
Domain Identification Grouping
FreeOrganize components into logical business domains.
Free · Opens the source repo
What Domain Identification Grouping does
The Domain Identification and Grouping skill is designed to assist developers in organizing architectural components into logical business domains, which is essential for planning a service-based architecture. By grouping components according to their responsibilities and relationships, this skill provides a structured approach to understanding how different parts of a system interact and can be effectively managed as part of a domain-driven design.
To utilize this skill, users can request specific analyses of their codebase, such as grouping components into domains or identifying which domain a particular component belongs to. The skill analyzes component functionalities and relationships, creating domain diagrams and suggesting namespace refactoring to ensure that components are logically aligned with their respective domains. This is particularly useful when transitioning to a service-oriented architecture, as it helps clarify the boundaries and responsibilities of each domain.
The skill is beneficial for teams looking to improve their architecture by ensuring that components are grouped logically, thereby enhancing maintainability and scalability. It is particularly relevant in scenarios where there is a need to prepare for domain-driven design implementation or when analyzing component relationships to align them with business capabilities. By collaborating with business stakeholders, developers can validate domain assignments and ensure that the architecture reflects the actual business structure.
However, it is important to note that this skill is not intended for identifying new domains from scratch or for analyzing coupling between components. For those purposes, other specialized skills should be employed. The focus of this skill is strictly on organizing existing components into coherent business domains, making it a valuable tool for teams engaged in architectural planning and refactoring.
When to use it
Use this skill when planning service-based architecture or when you need to group existing components into logical domains for better organization and management.
When not to use it
This skill is not suitable for identifying new domains or analyzing component coupling; for those tasks, consider using domain-analysis or coupling-analysis skills instead.
What you can build with it
Planning Service Migration
Use this skill to group components logically before migrating to a service-based architecture, ensuring clarity in domain responsibilities.
Refactoring for Domain Alignment
When refactoring code, apply this skill to suggest namespace changes that align components with their respective business domains.
Validating Domain Assignments
Collaborate with stakeholders to validate domain assignments based on the analysis provided by this skill, ensuring alignment with business needs.
How to install Domain Identification Grouping
View source1. Install with the skills CLI
npx skills add tech-leads-club/agent-skills/domain-identification-grouping --agent claude-code2. Or install it manually
Download the skill folder and drop it into ~/.claude/skills/ for all projects, or .claude/skills/ to scope it to one repo. Restart Claude Code so it picks up the new skill.
Anthropic's agentic coding CLI, and the reference implementation of Agent Skills. Drop a skill folder into ~/.claude/skills and Claude Code loads it automatically whenever a task matches the skill's description. Claude Code docs
Inside SKILL.md
Written by tech-leads-clubDomain Identification and Grouping
This skill groups architectural components into logical domains (business areas) to prepare for creating domain services in a service-based architecture.
How to Use
Quick Start
Request analysis of your codebase:
- "Group components into logical domains"
- "Identify component domains for service-based architecture"
- "Create domain groupings from components"
- "Analyze which components belong to which domains"
Usage Examples
Example 1: Domain Identification
User: "Group components into logical domains"
The skill will:
1. Analyze component responsibilities and relationships
2. Identify business domains based on functionality
3. Group components into domains
4. Create domain diagrams
5. Suggest namespace refactoring for domain alignment
Example 2: Domain Analysis
User: "Which domain should the billing components belong to?"
The skill will:
1. Analyze billing component functionality
2. Check relationships with other components
3. Identify appropriate domain (e.g., Customer or Financial)
4. Recommend domain assignment
Example 3: Domain Refactoring
User: "What namespace refactoring is needed to align components with domains?"
