
Test-Driven Development Workflow
FreeEnforce TDD principles for robust code development.
Free · Opens the source repo
What Test-Driven Development Workflow does
The Test-Driven Development (TDD) Workflow skill is designed to help developers adhere to TDD principles throughout the software development lifecycle. It emphasizes writing tests before code, ensuring that all new features, bug fixes, and refactoring efforts are guided by comprehensive test cases. This skill is particularly valuable for teams looking to maintain high code quality and reliability by enforcing a minimum of 80% test coverage across unit, integration, and end-to-end tests.
The workflow begins with identifying user journeys, which serve as the foundation for generating test cases. By writing tests first, developers can clarify requirements and expected behavior, leading to more focused and effective implementations. The skill provides a structured approach to testing, covering various types such as unit tests for individual functions, integration tests for API interactions, and end-to-end tests for critical user flows. This comprehensive testing strategy ensures that all edge cases and error scenarios are accounted for, promoting a robust codebase.
For developers and teams who want to integrate TDD into their practices, this skill streamlines the process by providing clear steps and guidelines. It includes commands to detect the appropriate test runner for the project, ensuring that tests are executed correctly based on the project's configuration. The structured workflow not only aids in maintaining code quality but also fosters a culture of testing within development teams, ultimately leading to more maintainable and reliable software products.
When to use it
Use this skill when developing new features, fixing bugs, or refactoring code to ensure comprehensive test coverage and adherence to TDD principles.
When not to use it
This skill may not be suitable for projects where testing is not prioritized or for quick prototypes where speed is more critical than code quality.
What you can build with it
Developing New Features
When starting a new feature, use this skill to ensure that tests are written first, guiding the implementation and maintaining high code quality.
Fixing Bugs
Leverage the TDD workflow to write tests that replicate the bug, ensuring that it is resolved and does not reoccur in the future.
Refactoring Code
Use the skill to maintain test coverage while improving code quality, ensuring that existing functionality remains intact during refactoring.
How to install Test-Driven Development Workflow
View source1. Install with the skills CLI
npx skills add affaan-m/ecc/tdd-workflow --agent claude-code2. Or install it manually
Download the skill folder and drop it into ~/.claude/skills/ for all projects, or .claude/skills/ to scope it to one repo. Restart Claude Code so it picks up the new skill.
Anthropic's agentic coding CLI, and the reference implementation of Agent Skills. Drop a skill folder into ~/.claude/skills and Claude Code loads it automatically whenever a task matches the skill's description. Claude Code docs
Inside SKILL.md
Written by affaan-mTest-Driven Development Workflow
This skill ensures all code development follows TDD principles with comprehensive test coverage.
When to Activate
- Writing new features or functionality
- Fixing bugs or issues
- Refactoring existing code
- Adding API endpoints
- Creating new components
Core Principles
1. Tests BEFORE Code
ALWAYS write tests first, then implement code to make tests pass.
2. Coverage Requirements
- Minimum 80% coverage (unit + integration + E2E)
- All edge cases covered
- Error scenarios tested
- Boundary conditions verified
3. Test Types
Unit Tests
- Individual functions and utilities
- Component logic
- Pure functions
- Helpers and utilities
Integration Tests
- API endpoints
- Database operations
- Service interactions
- External API calls
E2E Tests (Playwright)
- Critical user flows
- Complete workflows
- Browser automation
- UI interactions
TDD Workflow Steps
Step 0: Detect the Test Runner
Do not assume npm test. The commands in the steps and examples below use <test>, <test-watch>, and <coverage> as placeholders for the project's actual runner. Resolve them once before starting:
-
Run the package-manager detector (ships with ECC):
node scripts/setup-package-manager.js --detectIt resolves the package manager (npm / pnpm / yarn / bun) from, in order:
CLAUDE_PACKAGE_MANAGER,.claude/package-manager.json, thepackage.jsonpackageManagerfield, the lockfile, then global config. -
Distinguish the package manager from the test runner — they are not the same. A project can use Bun to install dependencies yet still run Jest or Vitest. Inspect
package.jsonscripts.testand the test files:scripts.testinvokesjest/vitest-> run through the detected PM (npm test,pnpm test,yarn test, orbun run test).scripts.testisbun test, or test filesimport { test, expect } from "bun:test", or there is no jest/vitest config but Bun is present -> use Bun's native runner (bun test). See Bun Native Test Pattern below.
