
Swift Concurrency
FreeDiagnose and refactor Swift concurrency issues effectively.
Free · Opens the source repo
What Swift Concurrency does
The Swift Concurrency skill is designed for developers working with Swift, particularly those transitioning to Swift 6 and its concurrency model. It provides a structured approach to diagnosing issues related to concurrency, such as data races, thread safety, and compiler warnings. By analyzing project settings and code structure, this skill helps identify the correct isolation boundaries and suggests safe refactoring strategies to migrate callback-based code to async/await patterns.
This skill emphasizes the importance of understanding the isolation context in which your code operates. It guides users through a systematic process of capturing diagnostics, determining the appropriate actor isolation, and ensuring that UI-bound code is handled correctly. The skill also addresses common pitfalls, such as the misuse of @MainActor and unstructured tasks, promoting best practices for structured concurrency. With detailed references on actors, async algorithms, and memory management, developers can deepen their understanding while addressing immediate issues.
Whether you are an experienced Swift developer or new to concurrency in Swift, this skill offers valuable insights and practical solutions. It is particularly useful in projects where concurrency is a critical concern, allowing developers to maintain code quality while adapting to the evolving Swift ecosystem. By following the guidelines provided, users can optimize their concurrency practices and ensure their applications are robust and efficient.
In summary, the Swift Concurrency skill is an essential tool for any developer looking to navigate the complexities of Swift's concurrency model, providing both diagnostic capabilities and actionable refactoring advice.
When to use it
Use this skill when working on Swift projects that involve concurrency, especially during migration to Swift 6 or when refactoring callback-based code.
When not to use it
This skill may not be suitable for projects that do not utilize Swift's concurrency features or for developers unfamiliar with Swift programming.
What you can build with it
Diagnosing Data Races
Use the skill to analyze your Swift code for potential data races and get recommendations for safe isolation.
Refactoring Legacy Callbacks
Transform older callback-based code into modern async/await patterns, improving readability and maintainability.
Guiding Swift 6 Migration
Receive tailored advice on migrating your projects to Swift 6, focusing on concurrency and actor model best practices.
How to install Swift Concurrency
View source1. Install with the skills CLI
npx skills add avdlee/swift-concurrency-agent-skill/swift-concurrency --agent claude-code2. Or install it manually
Download the skill folder and drop it into ~/.claude/skills/ for all projects, or .claude/skills/ to scope it to one repo. Restart Claude Code so it picks up the new skill.
Anthropic's agentic coding CLI, and the reference implementation of Agent Skills. Drop a skill folder into ~/.claude/skills and Claude Code loads it automatically whenever a task matches the skill's description. Claude Code docs
Inside SKILL.md
Written by avdleeSwift Concurrency
Fast Path
Before proposing a fix:
- Analyze
Package.swiftor.pbxprojto determine Swift language mode, strict concurrency level, default isolation, and upcoming features. Do this always, not only for migration work. - Capture the exact diagnostic and offending symbol.
- Determine the isolation boundary:
@MainActor, custom actor, actor instance isolation, ornonisolated. - Confirm whether the code is UI-bound or intended to run off the main actor. When spawning unstructured tasks, inspect the synchronous prefix (everything before the first
await): start on@MainActoronly when that prefix truly needs main-actor access; otherwise useTask { @concurrent in ... }and hop back withMainActor.runonly after the suspension. A trivial non-main line (for example,print) followed by main-actor work in the same prefix is not a reason to use@concurrent. For delayed retries, timers, and backoff tasks, separate the waiting from the UI mutation. The sleep often belongs off the main actor even when the final state update belongs on it.
Project settings that change concurrency behavior:
| Setting | SwiftPM (Package.swift) | Xcode (.pbxproj) |
|---|---|---|
| Language mode | swiftLanguageVersions or -swift-version (// swift-tools-version: is not a reliable proxy) | Swift Language Version |
| Strict concurrency | .enableExperimentalFeature("StrictConcurrency=targeted") | SWIFT_STRICT_CONCURRENCY |
| Default isolation | .defaultIsolation(MainActor.self) | SWIFT_DEFAULT_ACTOR_ISOLATION |
| Upcoming features | .enableUpcomingFeature("NonisolatedNonsendingByDefault") | SWIFT_UPCOMING_FEATURE_* |
| Approachable Concurrency | N/A (use individual upcoming features) | SWIFT_APPROACHABLE_CONCURRENCY |
Xcode 26 note: New projects created in Xcode 26 will often start with
SWIFT_DEFAULT_ACTOR_ISOLATION = MainActorandSWIFT_APPROACHABLE_CONCURRENCY = YESenabled by default. Treat these as likely defaults for newly created projects, not as confirmed settings.