The skill will:
1. Compare current component namespaces to identified domains
2. Identify misaligned components
3. Suggest namespace changes
4. Create refactoring plan
Step-by-Step Process
- Identify Domains: Analyze business capabilities and component relationships
- Group Components: Assign components to appropriate domains
- Validate Groupings: Ensure components fit well in their domains
- Refactor Namespaces: Align component namespaces with domains
- Create Domain Map: Visualize domain structure and component groupings
When to Use
Apply this skill when:
- After identifying, sizing, and analyzing component dependencies
- Before creating domain services (Pattern 6)
- When planning service-based architecture migration
- Analyzing component relationships and business alignment
- Preparing for domain-driven design implementation
- Grouping components for better organization
Core Concepts
Domain Definition
A domain is a logical grouping of components that:
- Represents a distinct business capability or area
- Contains related components that work together
- Has clear boundaries and responsibilities
- Can become a domain service in service-based architecture
Examples:
- Customer Domain: Customer profile, billing, support contracts
- Ticketing Domain: Ticket creation, assignment, routing, completion
- Reporting Domain: Ticket reports, expert reports, financial reports
Component Domain Relationship
One-to-Many: A single domain contains multiple components
Domain: Customer
├── Component: Customer Profile
├── Component: Billing Payment
├── Component: Billing History
└── Component: Support Contract
Domain Manifestation
Domains are physically manifested through namespace structure:
Before Domain Alignment:
services/billing/payment
services/billing/history
services/customer/profile
services/supportcontract
After Domain Alignment:
services/customer/billing/payment
services/customer/billing/history
services/customer/profile
services/customer/supportcontract
Notice how all customer-related functionality is grouped under .customer domain.
Analysis Process
Phase 1: Identify Business Domains
Analyze the codebase to identify distinct business domains:
-
Examine Component Responsibilities
- Read component names and descriptions
- Understand what each component does
- Identify business capabilities
-
Look for Business Language
- Group components by business vocabulary
- Example: "billing", "payment", "invoice" → Financial domain
- Example: "customer", "profile", "contract" → Customer domain
-
Identify Domain Boundaries
- Where do business concepts change?
- What are the distinct business areas?
- How do components relate to business capabilities?
-
Collaborate with Business Stakeholders
- Validate domain identification with product owners
- Ensure domains align with business understanding
- Get feedback on domain boundaries
Example Domain Identification:
## Identified Domains
1. **Ticketing Domain** (ss.ticket)
- Ticket creation, assignment, routing, completion
- Customer surveys
- Knowledge base
2. **Customer Domain** (ss.customer)
- Customer profile
- Billing and payment
- Support contracts
3. **Reporting Domain** (ss.reporting)
- Ticket reports
- Expert reports
- Financial reports
4. **Admin Domain** (ss.admin)
- User maintenance
- Expert profile management
5. **Shared Domain** (ss.shared)
- Login
- Notification
Phase 2: Group Components into Domains
Assign each component to an appropriate domain:
-
Analyze Component Functionality
- What business capability does it support?
- What domain vocabulary does it use?
- What other components does it relate to?
-
Check Component Relationships
- Which components are frequently used together?
- What are the dependencies between components?
- Do components share data or workflows?
-
Assign to Domain
- Place component in domain that best fits its functionality
- Ensure component aligns with domain's business language
- Verify component relationships support domain grouping
-
Handle Edge Cases
- Components that don't fit clearly: Analyze more deeply
- Components that fit multiple domains: Choose primary domain
- Shared components: May belong to Shared domain
Example Component Grouping:
## Component Domain Assignment
### Ticketing Domain (ss.ticket)
- Ticket Shared (ss.ticket.shared)
- Ticket Maintenance (ss.ticket.maintenance)
- Ticket Completion (ss.ticket.completion)
- Ticket Assign (ss.ticket.assign)
- Ticket Route (ss.ticket.route)
- KB Maintenance (ss.ticket.kb.maintenance)
- KB Search (ss.ticket.kb.search)
- Survey (ss.ticket.survey)
### Customer Domain (ss.customer)
- Customer Profile (ss.customer.profile)
- Billing Payment (ss.customer.billing.payment)
- Billing History (ss.customer.billing.history)
- Support Contract (ss.customer.supportcontract)
### Reporting Domain (ss.reporting)
- Reporting Shared (ss.reporting.shared)
- Ticket Reports (ss.reporting.tickets)
- Expert Reports (ss.reporting.experts)
- Financial Reports (ss.reporting.financial)
Phase 3: Validate Domain Groupings
Ensure components fit well in their assigned domains:
-
Check Cohesion
- Do components in domain share business language?