Runner command matrix:
| Runner | <test> | <test-watch> | <coverage> | <lint> |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| npm | npm test | npm test -- --watch | npm run test:coverage | npm run lint |
| pnpm | pnpm test | pnpm test --watch | pnpm test:coverage | pnpm lint |
| yarn | yarn test | yarn test --watch | yarn test:coverage | yarn lint |
| Bun (script runs jest/vitest) | bun run test | bun run test --watch | bun run test:coverage | bun run lint |
Bun (native bun:test) | bun test | bun test --watch | bun test --coverage | bun run lint |
bun test(Bun's built-in runner) is not the same asbun run test(which runs thepackage.jsontestscript). Picking the wrong one is a common failure — e.g. invoking Jest throughnpx/bun runin an ESM-only project breaks, whilebun testruns the suite natively. Confirm which the project expects before the RED gate, then substitute<test>/<coverage>everywherenpm testappears below.
Step 1: Write User Journeys
As a [role], I want to [action], so that [benefit]
Example:
As a user, I want to search for markets semantically,
so that I can find relevant markets even without exact keywords.
Step 2: Generate Test Cases
For each user journey, create comprehensive test cases:
describe('Semantic Search', () => {
it('returns relevant markets for query', async () => {
// Test implementation
})
it('handles empty query gracefully', async () => {
// Test edge case
})
it('falls back to substring search when Redis unavailable', async () => {
// Test fallback behavior
})
it('sorts results by similarity score', async () => {
// Test sorting logic
})
})
Step 3: Run Tests (They Should Fail)
<test>
# Tests should fail - we haven't implemented yet
Step 4: Implement Code
Write minimal code to make tests pass:
// Implementation guided by tests
export async function searchMarkets(query: string) {
// Implementation here
}
Step 5: Run Tests Again
<test>
# Tests should now pass
Step 6: Refactor
Improve code quality while keeping tests green:
- Remove duplication
- Improve naming
- Optimize performance
- Enhance readability
Step 7: Verify Coverage
<coverage>
# Verify 80%+ coverage achieved
Testing Patterns
Unit Test Pattern (Jest/Vitest)
import { render, screen, fireEvent } from '@testing-library/react'
import { Button } from './Button'
describe('Button Component', () => {
it('renders with correct text', () => {
render(<Button>Click me</Button>)
expect(screen.getByText('Click me')).toBeInTheDocument()
})
it('calls onClick when clicked', () => {
const handleClick = jest.fn()
render(<Button onClick={handleClick}>Click</Button>)
fireEvent.click(screen.getByRole('button'))
expect(handleClick).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)
})
it('is disabled when disabled prop is true', () => {
render(<Button disabled>Click</Button>)
expect(screen.getByRole('button')).toBeDisabled()
})
})
Bun Native Test Pattern (bun:test)
When the project uses Bun's built-in runner (see Step 0), import from bun:test and run with bun test — not bun run test. The API is Jest-like, so describe / it / expect and most matchers carry over. See the bun-runtime skill for runtime, install, and bundler details.
import { describe, it, expect, mock } from 'bun:test'
import { searchMarkets } from './search'
describe('searchMarkets', () => {
it('returns an empty list for an empty query', async () => {
expect(await searchMarkets('')).toEqual([])
})
it('sorts results by similarity score', async () => {
const results = await searchMarkets('election')
expect(results).toEqual([...results].sort((a, b) => b.score - a.score))
})
})
bun test # run once (RED/GREEN gate)
bun test --watch # watch mode during development
bun test --coverage # coverage report
- Mock modules with
mock.module(...)/mock(...)frombun:testinstead ofjest.mock(...). - Configure coverage thresholds in
bunfig.tomlunder[test](e.g.coverageThreshold) rather than the JestcoverageThresholdsconfig block.
API Integration Test Pattern
import { NextRequest } from 'next/server'
import { GET } from './route'
describe('GET /api/markets', () => {
it('returns markets successfully', async () => {
const request = new NextRequest('http://localhost/api/markets')
const response = await GET(request)
const data = await response.json()
expect(response.status).toBe(200)
expect(data.success).toBe(true)
expect(Array.isArray(data.data)).toBe(true)
})
it('validates query parameters', async () => {
const request = new NextRequest('http://localhost/api/markets?limit=invalid')
const response = await GET(request)
expect(response.status).toBe(400)
})
it('handles database errors gracefully', async () => {
// Mock database failure
const request = new NextRequest('http://localhost/api/markets')
// Test error handling
})
})
E2E Test Pattern (Playwright)
import { test, expect } from '@playwright/test'
test('user can search and filter markets', async ({ page }) => {
// Navigate to markets page
await page.goto('/')
await page.click('a[href="/markets"]')
// Verify page loaded
