New to Claude Skills? Learn how to install them →

Daaronontheweb on GitHub

Dependency Injection Patterns

Free

Streamline service registrations in ASP.NET Core.

Get this skill

Free · Opens the source repo

What Dependency Injection Patterns does

The Dependency Injection Patterns skill provides a structured approach to organizing service registrations in ASP.NET Core applications. By utilizing extension methods on the IServiceCollection interface, developers can group related services into composable methods, resulting in cleaner and more maintainable Program.cs files. This organization not only enhances readability but also allows for easier testing and integration of services across different environments.

When service registrations are not properly organized, the Program.cs file can quickly become unwieldy, making it difficult to locate specific registrations and leading to merge conflicts. This skill addresses that issue by promoting the use of extension methods that encapsulate service configurations, enabling developers to create reusable configurations that can be shared between production and testing scenarios. This approach not only improves the structure of the code but also adheres to best practices in software design.

The skill is particularly beneficial for developers working on large ASP.NET Core applications or those designing libraries that leverage Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection. By implementing the extension method pattern, developers can maintain clear boundaries between different service groups, making their codebase easier to navigate and understand. Additionally, the skill supports advanced patterns for testing and integration with frameworks like Akka.NET, providing a comprehensive solution for managing dependencies in complex applications.

When to use it

Use this skill when organizing service registrations in ASP.NET Core applications, especially when aiming to maintain a clean and manageable Program.cs file.

When not to use it

This skill may not be suitable for small applications with minimal service registrations, where the overhead of creating extension methods could outweigh the benefits.

What you can build with it

Organizing Large Applications

In large ASP.NET Core applications, this skill helps maintain a clean Program.cs by grouping related service registrations.

Reusable Configurations for Testing

When writing tests, this skill allows developers to reuse service configurations, simplifying test setup.

Integrating with Akka.NET

For applications using Akka.NET, this skill provides a structured way to manage actor configurations alongside service registrations.

How to install Dependency Injection Patterns

View source

1. Install with the skills CLI

npx skills add aaronontheweb/dotnet-skills/microsoft-extensions-dependency-injection --agent claude-code

2. Or install it manually

Download the skill folder and drop it into ~/.claude/skills/ for all projects, or .claude/skills/ to scope it to one repo. Restart Claude Code so it picks up the new skill.

Anthropic's agentic coding CLI, and the reference implementation of Agent Skills. Drop a skill folder into ~/.claude/skills and Claude Code loads it automatically whenever a task matches the skill's description. Claude Code docs

Inside SKILL.md

Written by aaronontheweb

Dependency Injection Patterns

When to Use This Skill

Use this skill when:

  • Organizing service registrations in ASP.NET Core applications
  • Avoiding massive Program.cs/Startup.cs files with hundreds of registrations
  • Making service configuration reusable between production and tests
  • Designing libraries that integrate with Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection

Reference Files

  • advanced-patterns.md: Testing with DI extensions, Akka.NET actor scope management, conditional/factory/keyed registration patterns

The Problem

Without organization, Program.cs becomes unmanageable:

// BAD: 200+ lines of unorganized registrations
var builder = WebApplication.CreateBuilder(args);

builder.Services.AddScoped<IUserRepository, UserRepository>();
builder.Services.AddScoped<IOrderRepository, OrderRepository>();
builder.Services.AddScoped<IProductRepository, ProductRepository>();
builder.Services.AddScoped<IUserService, UserService>();
// ... 150 more lines ...

Problems: hard to find related registrations, no clear boundaries, can't reuse in tests, merge conflicts.


The Solution: Extension Method Composition

Group related registrations into extension methods:

// GOOD: Clean, composable Program.cs
var builder = WebApplication.CreateBuilder(args);

builder.Services
    .AddUserServices()
    .AddOrderServices()
    .AddEmailServices()
    .AddPaymentServices()
    .AddValidators();

var app = builder.Build();

Extension Method Pattern

Basic Structure

namespace MyApp.Users;

public static class UserServiceCollectionExtensions
{
    public static IServiceCollection AddUserServices(this IServiceCollection services)
    {
        services.AddScoped<IUserRepository, UserRepository>();
        services.AddScoped<IUserReadStore, UserReadStore>();
        services.AddScoped<IUserWriteStore, UserWriteStore>();
        services.AddScoped<IUserService, UserService>();
        services.AddScoped<IUserValidationService, UserValidationService>();

        return services;
    }
}

With Configuration

namespace MyApp.Email;

public static class EmailServiceCollectionExtensions
{
    public static IServiceCollection AddEmailServices(
        this IServiceCollection services,
        string configSectionName = "EmailSettings")
    {
        services.AddOptions<EmailOptions>()
            .BindConfiguration(configSectionName)
            .ValidateDataAnnotations()
            .ValidateOnStart();

        services.AddSingleton<IMjmlTemplateRenderer, MjmlTemplateRenderer>();
        services.AddSingleton<IEmailLinkGenerator, EmailLinkGenerator>();
        services.AddScoped<IUserEmailComposer, UserEmailComposer>();
        services.AddScoped<IEmailSender, SmtpEmailSender>();

        return services;
    }
}

File Organization

Place extension methods near the services they register:

src/
  MyApp.Api/
    Program.cs                    # Composes all Add* methods
  MyApp.Users/
    Services/
      UserService.cs
    UserServiceCollectionExtensions.cs   # AddUserServices()
  MyApp.Orders/
    OrderServiceCollectionExtensions.cs  # AddOrderServices()
  MyApp.Email/
    EmailServiceCollectionExtensions.cs  # AddEmailServices()

Convention: {Feature}ServiceCollectionExtensions.cs next to the feature's services.