- Are components frequently used together?
- Do components have direct relationships?
-
Verify Boundaries
- Are domain boundaries clear?
- Do components belong to only one domain?
- Are there components that don't fit anywhere?
-
Assess Completeness
- Are all components assigned to a domain?
- Are domains cohesive and well-formed?
- Do domains represent distinct business capabilities?
-
Get Stakeholder Validation
- Review domain groupings with product owners
- Ensure domains align with business understanding
- Get feedback on domain boundaries
Validation Checklist:
- All components assigned to a domain
- Domains have clear boundaries
- Components fit well in their domains
- Domains represent distinct business capabilities
- Stakeholders validate domain groupings
Phase 4: Refactor Namespaces for Domain Alignment
Align component namespaces with identified domains:
-
Compare Current vs Target Namespaces
- Current:
services/billing/payment - Target:
services/customer/billing/payment - Change: Add
.customerdomain node
- Current:
-
Identify Refactoring Needed
- Which components need namespace changes?
- What domain nodes need to be added?
- Are there components already aligned?
-
Create Refactoring Plan
- List components needing namespace changes
- Specify target namespace for each
- Prioritize refactoring work
-
Execute Refactoring
- Update component namespaces
- Update imports/references
- Verify all references updated
Example Namespace Refactoring:
## Namespace Refactoring Plan
### Customer Domain Alignment
| Component | Current Namespace | Target Namespace | Action |
| ---------------- | ------------------- | --------------------------- | ------------- |
| Billing Payment | ss.billing.payment | ss.customer.billing.payment | Add .customer |
| Billing History | ss.billing.history | ss.customer.billing.history | Add .customer |
| Customer Profile | ss.customer.profile | ss.customer.profile | No change |
| Support Contract | ss.supportcontract | ss.customer.supportcontract | Add .customer |
### Ticketing Domain Alignment
| Component | Current Namespace | Target Namespace | Action |
| -------------- | ----------------- | ------------------------ | ----------- |
| KB Maintenance | ss.kb.maintenance | ss.ticket.kb.maintenance | Add .ticket |
| KB Search | ss.kb.search | ss.ticket.kb.search | Add .ticket |
| Survey | ss.survey | ss.ticket.survey | Add .ticket |
Phase 5: Create Domain Map
Visualize domain structure and component groupings:
-
Create Domain Diagram
- Show domains as boxes
- Show components within each domain
- Show relationships between domains
-
Document Domain Structure
- List domains and their components
- Describe domain responsibilities
- Note domain boundaries
-
Create Domain Inventory
- Table of domains and components
- Component counts per domain
- Size metrics per domain
Example Domain Map:
## Domain Map
┌─────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Ticketing Domain (ss.ticket) │ ├─────────────────────────────────────┤ │ • Ticket Shared │ │ • Ticket Maintenance │ │ • Ticket Completion │ │ • Ticket Assign │ │ • Ticket Route │ │ • KB Maintenance │ │ • KB Search │ │ • Survey │ └─────────────────────────────────────┘ │ │ uses ▼ ┌─────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Customer Domain (ss.customer) │ ├─────────────────────────────────────┤ │ • Customer Profile │ │ • Billing Payment │ │ • Billing History │ │ • Support Contract │ └─────────────────────────────────────┘
## Output Format
### Domain Identification Report
```markdown
## Domain Identification
### Domain: Customer (ss.customer)
**Business Capability**: Manages customer relationships, billing, and support contracts
**Components**:
- Customer Profile (ss.customer.profile)
- Billing Payment (ss.customer.billing.payment)
- Billing History (ss.customer.billing.history)
- Support Contract (ss.customer.supportcontract)
**Component Count**: 4
**Total Size**: ~15,000 statements (18% of codebase)
**Domain Cohesion**: ✅ High
- Components share customer-related vocabulary
- Components frequently used together
- Direct relationships between components
**Boundaries**:
- Clear separation from Ticketing domain
- Clear separation from Reporting domain