If any of these are unknown, ask the developer to confirm them before giving migration-sensitive guidance. Do not guess, even for new Xcode 26 projects.
Guardrails:
- Do not recommend
@MainActoras a blanket fix. Justify why the code is truly UI-bound. - Prefer structured concurrency over unstructured tasks. Use
Task.detachedonly with a clear reason. - If recommending
@preconcurrency,@unchecked Sendable, ornonisolated(unsafe), require a documented safety invariant and a follow-up removal plan. - Optimize for the smallest safe change. Do not refactor unrelated architecture during migration.
- Course references are for deeper learning only. Use them sparingly and only when they clearly help answer the developer's question.
Quick Fix Mode
Use Quick Fix Mode when all of these are true:
- The issue is localized to one file or one type.
- The isolation boundary is clear.
- The fix can be explained in 1-2 behavior-preserving steps.
Skip Quick Fix Mode when any of these are true:
- Build settings or default isolation are unknown.
- The issue crosses module boundaries or changes public API behavior.
- The likely fix depends on unsafe escape hatches.
Common Diagnostics
| Diagnostic | First check | Smallest safe fix | Escalate to |
|---|---|---|---|
Main actor-isolated ... cannot be used from a nonisolated context | Is this truly UI-bound? | Isolate the caller to @MainActor or use await MainActor.run { ... } only when main-actor ownership is correct. | references/actors.md, references/threading.md |
Actor-isolated type does not conform to protocol | Must the requirement run on the actor? | Prefer isolated conformance (e.g., extension Foo: @MainActor SomeProtocol); use nonisolated only for truly nonisolated requirements. | references/actors.md |
Sending value of non-Sendable type ... risks causing data races | What isolation boundary is being crossed? | Keep access inside one actor, or convert the transferred value to an immutable/value type. | references/sendable.md, references/threading.md |
SwiftLint async_without_await | Is async actually required by protocol, override, or @concurrent? | Remove async, or use a narrow suppression with rationale. Never add fake awaits. | references/linting.md |
wait(...) is unavailable from asynchronous contexts | Is this legacy XCTest async waiting? | Replace with await fulfillment(of:) or Swift Testing equivalents. | references/testing.md |
| Core Data concurrency warnings | Are NSManagedObject instances crossing contexts or actors? | Pass NSManagedObjectID or map to a Sendable value type. | references/core-data.md |
Thread.current unavailable from asynchronous contexts | Are you debugging by thread instead of isolation? | Reason in terms of isolation and use Instruments/debugger instead. | references/threading.md |
| SwiftLint concurrency-related warnings | Which specific lint rule triggered? | Use references/linting.md for rule intent and preferred fixes; avoid dummy awaits. | references/linting.md |
... cannot satisfy conformance requirement for a 'Sendable' type parameter (SendableMetatype) | Does the conformance carry global-actor isolation? | Remove actor isolation from the conformance, or avoid passing the metatype across isolation boundaries. See SendableMetatype section in references/actors.md. | references/actors.md |
When Quick Fixes Fail
- Gather project settings if not already confirmed.
- Re-evaluate which isolation boundaries the type crosses.
- Route to the matching reference file for a deeper fix.
- If the fix may change behavior, document the invariant and add verification steps.
Smallest Safe Fixes
Prefer changes that preserve behavior while satisfying data-race safety:
- UI-bound state: isolate the type or member to
@MainActor. - Shared mutable state: move it behind an
actor, or use@MainActoronly if the state is UI-owned. - Background work: when work must hop off caller isolation, use an
asyncAPI marked@concurrent; when work can safely inherit caller isolation, usenonisolatedwithout@concurrent. When spawning aTask, match entry isolation to its synchronous prefix. If nothing before the firstawaitneeds the main actor, useTask { @concurrent in ... }and hop back viaawait MainActor.run { ... }for the UI update. If the prefix mixes a trivial non-main statement with main-actor work, keep the inherited@MainActorstart—splitting the cheap line off-main is not worth an extra hop. - Sendability issues: prefer immutable values and explicit boundaries over
@unchecked Sendable.
Concurrency Tool Selection
| Need | Tool | Key Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| Single async operation | async/await | Default choice for sequential async work |
| Fixed parallel operations | async let | Known count at compile time; auto-cancelled on throw |
| Dynamic parallel operations | withTaskGroup | Unknown count; structured — cancels children on scope exit |
| Sync → async bridge | Task { } | Inherits actor context; use Task.detached only with documented reason |
| Shared mutable state | actor | Prefer over locks/queues; keep isolated sections small |
| UI-bound state | @MainActor | Only for truly UI-related code; justify isolation |
Common Scenarios
Network request with UI update
Task { @concurrent in
let data = try await fetchData()
await MainActor.run { self.updateUI(with: data) }
}
Processing array items in parallel
await withTaskGroup(of: ProcessedItem.self) { group in
for item in items {
group.addTask { await process(item) }
}
for await result in group {
results.append(result)
}
}
Task entry isolation
Match a Task's entry isolation to its synchronous prefix (everything from { to the first await).
