
RTK TDD Workflow
FreeStreamline your RTK filter development with TDD.
Free · Opens the source repo
What RTK TDD Workflow does
The RTK TDD Workflow skill is designed for developers working with RTK filters in Rust, implementing a Test-Driven Development (TDD) approach. This skill enforces the Red-Green-Refactor cycle, ensuring that your filter implementations are robust and maintainable. By utilizing real fixtures and snapshot testing with the insta library, it helps you validate outputs against expected results while also ensuring significant token savings in your command outputs.
The workflow begins with capturing real command outputs as fixtures, which eliminates the need for synthetic test data. This practice not only enhances the reliability of your tests but also ensures that your filters behave correctly with actual data. The skill guides you through writing tests that assert the correctness of output formats and token savings, thus promoting a disciplined approach to development.
As you progress through the TDD cycle, the skill automatically triggers tests on new filter implementations, making it easier to maintain high code quality. The process culminates in a quality gate that checks for code formatting, linting, and test pass rates, ensuring that your code adheres to best practices before integration. This structured approach is particularly beneficial for teams looking to adopt TDD methodologies in their Rust projects.
Overall, the RTK TDD Workflow skill is ideal for Rust developers who want to implement TDD in their RTK filter development, providing a clear framework to follow while promoting best practices in testing and code quality.
When to use it
Use this skill when developing RTK filters in Rust and you want to implement a disciplined TDD workflow.
When not to use it
This skill may not be suitable for projects that do not require TDD or where synthetic test data is acceptable.
What you can build with it
Implementing a New RTK Filter
Use the skill to ensure your new filter follows TDD principles, capturing real outputs and validating them through tests.
Maintaining Existing Filters
Leverage the skill to refactor existing filters while ensuring that all tests pass, maintaining code quality.
Onboarding New Team Members
The structured workflow helps new developers understand TDD practices in the context of RTK filter development.
How to install RTK TDD Workflow
View source1. Install with the skills CLI
npx skills add rtk-ai/rtk/tdd-rust --agent claude-code2. Or install it manually
Download the skill folder and drop it into ~/.claude/skills/ for all projects, or .claude/skills/ to scope it to one repo. Restart Claude Code so it picks up the new skill.
Anthropic's agentic coding CLI, and the reference implementation of Agent Skills. Drop a skill folder into ~/.claude/skills and Claude Code loads it automatically whenever a task matches the skill's description. Claude Code docs
Inside SKILL.md
Written by rtk-aiRTK TDD Workflow
Enforce Red-Green-Refactor for all RTK filter development.
The Loop
1. RED — Write failing test with real fixture
2. GREEN — Implement minimum code to pass
3. REFACTOR — Clean up, verify still passing
4. SAVINGS — Verify ≥60% token reduction
5. SNAPSHOT — Lock output format with insta
Step 1: Real Fixture First
Never write synthetic test data. Capture real command output:
# Capture real output from the actual command
git log -20 > tests/fixtures/git_log_raw.txt
cargo test 2>&1 > tests/fixtures/cargo_test_raw.txt
cargo clippy 2>&1 > tests/fixtures/cargo_clippy_raw.txt
gh pr view 42 > tests/fixtures/gh_pr_view_raw.txt
# For commands with ANSI codes — capture as-is
script -q /dev/null cargo test 2>&1 > tests/fixtures/cargo_test_ansi_raw.txt
Fixture naming: tests/fixtures/<command>_raw.txt
Step 2: Write the Test (Red)
#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
use super::*;
use insta::assert_snapshot;
fn count_tokens(s: &str) -> usize {
s.split_whitespace().count()
}
// Test 1: Output format (snapshot)
#[test]
fn test_filter_output_format() {
let input = include_str!("../tests/fixtures/mycmd_raw.txt");
let output = filter_mycmd(input).expect("filter should not fail");
assert_snapshot!(output);
}
// Test 2: Token savings ≥60%
#[test]
fn test_token_savings() {
let input = include_str!("../tests/fixtures/mycmd_raw.txt");
let output = filter_mycmd(input).expect("filter should not fail");
let input_tokens = count_tokens(input);
let output_tokens = count_tokens(&output);
let savings = 100.0 * (1.0 - output_tokens as f64 / input_tokens as f64);
assert!(
savings >= 60.0,
"Expected ≥60% token savings, got {:.1}% ({} → {} tokens)",
savings, input_tokens, output_tokens
);
}
// Test 3: Edge cases
#[test]
fn test_empty_input() {
let result = filter_mycmd("");
assert!(result.is_ok());
// Empty input = empty output OR passthrough, never panic
}
#[test]
fn test_malformed_input() {
let result = filter_mycmd("not valid command output\nrandom text\n");
// Must not panic — either filter best-effort or return input unchanged
assert!(result.is_ok());
}
}
Run: cargo test → should fail (function doesn't exist yet).