- Shared components (Notification) used by all domains
Component Domain Assignment Table
## Component Domain Assignment
| Component | Current Namespace | Assigned Domain | Target Namespace |
| ------------------ | --------------------- | --------------- | --------------------------------- |
| Customer Profile | ss.customer.profile | Customer | ss.customer.profile (no change) |
| Billing Payment | ss.billing.payment | Customer | ss.customer.billing.payment |
| Ticket Maintenance | ss.ticket.maintenance | Ticketing | ss.ticket.maintenance (no change) |
| KB Maintenance | ss.kb.maintenance | Ticketing | ss.ticket.kb.maintenance |
| Reporting Shared | ss.reporting.shared | Reporting | ss.reporting.shared (no change) |
Namespace Refactoring Plan
## Namespace Refactoring Plan
### Priority: High
**Customer Domain Alignment**
**Components to Refactor**:
1. Billing Payment: `ss.billing.payment` → `ss.customer.billing.payment`
2. Billing History: `ss.billing.history` → `ss.customer.billing.history`
3. Support Contract: `ss.supportcontract` → `ss.customer.supportcontract`
**Steps**:
1. Update namespace declarations in source files
2. Update import statements in dependent components
3. Update directory structure
4. Run tests to verify changes
5. Update documentation
**Expected Impact**:
- All customer-related components aligned under `.customer` domain
- Clearer domain boundaries
- Easier to identify domain components
Domain Map Visualization
## Domain Map
### Domain Structure
Customer Domain (ss.customer) ├── Customer Profile ├── Billing Payment ├── Billing History └── Support Contract
Ticketing Domain (ss.ticket) ├── Ticket Shared ├── Ticket Maintenance ├── Ticket Completion ├── Ticket Assign ├── Ticket Route ├── KB Maintenance ├── KB Search └── Survey
Reporting Domain (ss.reporting) ├── Reporting Shared ├── Ticket Reports ├── Expert Reports └── Financial Reports
Admin Domain (ss.admin) ├── User Maintenance └── Expert Profile
Shared Domain (ss.shared) ├── Login └── Notification
### Domain Relationships
Ticketing Domain │ uses ├─→ Shared Domain (Login, Notification) └─→ Customer Domain (Customer Profile)
Customer Domain │ uses └─→ Shared Domain (Login, Notification)
Reporting Domain │ uses ├─→ Ticketing Domain (Ticket data) ├─→ Customer Domain (Customer data) └─→ Shared Domain (Login)
Analysis Checklist
Domain Identification:
- Analyzed component responsibilities
- Identified business capabilities
- Identified distinct business domains
- Validated domains with stakeholders
Component Grouping:
- Assigned each component to a domain
- Analyzed component relationships
- Ensured components fit domain vocabulary
- Handled edge cases (shared components, unclear assignments)
Domain Validation:
- Checked cohesion within domains
- Verified domain boundaries are clear
- Ensured all components assigned
- Validated with stakeholders
Namespace Refactoring:
- Compared current vs target namespaces
- Identified components needing refactoring
- Created refactoring plan
- Prioritized refactoring work
Domain Mapping:
- Created domain diagram
- Documented domain structure
- Created domain inventory table
- Documented domain relationships
Implementation Notes
For Node.js/Express Applications
Domains typically organized in services/ directory:
services/
├── customer/ ← Customer Domain
│ ├── profile/
│ ├── billing/
│ │ ├── payment/
│ │ └── history/
│ └── supportcontract/
├── ticket/ ← Ticketing Domain
│ ├── shared/
│ ├── maintenance/
│ ├── assign/
│ └── route/
└── reporting/ ← Reporting Domain
├── shared/
├── tickets/
└── experts/
For Java Applications
Domains identified by package structure:
com.company.customer ← Customer Domain
├── profile
├── billing
│ ├── payment
│ └── history
└── supportcontract
com.company.ticket ← Ticketing Domain
├── shared
├── maintenance
├── assign
└── route
Domain Identification Strategies
Strategy 1: Business Capability Analysis
- Identify what business capabilities the system provides
- Group components by capability
- Example: "Customer Management" capability → Customer Domain
Strategy 2: Vocabulary Analysis
- Identify business vocabulary used by components
- Group components sharing same vocabulary