Naming Conventions

PatternUse For
Add{Feature}Services()General feature registration
Add{Feature}()Short form when unambiguous
Configure{Feature}()When primarily setting options
Use{Feature}()Middleware (on IApplicationBuilder)

Testing Benefits

The Add* pattern lets you reuse production configuration in tests and only override what's different. Works with WebApplicationFactory, Akka.Hosting.TestKit, and standalone ServiceCollection.

See advanced-patterns.md for complete testing examples.


Layered Extensions

For larger applications, compose extensions hierarchically:

public static class AppServiceCollectionExtensions
{
    public static IServiceCollection AddAppServices(this IServiceCollection services)
    {
        return services
            .AddDomainServices()
            .AddInfrastructureServices()
            .AddApiServices();
    }
}

public static class DomainServiceCollectionExtensions
{
    public static IServiceCollection AddDomainServices(this IServiceCollection services)
    {
        return services
            .AddUserServices()
            .AddOrderServices()
            .AddProductServices();
    }
}

Akka.Hosting Integration

The same pattern works for Akka.NET actor configuration:

public static class OrderActorExtensions
{
    public static AkkaConfigurationBuilder AddOrderActors(
        this AkkaConfigurationBuilder builder)
    {
        return builder
            .WithActors((system, registry, resolver) =>
            {
                var orderProps = resolver.Props<OrderActor>();
                var orderRef = system.ActorOf(orderProps, "orders");
                registry.Register<OrderActor>(orderRef);
            });
    }
}

// Usage in Program.cs
builder.Services.AddAkka("MySystem", (builder, sp) =>
{
    builder
        .AddOrderActors()
        .AddInventoryActors()
        .AddNotificationActors();
});

See akka-hosting-actor-patterns skill for complete Akka.Hosting patterns.


Anti-Patterns

Don't: Register Everything in Program.cs

// BAD: Massive Program.cs with 200+ lines of registrations

Don't: Create Overly Generic Extensions

// BAD: Too vague, doesn't communicate what's registered
public static IServiceCollection AddServices(this IServiceCollection services) { ... }

Don't: Hide Important Configuration

// BAD: Buried settings
public static IServiceCollection AddDatabase(this IServiceCollection services)
{
    services.AddDbContext<AppDbContext>(options =>
        options.UseSqlServer("hardcoded-connection-string"));  // Hidden!
}

// GOOD: Accept configuration explicitly
public static IServiceCollection AddDatabase(
    this IServiceCollection services,
    string connectionString)
{
    services.AddDbContext<AppDbContext>(options =>
        options.UseSqlServer(connectionString));
}

Best Practices Summary

PracticeBenefit
Group related services into Add* methodsClean Program.cs, clear boundaries
Place extensions near the services they registerEasy to find and maintain
Return IServiceCollection for chainingFluent API
Accept configuration parametersFlexibility
Use consistent naming (Add{Feature}Services)Discoverability
Test by reusing production extensionsConfidence, less duplication

Lifetime Management

LifetimeUse WhenExamples
SingletonStateless, thread-safe, expensive to createConfiguration, HttpClient factories, caches
ScopedStateful per-request, database contextsDbContext, repositories, user context
TransientLightweight, stateful, cheap to createValidators, short-lived helpers
// SINGLETON: Stateless services, shared safely
services.AddSingleton<IMjmlTemplateRenderer, MjmlTemplateRenderer>();

// SCOPED: Database access, per-request state
services.AddScoped<IUserRepository, UserRepository>();

// TRANSIENT: Cheap, short-lived
services.AddTransient<CreateUserRequestValidator>();

Scoped services require a scope. ASP.NET Core creates one per HTTP request. In background services and actors, create scopes manually.

See advanced-patterns.md for actor scope management patterns.


Common Mistakes

Injecting Scoped into Singleton

// BAD: Singleton captures scoped service - stale DbContext!
public class CacheService  // Registered as Singleton
{
    private readonly IUserRepository _repo;  // Scoped - captured at startup!
}

// GOOD: Inject IServiceProvider, create scope per operation
public class CacheService
{
    private readonly IServiceProvider _serviceProvider;

    public async Task<User> GetUserAsync(string id)
    {
        using var scope = _serviceProvider.CreateScope();
        var repo = scope.ServiceProvider.GetRequiredService<IUserRepository>();
        return await repo.GetByIdAsync(id);
    }
}

No Scope in Background Work

// BAD: No scope for scoped services
public class BadBackgroundService : BackgroundService
{
    private readonly IOrderService _orderService;  // Scoped - will throw!
}

// GOOD: Create scope for each unit of work
public class GoodBackgroundService : BackgroundService
{
    private readonly IServiceScopeFactory _scopeFactory;

    protected override async Task ExecuteAsync(CancellationToken ct)
    {
        using var scope = _scopeFactory.CreateScope();
        var orderService = scope.ServiceProvider.GetRequiredService<IOrderService>();
        // ...
    }
}

Resources

Frequently asked questions about Dependency Injection Patterns

Similar skills