Step 3: Minimum Implementation (Green)
// src/mycmd_cmd.rs
use anyhow::{Context, Result};
use regex::Regex;
use std::sync::LazyLock;
static ERROR_RE: LazyLock<Regex> =
LazyLock::new(|| Regex::new(r"^error").unwrap());
pub fn filter_mycmd(input: &str) -> Result<String> {
if input.is_empty() {
return Ok(String::new());
}
let filtered: Vec<&str> = input.lines()
.filter(|line| ERROR_RE.is_match(line))
.collect();
Ok(filtered.join("\n"))
}
Run: cargo test → green.
Step 4: Accept Snapshot
# First run creates the snapshot
cargo test test_filter_output_format
# Review what was captured
cargo insta review
# Press 'a' to accept
# Snapshot saved to src/snapshots/mycmd_cmd__tests__test_filter_output_format.snap
Step 5: Wire to main.rs (Integration)
// src/main.rs
mod mycmd_cmd;
#[derive(Subcommand)]
pub enum Commands {
// ... existing commands ...
Mycmd(MycmdArgs),
}
// In match:
Commands::Mycmd(args) => mycmd_cmd::run(args),
// src/mycmd_cmd.rs — add run() function
pub fn run(args: MycmdArgs) -> Result<()> {
let output = execute_command("mycmd", &args.to_vec())
.context("Failed to execute mycmd")?;
let filtered = filter_mycmd(&output.stdout)
.unwrap_or_else(|e| {
eprintln!("rtk: filter warning: {}", e);
output.stdout.clone()
});
tracking::record("mycmd", &output.stdout, &filtered)?;
print!("{}", filtered);
if !output.status.success() {
std::process::exit(output.status.code().unwrap_or(1));
}
Ok(())
}
Step 6: Quality Gate
cargo fmt --all && cargo clippy --all-targets && cargo test
All 3 must pass. Zero clippy warnings.
Arrange-Act-Assert Pattern
#[test]
fn test_filters_only_errors() {
// Arrange
let input = "info: starting build\nerror[E0001]: undefined\nwarning: unused\n";
// Act
let output = filter_mycmd(input).expect("should succeed");
// Assert
assert!(output.contains("error[E0001]"), "Should keep error lines");
assert!(!output.contains("info:"), "Should drop info lines");
assert!(!output.contains("warning:"), "Should drop warning lines");
}
RTK-Specific Test Patterns
Test ANSI stripping
#[test]
fn test_strips_ansi_codes() {
let input = "\x1b[32mSuccess\x1b[0m\n\x1b[31merror: failed\x1b[0m\n";
let output = filter_mycmd(input).expect("should succeed");
assert!(!output.contains("\x1b["), "ANSI codes should be stripped");
assert!(output.contains("error: failed"), "Content should be preserved");
}
Test fallback behavior
#[test]
fn test_filter_handles_unexpected_format() {
// Give it something completely unexpected
let input = "completely unexpected\x00binary\xff data";
// Should not panic — returns Ok() with either empty or passthrough
let result = filter_mycmd(input);
assert!(result.is_ok(), "Filter must not panic on unexpected input");
}
Test savings at multiple sizes
#[test]
fn test_savings_large_output() {
// 1000-line fixture → must still hit ≥60%
let large_input: String = (0..1000)
.map(|i| format!("info: processing item {}\n", i))
.collect();
let output = filter_mycmd(&large_input).expect("should succeed");
let savings = 100.0 * (1.0 - count_tokens(&output) as f64 / count_tokens(&large_input) as f64);
assert!(savings >= 60.0, "Large output savings: {:.1}%", savings);
}
What "Done" Looks Like
Checklist before moving on:
-
tests/fixtures/<cmd>_raw.txt— real command output -
filter_<cmd>()function returnsResult<String> - Snapshot test passes and accepted via
cargo insta review - Token savings test: ≥60% verified
- Empty input test: no panic
- Malformed input test: no panic
-
run()function with fallback pattern - Registered in
main.rsCommands enum -
cargo fmt --all && cargo clippy --all-targets && cargo test— all green
Never Do This
// ❌ Synthetic fixture data
let input = "fake error: something went wrong"; // Not real cargo output
// ❌ Missing savings test
#[test]
fn test_filter() {
let output = filter_mycmd(input);
assert!(!output.is_empty()); // No savings verification
}
// ❌ unwrap() in production code
let filtered = filter_mycmd(input).unwrap(); // Panic in prod
// ❌ Regex inside the filter function
fn filter_mycmd(input: &str) -> Result<String> {
let re = Regex::new(r"^error").unwrap(); // Recompiles every call
...
}
Frequently asked questions about RTK TDD Workflow
Similar skills
Spring Boot Testing
Master testing techniques for Spring Boot 4 applications.
GitHub Issues
Manage GitHub issues efficiently with MCP tools.
Geofeed Tuner
Optimize your IP geolocation feeds in CSV format.
Batch Files
Master Windows batch scripting for automation and task management.
Adobe Illustrator Scripting
Automate your Illustrator workflows with ExtendScript.
Plugin Structure
Create and organize Claude Code plugins effectively.