- Example: Components using "billing", "payment", "invoice" → Financial Domain
Strategy 3: Relationship Analysis
- Identify components frequently used together
- Group components with strong relationships
- Example: Components that share data/workflows → Same Domain
Strategy 4: Stakeholder Collaboration
- Work with product owners/business analysts
- Use their understanding of business areas
- Validate domain boundaries with them
Fitness Functions
After creating domains, create automated checks:
Domain Namespace Governance
// Ensure components belong to correct domain
function validateDomainNamespaces(components, domainRules) {
const violations = []
components.forEach((comp) => {
const domain = identifyDomain(comp.namespace)
const expectedDomain = domainRules[comp.name]
if (domain !== expectedDomain) {
violations.push({
component: comp.name,
currentDomain: domain,
expectedDomain: expectedDomain,
namespace: comp.namespace,
})
}
})
return violations
}
Domain Boundary Enforcement
// Prevent components from accessing other domains directly
function enforceDomainBoundaries(components) {
const violations = []
components.forEach((comp) => {
comp.imports.forEach((imp) => {
const importedDomain = identifyDomain(imp)
const componentDomain = identifyDomain(comp.namespace)
if (importedDomain !== componentDomain && importedDomain !== 'shared') {
violations.push({
component: comp.name,
domain: componentDomain,
importsFrom: imp,
importedDomain: importedDomain,
issue: 'Cross-domain direct dependency',
})
}
})
})
return violations
}
Best Practices
Do's ✅
- Collaborate with business stakeholders to identify domains
- Group components by business capability, not technical layers
- Ensure domains represent distinct business areas
- Validate domain boundaries with stakeholders
- Refactor namespaces to align with domains
- Create clear domain documentation
- Use business language in domain names
Don'ts ❌
- Don't create domains based on technical layers (services, controllers, models)
- Don't force components into domains where they don't fit
- Don't skip stakeholder validation
- Don't create too many small domains (aim for 3-7 domains)
- Don't create domains that are too large (monolithic domains)
- Don't ignore components that don't fit (analyze why)
- Don't skip namespace refactoring (critical for clarity)
Common Domain Patterns
Typical Domains in Business Applications
- Customer Domain: Customer management, profiles, relationships
- Product Domain: Product catalog, inventory, pricing
- Order Domain: Order processing, fulfillment, shipping
- Billing Domain: Invoicing, payments, financial transactions
- Reporting Domain: Reports, analytics, dashboards
- Admin Domain: User management, system configuration
- Shared Domain: Common functionality (login, notification, utilities)
Domain Size Guidelines
- Small Domain: 2-4 components
- Medium Domain: 5-8 components
- Large Domain: 9-15 components
- Too Large: >15 components (consider splitting)
Next Steps
After creating component domains:
- Apply Create Domain Services Pattern - Extract domains to separate services
- Plan Service Extraction - Create migration plan for domain services
- Implement Domain Services - Move domains to separately deployed services
- Monitor Domain Boundaries - Use fitness functions to enforce boundaries
Notes
- Domains should represent business capabilities, not technical layers
- Domain identification requires collaboration with business stakeholders
- Namespace refactoring is critical for domain clarity
- Domains prepare the codebase for service-based architecture
- Well-formed domains make service extraction easier
- Domain boundaries should be clear and well-documented
Frequently asked questions about Domain Identification Grouping
Similar skills
React Composition Patterns
Streamline your React component architecture with proven patterns.
Pester Should Migration
Easily convert Pester v5 assertions to v6 syntax.
Radix to Base UI Migration
Seamlessly migrate React components from Radix UI to Base UI.
Migrate Next.js to Vinext
Seamlessly transition your Next.js projects to Vinext.
WinUI 3 Migration Guide
Streamline your UWP to WinUI 3 migration process.
Refactor
Enhance code maintainability without altering behavior.
