |
| A09 | Logging & Alerting | Blind spots, no monitoring |
| A10 | Exceptional Conditions π | Error handling, fail-open states |
2025 Key Changes
2021 β 2025 Shifts:
βββ SSRF merged into A01 (Access Control)
βββ A02 elevated (Cloud/Container configs)
βββ A03 NEW: Supply Chain (major focus)
βββ A10 NEW: Exceptional Conditions
βββ Focus shift: Root causes > Symptoms
3. Supply Chain Security (A03)
Attack Surface
| Vector | Risk | Question to Ask |
|---|---|---|
| Dependencies | Malicious packages | Do we audit new deps? |
| Lock files | Integrity attacks | Are they committed? |
| Build pipeline | CI/CD compromise | Who can modify? |
| Registry | Typosquatting | Verified sources? |
Defense Principles
- Verify package integrity (checksums)
- Pin versions, audit updates
- Use private registries for critical deps
- Sign and verify artifacts
4. Attack Surface Mapping
What to Map
| Category | Elements |
|---|---|
| Entry Points | APIs, forms, file uploads |
| Data Flows | Input β Process β Output |
| Trust Boundaries | Where auth/authz checked |
| Assets | Secrets, PII, business data |
Prioritization Matrix
Risk = Likelihood Γ Impact
High Impact + High Likelihood β CRITICAL
High Impact + Low Likelihood β HIGH
Low Impact + High Likelihood β MEDIUM
Low Impact + Low Likelihood β LOW
5. Risk Prioritization
CVSS + Context
| Factor | Weight | Question |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS Score | Base severity | How severe is the vuln? |
| EPSS Score | Exploit likelihood | Is it being exploited? |
| Asset Value | Business context | What's at risk? |
| Exposure | Attack surface | Internet-facing? |
Prioritization Decision Tree
Is it actively exploited (EPSS >0.5)?
βββ YES β CRITICAL: Immediate action
βββ NO β Check CVSS
βββ CVSS β₯9.0 β HIGH
βββ CVSS 7.0-8.9 β Consider asset value
βββ CVSS <7.0 β Schedule for later
6. Exceptional Conditions (A10 - New)
Fail-Open vs Fail-Closed
| Scenario | Fail-Open (BAD) | Fail-Closed (GOOD) |
|---|---|---|
| Auth error | Allow access | Deny access |
| Parsing fails | Accept input | Reject input |
| Timeout | Retry forever | Limit + abort |
What to Check
- Exception handlers that catch-all and ignore
- Missing error handling on security operations
- Race conditions in auth/authz
- Resource exhaustion scenarios
7. Scanning Methodology
Phase-Based Approach
1. RECONNAISSANCE
βββ Understand the target
βββ Technology stack
βββ Entry points
βββ Data flows
2. DISCOVERY
βββ Identify potential issues
βββ Configuration review
βββ Dependency analysis
βββ Code pattern search
3. ANALYSIS
βββ Validate and prioritize
βββ False positive elimination
βββ Risk scoring
βββ Attack chain mapping
4. REPORTING
βββ Actionable findings
βββ Clear reproduction steps
βββ Business impact
βββ Remediation guidance
8. Code Pattern Analysis
High-Risk Patterns
| Pattern | Risk | Look For |
|---|---|---|
| String concat in queries | Injection | "SELECT * FROM " + user_input |
| Dynamic code execution | RCE | eval(), exec(), Function() |
| Unsafe deserialization | RCE | pickle.loads(), unserialize() |
| Path manipulation | Traversal | User input in file paths |
| Disabled security | Various | verify=False, --insecure |
Secret Patterns
| Type | Indicators |
|---|---|
| API Keys | api_key, apikey, high entropy |
| Tokens | token, bearer, jwt |
| Credentials | password, secret, key |
| Cloud | AWS_, AZURE_, GCP_ prefixes |
9. Cloud Security Considerations
Shared Responsibility
| Layer | You Own | Provider Owns |
|---|---|---|
| Data | β | β |
| Application | β | β |
| OS/Runtime | Depends | Depends |
| Infrastructure | β | β |
Cloud-Specific Checks
- IAM: Least privilege applied?
- Storage: Public buckets?
- Network: Security groups tightened?
- Secrets: Using secrets manager?
10. Anti-Patterns
| β Don't | β Do |
|---|---|
| Scan without understanding | Map attack surface first |
| Alert on every CVE | Prioritize by exploitability + asset |
| Ignore false positives | Maintain verified baseline |
| Fix symptoms only | Address root causes |
| Scan once before deploy | Continuous scanning |
| Trust third-party deps blindly | Verify integrity, audit code |
11. Reporting Principles
Finding Structure
Each finding should answer:
- What? - Clear vulnerability description
- Where? - Exact location (file, line, endpoint)
- Why? - Root cause explanation
- Impact? - Business consequence
- How to fix? - Specific remediation
Severity Classification
| Severity | Criteria |
|---|---|
| Critical | RCE, auth bypass, mass data exposure |
| High | Data exposure, privilege escalation |
| Medium | Limited scope, requires conditions |
| Low | Informational, best practice |
Remember: Vulnerability scanning finds issues. Expert thinking prioritizes what matters. Always ask: "What would an attacker do with this?"
Frequently asked questions about Vulnerability Scanner
Similar skills
GitHub Actions Hardening
Enhance the security of your GitHub Actions workflows.
Sensitive Logging Audit
Audit and fix sensitive data exposure in Python logging.
Android App Static Analysis
Automate security assessments of Android apps with MobSF.
Integrating DAST with OWASP ZAP
Seamlessly integrate dynamic security testing into CI/CD pipelines.
Implementing Runtime Security with Tetragon
Enhance Kubernetes security with eBPF-based observability.
Implementing Mobile Application Management
Secure enterprise data on mobile devices with app-level controls.