await expect(page.locator('h1')).toContainText('Markets')
// Search for markets
await page.fill('input[placeholder="Search markets"]', 'election')
// Wait for debounce and results
await page.waitForTimeout(600)
// Verify search results displayed
const results = page.locator('[data-testid="market-card"]')
await expect(results).toHaveCount(5, { timeout: 5000 })
// Verify results contain search term
const firstResult = results.first()
await expect(firstResult).toContainText('election', { ignoreCase: true })
// Filter by status
await page.click('button:has-text("Active")')
// Verify filtered results
await expect(results).toHaveCount(3)
})
test('user can create a new market', async ({ page }) => {
// Login first
await page.goto('/creator-dashboard')
// Fill market creation form
await page.fill('input[name="name"]', 'Test Market')
await page.fill('textarea[name="description"]', 'Test description')
await page.fill('input[name="endDate"]', '2025-12-31')
// Submit form
await page.click('button[type="submit"]')
// Verify success message
await expect(page.locator('text=Market created successfully')).toBeVisible()
// Verify redirect to market page
await expect(page).toHaveURL(/\/markets\/test-market/)
})
Test File Organization
src/
├── components/
│ ├── Button/
│ │ ├── Button.tsx
│ │ ├── Button.test.tsx # Unit tests
│ │ └── Button.stories.tsx # Storybook
│ └── MarketCard/
│ ├── MarketCard.tsx
│ └── MarketCard.test.tsx
├── app/
│ └── api/
│ └── markets/
│ ├── route.ts
│ └── route.test.ts # Integration tests
└── e2e/
├── markets.spec.ts # E2E tests
├── trading.spec.ts
└── auth.spec.ts
Mocking External Services
Supabase Mock
jest.mock('@/lib/supabase', () => ({
supabase: {
from: jest.fn(() => ({
select: jest.fn(() => ({
eq: jest.fn(() => Promise.resolve({
data: [{ id: 1, name: 'Test Market' }],
error: null
}))
}))
}))
}
}))
Redis Mock
jest.mock('@/lib/redis', () => ({
searchMarketsByVector: jest.fn(() => Promise.resolve([
{ slug: 'test-market', similarity_score: 0.95 }
])),
checkRedisHealth: jest.fn(() => Promise.resolve({ connected: true }))
}))
OpenAI Mock
jest.mock('@/lib/openai', () => ({
generateEmbedding: jest.fn(() => Promise.resolve(
new Array(1536).fill(0.1) // Mock 1536-dim embedding
))
}))
Test Coverage Verification
Run Coverage Report
<coverage>
Coverage Thresholds
{
"jest": {
"coverageThresholds": {
"global": {
"branches": 80,
"functions": 80,
"lines": 80,
"statements": 80
}
}
}
}
Common Testing Mistakes to Avoid
FAIL: WRONG: Testing Implementation Details
// Don't test internal state
expect(component.state.count).toBe(5)
PASS: CORRECT: Test User-Visible Behavior
// Test what users see
expect(screen.getByText('Count: 5')).toBeInTheDocument()
FAIL: WRONG: Brittle Selectors
// Breaks easily
await page.click('.css-class-xyz')
PASS: CORRECT: Semantic Selectors
// Resilient to changes
await page.click('button:has-text("Submit")')
await page.click('[data-testid="submit-button"]')
FAIL: WRONG: No Test Isolation
// Tests depend on each other
test('creates user', () => { /* ... */ })
test('updates same user', () => { /* depends on previous test */ })
PASS: CORRECT: Independent Tests
// Each test sets up its own data
test('creates user', () => {
const user = createTestUser()
// Test logic
})
test('updates user', () => {
const user = createTestUser()
// Update logic
})
Continuous Testing
Watch Mode During Development
<test-watch>
# Tests run automatically on file changes
Pre-Commit Hook
# Runs before every commit
<test> && <lint>
CI/CD Integration
# GitHub Actions
- name: Run Tests
run: <coverage>
- name: Upload Coverage
uses: codecov/codecov-action@v3
Best Practices
- Write Tests First - Always TDD
- One Assert Per Test - Focus on single behavior
- Descriptive Test Names - Explain what's tested
- Arrange-Act-Assert - Clear test structure
- Mock External Dependencies - Isolate unit tests
- Test Edge Cases - Null, undefined, empty, large
- Test Error Paths - Not just happy paths
- Keep Tests Fast - Unit tests < 50ms each
- Clean Up After Tests - No side effects
- Review Coverage Reports - Identify gaps
Success Metrics
- 80%+ code coverage achieved
- All tests passing (green)
- No skipped or disabled tests
- Fast test execution (< 30s for unit tests)
- E2E tests cover critical user flows
- Tests catch bugs before production
Remember: Tests are not optional. They are the safety net that enables confident refactoring, rapid development, and production reliability.
Frequently asked questions about Test-Driven Development Workflow
Similar skills
React Composition Patterns
Streamline your React component architecture with proven patterns.
Pester Should Migration
Easily convert Pester v5 assertions to v6 syntax.
Radix to Base UI Migration
Seamlessly migrate React components from Radix UI to Base UI.
Migrate Next.js to Vinext
Seamlessly transition your Next.js projects to Vinext.
WinUI 3 Migration Guide
Streamline your UWP to WinUI 3 migration process.
Refactor
Enhance code maintainability without altering behavior.