- If anything in that prefix needs
@MainActor, keep the inherited@MainActorstart. - If nothing in that prefix needs
@MainActor, preferTask { @concurrent in ... }and hop back only for UI-owned mutation.
// ❌ Synchronous prefix is empty; first work hops away
Task {
await hopToOtherIsolationDomain()
}
// ❌ Synchronous prefix is only `print` (trivial, non-main); first await hops away
Task {
print("Also not main-thread-bound")
await hopToOtherIsolationDomain()
}
// ✅ Start off the main actor, hop back only for UI work
Task { @concurrent in
await hopToOtherIsolationDomain()
await MainActor.run { updateUI() }
}
// ✅ Synchronous prefix DOES contain main-actor work — keep inheritance
Task {
print("debug") // trivial, non-main — rides along
self.isLoading = true // needs @MainActor, before any await
await fetchData()
}
Swift 6 Migration Quick Guide
Key changes in Swift 6:
- Strict concurrency checking enabled by default
- Complete data-race safety at compile time
- Sendable requirements enforced on boundaries
- Isolation checking for all async boundaries
Migration Validation Loop
Apply this cycle for each migration change:
- Build — Run
swift buildor Xcode build to surface new diagnostics - Fix — Address one category of error at a time (e.g., all Sendable issues first)
- Rebuild — Confirm the fix compiles cleanly before moving on
- Test — Run the test suite to catch regressions (
swift testor Cmd+U) - Only proceed to the next file/module when all diagnostics are resolved
If a fix introduces new warnings, resolve them before continuing. Never batch multiple unrelated fixes — keep commits small and reviewable.
For detailed migration steps, see references/migration.md.
Reference Router
Open the smallest reference that matches the question:
- Foundations
references/async-await-basics.md— async/await syntax, execution order, async let, URLSession patternsreferences/tasks.md— Task lifecycle, cancellation, priorities, task groups, structured vs unstructuredreferences/actors.md— Actor isolation, @MainActor, global actors, reentrancy, custom executors, Mutexreferences/sendable.md— Sendable conformance, value/reference types, @unchecked, region isolationreferences/threading.md— Execution model, suspension points, Swift 6.2 isolation behavior
- Streams
references/async-sequences.md— AsyncSequence, AsyncStream, when to use vs regular async methodsreferences/async-algorithms.md— Debounce, throttle, merge, combineLatest, channels, timers
- Applied topics
references/testing.md— Swift Testing first, XCTest fallback, leak checksreferences/performance.md— Profiling with Instruments, reducing suspension points, execution strategiesreferences/memory-management.md— Retain cycles in tasks, memory safety patternsreferences/core-data.md— NSManagedObject sendability, custom executors, isolation conflicts
- Migration and tooling
references/migration.md— Swift 6 migration strategy, closure-to-async conversion, @preconcurrency, FRP migrationreferences/linting.md— Concurrency-focused lint rules and SwiftLintasync_without_await
- Glossary
references/glossary.md— Quick definitions of core concurrency terms
Verification Checklist
When changing concurrency code:
- Re-check build settings before interpreting diagnostics.
- Build and clear one category of errors before moving on. Do not batch unrelated fixes into the same change.
- Run tests, especially actor-, lifetime-, and cancellation-sensitive tests.
- Use Instruments for performance claims instead of guessing.
- Verify deallocation and cancellation behavior for long-lived tasks.
- Check
Task.isCancelledin long-running operations. - Never use semaphores or ad hoc locking in async contexts when actor isolation or
Mutexwould express ownership more safely.
Note: This skill is based on the comprehensive Swift Concurrency Course by Antoine van der Lee.
Frequently asked questions about Swift Concurrency
Similar skills
React Composition Patterns
Streamline your React component architecture with proven patterns.
Pester Should Migration
Easily convert Pester v5 assertions to v6 syntax.
Radix to Base UI Migration
Seamlessly migrate React components from Radix UI to Base UI.
Migrate Next.js to Vinext
Seamlessly transition your Next.js projects to Vinext.
WinUI 3 Migration Guide
Streamline your UWP to WinUI 3 migration process.
Refactor
Enhance code maintainability without altering behavior.
